Skip to main content

Revolution

  • Reference work entry
  • 225 Accesses

Introduction

The concept of revolution has proved to be, and perhaps continues to be, one of the most problematic in the social sciences. One of the reasons for this is due to its highly emotive nature. ‘Revolution’ conjures a variety of signifiers, ranging from a brutal and sudden surge into the unknown, to an irresistible and progressive doorway into the future. Its usage today is intrinsically tied, one way or another, to the notion of modernity, particularly – although not exclusively – in relation to radical social and/or political change. Since the early nineteenth century there have been continual attempts to understand this phenomenon, and although for some the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 marked a post-revolutionary turning point, two decades later, the so-called ‘Arab Spring’ (2010-) suggests otherwise.

Definition

Providing one clear-cut definition of revolution proves hard due to their historical variability. One particularly important distinction, however, is between...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Arendt, H. (1990). On revolution. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinton, C. (1938/1965). The anatomy of revolution: New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J. C. (1962). Toward a theory of revolution. American Sociological Review, 27(1), 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFronzo, J. (1996). Revolutions and revolutionary movements (2nd ed.). Oxford, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foran, J. (2005). Taking power: On the origins of third world revolutions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone, J. (1982). The comparative and historical study of revolutions. Annual Review of Sociology, 8, 187–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone, J. (2001). Toward a fourth generation of revolutionary theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 4, 139–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone, J. (2011). Understanding the revolutions of 2011: Weaknesses and resilience in Middle Eastern Autocracies. Foreign Affairs, 90(3), 8–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2009). Commonwealth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, J. (2002). Change the world without taking power: The meaning of revolution today. London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. (1966). Revolutionary change. Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nepstad, S. E. (2011). Nonviolent revolutions: Civil resistance in the late 20th century. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selbin, E. (2010). Revolution, rebellion, resistance: The power of story. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, T. (1979). States and social revolutions. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (1978). From mobilization to revolution. Reading, MA: Addision-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oliver Harrison .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Harrison, O. (2014). Revolution. In: Teo, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_269

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_269

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5582-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5583-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics