Deception involves the use of words or actions to induce false beliefs. Psychologists tend to distinguish between the intentional deception of other individuals and various forms of self-deception. Deception is a common – although controversial – means through which psychologists seek to increase the ecological validity of their studies. To counteract the influence of social desirability and other biases, psychologists often want to disguise the purpose of the study from the participants.
Deception; ethics; social psychology; experimentation
As initially conceptualized by Wilhelm Wundt, experimental psychology excluded the use of deception from its research design. Wundt insisted that reliable experiments required a highly trained and informed observer carefully reporting on the introspective content of their consciousness under the controlled conditions provided by the experimenter. Indeed, the role of experimenter and participant...
- Baumrind, D. (1964). Some thoughts on ethics of research: After reading Milgram’s “behavioral study of obedience. American Psychologist, 19(6), 421–423.Google Scholar
- Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject. Cambridge, Mass: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Derksen, M. (2010). People as scientific instruments. Spontaneous Generations, 4, 21–29.Google Scholar
- Fausto-Sterling, A. (2000). Sexing the body: Gender and the construction of sexuality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Harris, B. (1988). Key words: A history of debriefing in social psychology. In J. Morawski (Ed.), The rise of experimentation in American psychology (pp. 188–212). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Herman, E. (2008). Kinship by design: A history of adoption in the modern united states. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Korn, J. H. (1997). Illusions of reality: a history of deception in social psychology. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
- Nicholson, I. (2011b). “Torture at Yale”: Experimental subjects, laboratory torment and the “rehabilitation” of Milgram’s’Obedience to authority. Theory and Psychology, 21(6), 737–761.Google Scholar
- Ortmann, A., & Hertwig, R. (1997). Is deception acceptable? American Psychologist, 52, 746–747.Google Scholar
- Pettit, M. (2013). The science of deception: Psychology and commerce in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar