Skip to main content

Research Ethics, Overview

  • Reference work entry
Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology
  • 121 Accesses

Introduction

The area of research ethics and its related research governance issues have grown within the past few decades. While there have been frameworks in place that laid out general principles for researchers for conduct during the actual process of data collection, in more recent times, there has been a more detailed engagement with the research process with some researchers noting the importance of being mindful of ethical concerns throughout the entire research journey (Kvale, 1996). Others note the tensions inherent in ethical codes – of universal versus relative ethics, that is, ethics that varies by paradigm and culture (Ryen, 2004). The extension of ethical codes will only continue as more work begins to be conducted using social media and the Internet. Similarly, ethical concerns are being discussed with the advent of archiving research data. This entry moves through the background of ethical codes before discussing principles and ethical practice and debates in the...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2008). Ethics in qualitative research. In C. Willig & W. Stainton-Rogers (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Psychological Society. (2010). Code of human research ethics. Leicester, UK: BPS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burman, E. (1997). Minding the gap: Positivism, psychology, and the politics of qualitative methods. Journal of Social Issues, 53, 785–801.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, K. (2004). Qualitative research, reflexivity and content. In M. Murray (Ed.) Critical health psychology. Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doucet, A., & Mauthner, N. S. (2012). Knowing responsibly: Linking ethics, research practice and epistemology. In T. Miller, M. Birch, M. Mauthner, & J. Jessop (Eds.), Ethics in qualitative research (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R., & Pollner, E. (1988). On the uses of members’ responses to researchers’ accounts. Human Organization, 47, 189–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1995). Ethnography: Principles in practice (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, A. (1981). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms. In H. Roberts (Ed.), Doing feminist research. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, O., & Mauthner, N. S. (2004). Whose data are they anyway? Practical, legal and ethical issues in archiving qualitative research data. Sociology, 38, 139–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryen, A. (2004). Ethical Issues. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willig, C. (2012). Qualitative interpretation and analysis in psychology. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Online Resources

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abigail Locke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Locke, A. (2014). Research Ethics, Overview. In: Teo, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_356

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_356

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5582-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5583-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics