Introduction
Over the last half century, reflexivity has received attention across the human sciences although far less so in psychology than in its kindred disciplines. In the broadest, epistemological meaning, reflexivity refers to the back-and-forth process whereby an account of reality depends on preexisting knowledge of that account. This sense of the concept acknowledges that the knower and knowledge generated cannot be fully separated. Within the human sciences, where the knower and the object to be known are of the same kind (human beings), reflexivity has additional meanings since any knowledge about humans attained through human science inquiry refers to the human observers as well as the human objects of observation. This particular epistemological understanding of reflexivity is not the only one for across the human sciences, psychology included; reflexivity thus has acquired several meanings. The term has been used to refer to an inescapable epistemological condition, a...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Ashmore, M. (1989). The reflexive thesis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Brinkman, K. (2005). Consciousness, self-consciousness, and the modern self. History of the Human Sciences, 18(4), 27–48.
Brenninkmeijer, J. (2010). Taking care of one’s brain: How manipulating the brain changes people’s selves. History of the Human Sciences, 23(1), 107–126.
Capshew, J. (1999). Psychologists on the march: Science, practice, and professional identity in American, 1929–1969. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Choudhury, S., & Slaby, J. (2012). Critical neuroscience: A handbook of the social and cultural contexts of neuroscience. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Cohen-Cole, J. N. (2005). The reflexivity of cognitive science: The (cognitive) scientist as model of nature. History of the Human Sciences, 18(4), 107–139.
Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gouldner, A. (1970). The coming crisis of western sociology. New York: Basic Books.
Gruenberg, B. (1978). The problem of reflexivity in the sociology of science. Philosophy of Social Science, 8, 321–342.
Hacking, I. (1995). The looping effect of human kinds. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & A. J. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 351–383). Oxford: Clarendon.
James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Holt.
Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. New York: Routledge.
MacIntyre, A. (1985). How psychology makes itself true –or false. In S. Koch & D. E. Leary (Eds.), A century of psychology as science (pp. 897–903). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Mazlish, B. (1998). The uncertain sciences. New Haven: Yale University Press.
McKenzie, D., Muniesa, F., & Siu, L. (2007). Do economists make markets? On the performativity of economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
McMylor, P. (2005). Reflexive historical sociology: Consciousness, experience and the author. History of the Human Sciences, 18(4), 141–160.
Morawski, J. G. (1992). Self regard and other regard: Reflexive practices in American psychology, 1890–1940. Science in Context, 5, 281–308.
Morawski, J. (2005). Reflexivity and the psychologist. History of the Human Sciences, 18(4), 77–105.
Oliver, W. D., & Langfield, A. W. (1962). Reflexivity: An unfaced issue of psychology. Journal of Individual Psychology, 18(2), 114–124.
Richards, G. (2002). The psychology of psychology: A historically grounded sketch. Theory and Psychology, 12(1), 7–36.
Sandywell, B. (1996). Reflexivity and the crisis of western reason: Logological investigations volume 1. New York: Routledge.
Smith, R. (2005). Does reflexivity separate the human sciences from the natural sciences? History of the Human Sciences, 18(4), 1–25.
Unger, R. K. (1983). Through the looking glass: No wonderland yet (The reciprocal relationship between methodology and models of reality). Psychology of Women Quarterly, 8, 9–32.
Wilkinson, S. (1988). The role of reflexivity in feminist psychology. Women’s Studies International Forum, 11(5), 493–502.
Woolgar, S. (1988). Knowledge and reflexivity. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this entry
Cite this entry
Morawski, J. (2014). Reflexivity. In: Teo, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_263
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_263
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5582-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5583-7
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Sciences