Clinical Applications of Robots in Autism Spectrum Disorder Diagnosis and Treatment
Advances in socially assistive robotics have the potential to promote innovation in the diagnosis and treatment of individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Research has revealed that individuals with ASD (1) show strengths in understanding the physical, object-related world and weaknesses in understanding the social world, (2) are more responsive to feedback given by a computer than a human, and (3) are more interested in treatment involving technology/robots. These findings suggest that a co-robot therapist may be an important addition to clinical assessment and/or therapy if it can emulate certain human therapist functions. Still, the majority of research in this area to date has focused on the development of technology, with scant attention paid to best practice clinical approaches. Therefore, the clinical use of robots for ASD should be considered an experimental approach to diagnosis and/or treatment until rigorous clinical trials are conducted and replicated. The end of this section includes a roadmap for future research on the clinical uses for robots in the diagnosis and treatment of individuals with ASD. Crucially, clinical innovation must parallel technological innovation if this approach is to become an accepted diagnostic and/or treatment approach for ASD.
- Barakova EI. Robots for social training of autistic children. Empowering therapists in intensive training programs. In: Abraham et al. editors. Proceedings of IEEE WICT 2011, pp. 14–19Google Scholar
- Feil-Seifer D, Matarić MJ. Using robots to augment (not replace) people in therapeutic settings. Refereed workshop: robotics: science and system; 2011; Los Angeles.Google Scholar
- Feil-Seifer D, Matarić MJ. Defining socially assistive robotics. International conference on rehabilitation robotics; 2005; Chicago. p. 465–8.Google Scholar
- Gillesen J, Barakova EI, Huskens BE, Feijs LM. From training to robot behavior: towards custom scenarios for robotics in training programs for ASD. IEEE Rehab Robotics. 2011; 387–93.Google Scholar
- Hollerback JM, Mason MT, Christensen HI. A roadmap for U.S. robotics – from internet to robotics. Updated 2009. http://wwww.us-robotics.us. Accessed 1 Mar 2012.
- Lord C, Rutter M, DiLavore PC, Risi S. Autism diagnostic observation schedule. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services; 1999.Google Scholar
- Lund HH, Pederson MD, Beck R. Modular robotic tiles: experiments for children with autism. Art Life Robotics. 2009;13:393–400.Google Scholar
- Robins B, Dautenhahn K, te Boekhorst R, Billard A. Robotic assistants in therapy and education of children with autism: can a small humanoid robot encourage social interaction skills? Univ Access Inform Soc. 2005;4:115–20.Google Scholar
- Villano M, Crowell CR, Wier K, et al. DOMER: A wizard of oz interface for using interactive robots to scaffold social skills for children with autism spectrum disorders. ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction; 2011. p. 279–80.Google Scholar