Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship

2013 Edition
| Editors: Elias G. Carayannis

Principal–Agent Model in Universities, Problems and Solutions

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_507

Synonyms

Introduction

The modern day university acts as a powerhouse of indirect economic activity that stems from the scientific discoveries, inventions, and innovations that university scientists develop. Bearing in mind that it is hard to assess the potential of novel discoveries, the university is facing the so-called principal–agent problem in the way it incentivizes the research of faculty members.

Definition of the Principal–Agent Problem

The principal–agent problem (henceforth PA problem), which is also known as the agency dilemma, concerns the difficulties in motivating one party (the agent), to act on behalf of another (the principal). In universities, the PA problem is manifested in (1) the way the university motivates faculty research and (2) in the way the university motivates disclosure of faculty inventions to the university Technology Transfer Office (TTO), which is also known as Technology Licensing Office (TLO). The role of the TTO...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Binmore K. Fun and games. Toronto: D.C. Heath and Company; 1992.Google Scholar
  2. Hayter C. In search of the profit-maximizing actor: motivations and definitions of success from nascent academic entrepreneurs. J Technol Transf. 2011;36:340–52.Google Scholar
  3. Lach S, Schankerman M. Royalty sharing and technology transfer in universities. J Eur Econ Assoc. 2004;2:252–64.Google Scholar
  4. Markman G, Balkin D, Phan P, Gianiodis P. Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer. J Bus Ventur. 2005a;20:241–63.Google Scholar
  5. Markman G, Gianiodis P, Phan P, Balkin D. Innovation speed: transferring university technology to market. Res Policy. 2005b;34:1058–75.Google Scholar
  6. Markman G, Panagopoulos A, Gianiodis P. Scientists or entrepreneurs: rent (mis)appropriation from discoveries made in university labs. Best Paper Proceedings of the American Academy of Management, 2007.Google Scholar
  7. Markman G, Gianodis P, Panagopoulos A. Opportunistic behavior in research organizations. Best paper proceedings of the American academy of management (2012)Google Scholar
  8. Panagopoulos A, Carayannis E. A policy for enhancing the disclosure of university faculty invention. J Technol Transf. (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  9. Siegel D, Waldman D, Link A. Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study. Res Policy. 2003a;32:27–48.Google Scholar
  10. Siegel D, Waldman D, Atwater L, Link A. Commercial knowledge transfer from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university-industry collaboration. J High Technol Manage Res. 2003b;14:111–33.Google Scholar
  11. Siegel D, Waldman D, Atwater L, Link A. Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. J Eng Technol Manag. 2004;21:115–42.Google Scholar
  12. Thursby J, Thursby M. Are faculty critical? Their role in university licensing. Contemp Econ Policy. 2004;22:162–78.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CreteRethymnonGreece