Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology

2014 Edition
| Editors: Thomas Teo

Researcher-Participant Relationship

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_267

Introduction

When psychologists conduct research with humans, a professional relationship exists between two parties – psychological investigators and participants – who share a common humanity. Such relationships have a history of diverse social arrangements that evoke different epistemological and ethical, perhaps political meanings. For most of the discipline’s history mainstream psychologists have organized researcher-participant relationships hierarchically in pursuit of methodological objectivity when conducting research. Yet, from a critical perspective, beyond their relatively objective aspects, researcher-participant relationships in psychology are saturated with intersubjective influence and can be reconstructed along participatory lines.

Definition

The term, researcher-participant relationships, refers to the relationship between psychological investigators, on the one hand, and the individuals who provide data, on the other hand. This relationship specifies functions and...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

References

  1. Baumrind, D. (1964). Some thoughts on ethics of research: After reading Milgram’s “behavioral study of obedience. American Psychologist, 19, 421–423.Google Scholar
  2. Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Kelman, H. C. (1972). The rights of the subject in social research: An analysis in terms of relative power and legitimacy. American Psychologist, 27, 989–1016.Google Scholar
  4. Koch, S., & Leary, D. E. (Eds.). (1985). A century of psychology as science. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  5. Kusch, M. (1995). Recluse, interlocutor, interrogator: Natural and social order in turn-of-the-century psychological research schools. ISIS, 86, 419–433.Google Scholar
  6. Morawski, J. (2007). Scientific selves: Discerning the subject and the experimenter in experimental psychology in the United States, 1900–1935. In M. G. Ash & T. Sturm (Eds.), Psychology’s territories: Historical and contemporary perspectives from different disciplines (pp. 129–148). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  7. Rosenzweig, S. (1933). The experimental situation as a psychological problem. Psychological Review, 40, 337–354.Google Scholar
  8. Walsh-Bowers, R. (1995). The reporting and ethics of the research relationship in areas of interpersonal psychology, 1939–89. Theory & Psychology, 5, 233–250.Google Scholar

Online Resource

  1. Kurt Danziger. www.kurtdanziger.com

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWilfrid Laurier UniversityWaterlooCanada