Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology

2014 Edition
| Editors: Thomas Teo

Deprivation, Overview

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_662

Introduction

Deprivation has been a subject of theory and research in psychology principally in the following forms: sensory, sleep, maternal, and social. Traditional psychology has focused on examining the physiological and psychological consequences of sensory and sleep deprivation. Another area of extensive study in psychoanalytic literature has been maternal deprivation (Bowlby, 1982). This understanding of deprivation has tended to focus on the role of biological and individual factors in understanding the adverse impact of failing to meet basic, innate needs. Many of the applications of this research have been aimed at removing risks posed by deprivation to individual well-being. However, the often acontextual nature of such investigation and presumption of value-free science (Prilleltensky 1997; Sarason 1981) has increased the risk of abusive uses of this knowledge. One example is the use of sensory deprivation in torture (McCoy, 2007).

The study of social deprivation or the...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss, vol. 1: Attachment (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books. (Original work published 1969).Google Scholar
  2. David, B. (1993). An overview of research regarding the effectiveness of restricted environmental stimulation therapy as a complementary treatment for a range of behavioral disorders. Neurobehavioral Health Services, 1, 1–3.Google Scholar
  3. Evans, G. W. (2004). The environment of childhood poverty. American Psychologist, 59, 77–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Evans, G. W., & Kim, P. (2007). Childhood poverty and health: Cumulative risk exposure and stress dysregulation. Psychological Science, 18, 953–957.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. McCoy, A. W. (2007). Science in Dachau’s shadow: Hebb, Beecher, and the development of CIA psychological torture and modern medical ethics. Journal of the History of Behavioral Sciences, 43(4), 401–417.Google Scholar
  6. Prilleltensky, I. (1997). Values, assumptions, and practices: Assessing the moral implications of psychological discourse and action. American Psychologist, 52(5), 517–535.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Prilleltensky, I. (2008). The role of power in wellness, oppression, and liberation: The promise of psychopolitical validity. Journal of Community Psychology, 36, 116–136.Google Scholar
  8. Prilleltensky, I., & Nelson, G. (2002). Doing psychology critically: Making a difference in diverse settings. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. Rank, M. R. (2004). One nation, underprivileged: Why American poverty affects us all. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Rogers, A., & Pilgrim, D. (2003). Mental health and inequality. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  11. Sarason, S. B. (1981). An asocial psychology and a misdirected clinical psychology. American Psychologist, 36, 827–836.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  13. van der Horst, F. C. P., & van der Veer, R. (2010). The ontogeny of an idea: John Bowlby and contemporaries on mother-child separation. History of Psychology, 13(1), 25–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Vicedo, M. (2009). Mothers, machines, and morals: Harry Harlow’s work on primate love from lab to legend. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 45(3), 193–218.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Clinical Psychology ProgramChicago School of Professional PsychologyChicagoUSA