Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship pp 73–116Cite as

Applied Design Thinking Lab and Creative Empowering of Interdisciplinary Teams

  • Reference work entry

Synonyms

Art education; Creativity; Design education; Entrepreneurship; Innovation; Innovation diplomacy; Invention; Social design; Work in teams

Introduction

Thanks to all my students and colleagues and especially my daughter Iuna and my husband Tommy.

Ruth Mateus-Berr

Evolution of the Applied Design Thinking Lab (ADTL), Vienna

The Applied Design Thinking Lab (ADTL), Vienna, is situated at the University of Applied Arts in Vienna and was founded by the author in 2009. It might be understood as an application model for universities, companies and institutions of all kind, as it can be considered as a “hypothesis and action model.” Since 2004, the author followed the vision of inter/transdisciplinary work with diverse institutions, universities, and companies (which will be described in chapter Previous Projects), cooperation instead of “single combat” was the strategy.

ADTL approaches inter/transdisciplinary topics with interdisciplinary teams from different departments of...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   1,100.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bast G. Maths goes design. Kunst/Wien: Universität für angewandte, In-house publishers Angewandte; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer CA, editor. User generated content – Urheberrechtliche Zulässigkeit nutzergenerierter Medieninhalte. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belbin RM. The management of teams: why they succeed or fail. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science & Technology; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belbin RM. Team roles: http://www.belbin.com/rte.asp?id=396. 2012

  • Boradkar P. Designing things. A critical introduction to the culture of objects. Oxford/New York: Berg Publishers; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgdorff H. The conflict of the faculties. Perspectives on artistic research and academia. Leiden: University Press; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P. Sozialer Sinn, Kritik der theoretischen Vernunft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs J, Peat FD. Die Entdeckung des Chaos. Eine Reise durch die Chaos-Theorie. München: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown T. Change by design. How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. New York: HarperCollins; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown T. Harv Bus Rev 86 (6): 84-92, 141. 2008. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18605031. Accessed 30 Sept 2011.

  • Bryman A. The disneyzation, of society. London/Los Angeles/London/New Delhi/Signapore/Washington, DC: Sage; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buxton B, Sheelagh C, Greenberg S, Marquardt N. Sketching user experiences. Waltham: Elsevier/Morgan Kaufmann; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis EG. The strategic management of technological learning. Learning to learn and learning to learn-how-to-learn as drivers of strategic choice and firm performance in global, technology-driven markets. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis EG. Measuring intangibles: managing intangibles for tangible outcomes in research and innovation. Int J Nucl Know Manag. 2004;1(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ. “Mode 3” and “Quadruple helix”: toward a 21st-century fractal innovation ecosystem. Int J Technol Manag. 2009; 46(3/4), 201–234. http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=27%26year=2009%26vol = 46%26issue = 3/4. Accessed 25 July 2012.

  • Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ. Mode 3 knowledge: production in Quadruple helix innovation systems. 21st-Century Democracy, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship for Development,. New York: Springer; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky N. On certain formal properties of grammars. Inform Control. 1959;2:137–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke A. Design anthropology. Object culture in the 21st century, Edition Angewandte, Springer, New York; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins H. Tacit and explicit knowledge. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell RR. Global climate and infectious disease: the cholera paradigm. Science. 1996; 274 (5295), 2025–2031. DOI: 10.1126/science.274.5295.2025, PMID:8953025.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall R. Design thinking summer session. Resource document Stanford d.school k12 LAB. 2013. http://dschool.stanford.edu/use-our-methods/. Accessed 25 Jan 2013.

  • Cross N. Designerly ways of knowing. London: Springer; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross N. Design thinking. Oxford/New York: Berg Publishers; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross N, Christiaans H, Dorst K. Analysing design activity. Chichester: Wiley; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • d.school. Hasso Plattner Institute of Design at Stanford. http://dschool.stanford.edu/. © 2013 Stanford University Institute of Design. Accessed 25 Jan 2013.

  • Dalrymple J, Miller W. Interdisciplinarity: a key for real-world learning. Planet No. 17, GEES Subject Centre, University of Plymouth, Plymouth; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta S. Creativity in invention and design. Cambridge: University Press, Denkschule; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bono E. De Bonos neue Denkschule. Heidelberg: mvgVerlag; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze G, Guattari F. A Thousand Plateaus. London/New York: Continuum International; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeWachter M. Interdisciplinary team work. J Med Ethics. 1976; 2. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2495117/. Accessed 11 Sept 2011.

  • Dewey J. Democracy and education. A Penn State Electronic Classics Series Publication (2001) (electronic). Hazleton, USA: Pennsylvania State University. 1916. http://www2.hn.psu.edu/faculty/jmanis/johndewey/dem% 26ed.pdf. Accessed 25 Aug 2011.

  • Dilts R. Strategies of a genius, vol. 1. California: Meta Publications; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douven I. “Abduction”, The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Spring 2011 ed. Zalta EN, editor. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2011/entries/abduction/. Accessed 29 Apr 2011.

  • Drosdowski G, Müller W, Scholze-Stubenrecht W, Wermke M (Hg.) DUDEN, Das Herkunftswörterbuch. Etymologie der deutschen Sprache. Bd.7., Meyers Lexikonverlag, Mannheim, Wien, Zürich; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dursun P. Architectural theory and spatial analysis. An analytical tool for thinking and talking about space. Proceedings: eighth international space syntax symposium, Santiago, PUC, Chile. 2012. http://www.sss8.cl/proceedings/. Accessed 13 May 2011.

  • Edison T. http://www.nps.gov/edis/index.htm. Accessed 28 April 2012.

  • Ellin N. Postmodern urbanism. New York: Princeton Architectural Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein S. Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. Am Psychol. 1994;49:709–724. Ed. Norman B. Anderson. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.49.8.709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frayling C. Research in art and design. In: Royal College of Art Research Papers, 1/1; 1993/1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller B. Bedienungsanleitung für das Raumschiff. Erde und andere Schriften. Hg. Joachim Krausse. Amsterdam, Dresden: Verlag der Kunst; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow M. The production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goel V. Sketches of thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Göker MH. The effects of experience during design problem solving. Des Stud. 1997;18(4):DOI:10.1016/S0142-694X(97)00009-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt G. The dialectics of sketching. Creat Res J. 1991;1(2):123–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild P. Deleuze and Guattari: an introduction to the politics of desire. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon WJJ. Synectics. New York: Harper & Row; 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graffitti P. 1968. http://www.gerard-aime.com/phototheque/picture.php?/10617/category/2194. Accessed 11 May 2011.

  • Greenbaum J, Kyng M, editors. Design at work: cooperative design of computer systems. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes JR. Cognitive psychology: thinking and creating. Homewood/Belmont: Dorsey Press; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger M. Being and time (trans. J. Stambaugh). Albany: State University of New York Press; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huq A, Xu B, Chowdhury MAR, Islam MS, Montilla R, Colwell RR. A simple filtration method to remove plankton-associated Vibrio cholerae in raw water supplies in developing countries. AEM Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996, 2509–2512, PMCID: PMC168033.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huq A, Yunus M, Sohel SS, Bhuiya A, Emch M, Luby S, Russek-Cohen E, Nair GB, Sacke RB, Colwell RR. Simple sari cloth filtration of water is sustainable and continues to protect villagers from cholera in Matlab, Bangladesh, DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00034-10 18 May 2010 mBio vol. 1 no. 1 e00034-10 http://mbio.asm.org/content/1/1/e00034-10.full. Accessed 1May 2012.

  • Johnson M, Lakoff G. Leben in Metaphern. Konstruktion und Gebrauch von Sprachbildern. Heidelberg: Carl-Auer Verlag; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones M. 2010. http://nearfuturelaboratory.com/pasta-and-vinegar/2010/02/19/matt-jones-on-mujicomp-and-mujicompfrastructures-at-technoark/. Accessed 26 July 2012.

  • Kandel E. In search of memory. New York: Norton; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant I. Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Stuttgart: Reclam; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley T, Littmann J. The art of innovation: lessons in creativity from IDEO, America‘s leading design firm. New York: Currency Book; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimbell R, Stables K, Zeidler D. Researching design learning issues and findings from two decades of research and development, Science and technology education library, vol. 34. New York: Springer; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein JT. Interdisciplinarity: history, theory and practice. Detroit: Wayne State University Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein JT. Creating interdisciplinary campus cultures. A model for strenghth and sustainability. San Francisco: Wiley Imprint; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koskinen I, Zimmerman J, Binder T, Redström J, Wensveen S. Design research through practice. From the lab, field, and showroom. Waltham: Elsevier; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorf K. The semantic turn. A new foundation for design. Boca Raton: Taylor %26 Francis; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen T. The physical context of creativity. Creat Innov Manag. 2004; 14, Nr. 2, 89–96. DOI: 10.1111/j.0963-1690.2004.00297.x. Accessed 3 Sept 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubie KS. The neurotic atortion of the creative process. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press; 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurel B, editor. Design research, methods and perspectives. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson B. How designers think. The design process demystified. Amsterdam/Boston/Heidelberg/London/New York/Oxford/Paris/San Diego/San Francisco/Singapore/Sydney/Tokio: Elsevier Ltd. 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laysiepen U. (Ulay), Mateus-Berr R. Earth water catalogue. 2011. http://www.earthwatercatalogue.net/#project/181. Accessed 1 Apr 2012.

  • Laysiepen (Ulay) U, Earth water catalogue. http://www.earthwatercatalogue.net/#project/181. Accessed 1 May 2012.

  • Lieshout AV. Teamrollenprofil nach Selbsteinschätzung. The good, the bad + the ugly. Rotterdam: NAi Publishers; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood T, editor. Design thinking. Integrating innovation, customer experience, and brand value. New York: Allworth Press; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maciver F, O’Driscoll A. Consultancy designer involvement in new product development in mature product categories: who leads, the designer or the marketer? 2010. www.drs2010.umontreal.ca/data/PDF/077.pdf. Accessed 1 April 2012.

  • Maddalena G. Guessing or reasoning? A philosophical account of hypothesis. In: de Almeida UB, Rojo J, editors. Euresis, Association for the Promotion of the Scientific Endeavour, Vol. 1 Summer 2011. 2011. http://www.scribd.com/doc/98312138/The-Event-of-Discovery. Accessed 13. July 2012.

  • Mareis C. The nature of design. In: Mareis C, Joost G, Kimpel K (Hg.), entwerfen, wissen, produzieren. Designforschung im Anwendungskontext, transcript Verlag, Bielefeld; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin R. The design of business. Why design thinking is the next competitive advantage. Boston: Harvard Business Press; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin B, Hanington B. Universal methods of design. 100 ways to research complex problems, develop innovative ideas, and design effective solutions. Beverly: Rockport; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mateus-Berr R, Laysiepen U. Ulay, Earth water catalogue. 2011. http://www.earthwatercatalogue.net/#project/181. Accessed 1 April 2012.

  • Matt G. Get together. Kunst als Teamwork. Wien/Bozen: Folio Verlag; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mers A. Transferdiskurse zr Künstlerpositionen, Kreativindustrien, Kreativität, Innovation, Ästhetik und Diagrammatik, In: Tröndle M (Hg.) Kunstforschung als ästhetische Wissenschaft, Beiträge zur transdisziplinären Hybridiesierung von Wissenschaft und Kunst, transcript Verlag, Bielefeld; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell W.J.T. Interdisciplinarity and visual culture. The Art Bulletin, 77(4), In: Winters T, Interdisciplinarity and Design Education. Conference Proceedings: copyright © 2009 Swinburne University of Technology and RMIT University. Conference Cumulus 38, Hemispheric Shifts across learning, teaching and research. Published in Melbourne, Australia by Swinburne University of Technology and RMIT University; 2009. http://www.swinburne.edu.au/lib/ir/onlineconferences/cumulus/welcome.htm. Accessed 10 Sept 2011.

  • Mittelstraß J. Art and research: an introduction. In: Rittermann J, Bast G, Mittelstraß J, editors. Kunst und Forschung/Art and research. Wien: Springer; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan N, Saxton J. Asking better questions. Ontario: Pembroke; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. Scientific interfaces and technological applications. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. Interdisciplinary research: promoting collaboration between the life sciences and medicine and the physical sciences and engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newbury D. Research training in the creative arts and design. In: Biggs M, Karlsson H, editors. The Routledge companion to research in the Arts. Routledge/London/New York: Taylor %26 Francis; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I, Takeuchi H. Die Organisation des Wissens. Wie japanische Unternehmen eine brachliegende Ressource nutzbar machen. Frankfurt am Main, New York: Campus Verlag; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ormerod TC. Planning and ill-defined problems. In: Morris R, Ward G, editors. The cognitive psychology of planning. London: Psychology Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn AF. Your creative power. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons; 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn AF. Applied imagination. principles and procedures of creative problem-solving. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons; 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papanek V (F. Pumhösl, T. Geisler, M. Fineder, G. Bast, (Hg.)). Design für die reale Welt. Anleitungen für eine humane Ökologie und sozialen Wandel. Edition Angewandte. Wien: Springer; 1973/2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parnes SJ. Can creativitybe increased? In: Parnea SJ, Harding HF, editors. A source book for creative thinking. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons; 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parnes SJ, Noller RB, Biondi AM. Guide to creative action. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons; 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry. 2007. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/episteme-techne/. Accessed 15 July 2012.

  • Peirce CS. Collected papers. Vols. 1–8, Hartshorne C, Weiss P, Burks AW, editors. Havard University Press, Cambridge, MA; 1935–1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peran M. Interview in: dérive (Pamela Bartar) Stadtplanungen in der Post-It City. Von Barcelona bis Valparaiso oder Wien. Dérive 38 Zeitschrift für Stadtforschung. Artikel aus der Ausgabe 33. 2008. http://www.derive.at/index.php?p_case=2%26id_cont=752%26issue_No=33. Accessed 16 July 2009.

  • Peters S. Der Vortrag als performance, transcript. Bielefeld: Verlag; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plattner H, Meinel C, Weinberg U. Design thinking. Innovationen lernen, Ideenwelten öffnen, Wirtschaftsbuch. München: Finanzbuch Verlag GmbH; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi M. The logic of tacit inference. In: Grene M, editor. Knowing and being: essays by michael polanyi. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press; 1966. p. 140–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi M. The tacit dimension. London/Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad CK, Ramaswamy V. Future of competition: co-creating unique value with customers. Harvard Business Press Books. Pn.9535-SRN-ENG. 2004. http://cb.hbsp.harvard.edu/cb/search/cocreation%2520prahalad%2520ramaswamy?Ntk=HEMainSearch%26N=0. Accessed 23 April 2011.

  • Raymond M. The trend Forecaster’s handbook. London: Laurence King; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhea D. Bringing clarity to the “Fuzzy front end”. A predictable process for innovation. In: Laurel B, editor. Design research. Methods and perspectives. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribot T. Essays on the creative imagination. London: Routledge %26 Kegan Paul; 1906.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle G. The concept of mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider G. In: Klein JT, editor. Interdisciplinary campus cultures. A model for strength and sustainability. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2010 xv.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuler D, Namioka A. Participatory design, principles and practices. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön DA. The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in action. Cambridge: Perseus Books; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennet R. Handwerk. Berlin: Berlin Verlag; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinozaki J, Cavagnaro LB. d.school brainstorming rules. 2009. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1h5L_0rFz8. Accessed 29 April 2012.

  • Simon HA. The sciences of the artificial. 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1969/2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spearman CE. Creative mind. London/Cambridge: University Press; 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperri RE. Nobelprize. 1981. http://www.nobelprize.org/mediaplayer/index.php?id=1606. Accessed 18 March 2012.

  • Stephan PF. Wissen und Nicht-Wissen im Entwurf. In: Mareis C, Joost G, Kimpel K, editors. Entwerfen wissen produzieren. Designforschung im Anwenderkontext, transcript Verlag, Bielefeld; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes DE. Pasteur’s quadrant. Basic science and technology innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan LH. The tall office building artistically considered. First published in Lippinicott’s Magazine 57, (1896) http://de.scribd.com/doc/104764188/Louis-Sullivan-The-Tall-Office-Building-Artistically-Considered. Accessed 26 Jan 2012.

  • Sullivan G. Art practice as research, inquiry in visual arts. Washington DC/ Los Angeles/London/New Delhi/Signapore: Sage; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance EP. Understanding creativity: where to start? In: Psychological inquiry, Bd. 4, Nr. 3, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah. 1993, http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=1047-840X%281993%294%3A3%3C232%3AUCWTS%3E2.0.CO%3B2-O. Accessed 26 July 2012.

  • Veryzer W, Borja de Mozota B. The impact of user-orientated design on new product development. An examination of fundamental relationships. J Prod Innov Manag. 2005;22(2):128–43. doi:10.1111/j.0737-6782.2005.00110.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel EV. Democratizing innovation. Cambridge/London: The MIT Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wake L. NLP. Principles in practice. St. Albans: Ecedemy Press; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallas G. The art of thought. New York: Harcourt Brace; 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingardt M. Fehler zeichnen uns aus. Transdisziplinäre Grundlagen zur Theorie und Produktivität des Fehlers in Schule und Arbeitswelt. Bad Heilbrunn: Verlag Julius Klinkhardt; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener N. Kybernetik. Regelung und Nachrichtenübertragung in Lebewesen und Maschine. Hamburg: Rowohlt Verlag; 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilde O, An ideal husband. “mrs. cheveley. (To herself) How thoughtful of him! To expect the unexpected shows a thoroughly modern intellect”. 1895. http://www.gutenberg.org/files/885/885-h/885-h.htm. Accessed 29 April 2012.

  • World Health Organization 2011, 86, 325–340, 29 July 2011, 86th year / 29 juiLLET 2011, 86e année No. 31, 2011, 86, 325–340 http://www.who.int/wer (Zugegriffen am 1.2.2012).

Links

Participants and Experts. 2009: Math %26 Art %26 Design: The way Polynomiography things go

  • Performed at the conference: DIMACS, Rutgers University NJ, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Participants: Petra Ilias, Walter Lunzer, Ao. Univ.-Prof. Ruth Mateus-Berr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mentor/experts: Prof. Bahman Kalantari, Prof. Georg Glaeser, Prof. Reinhart Winkler, Prof. James Skone.

    Google Scholar 

Participants and Experts. 2010: Maths Goes Design

  • Performed at the Bridges Conference (Mathematics, Music, Art, Architecture, Culture) 2010, Pécs, Hungary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Participants: Konrad Cernohous, Mag. Walter Lunzer, Dominik Gross, Prof. Jonathan Farley, ao.Univ.-Prof. Ruth Mateus-Berr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mentors/experts: Prof. Jonathan Farley, Dr. Michael Schreiber, Sebastian Prantl, Prof. James Skone, Franz Morgenbesser.

    Google Scholar 

Participants and Experts. 2011: Math Goes Wherever/Math Goes Fashion

  • Performed at the Wiskunst Conference 2011, Sint Lucas University Gent, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Participants: Konrad Cernohous, Mag. Petra Ilias, Mag. Walter Lunzer, Dominik Gross, Jasmin Schaitl, ao. Univ.-Prof. Ruth Mateus-Berr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mentors/experts: Prof. Dirk Huylebrouck, Prof. Reza Sharangi, Vy Hart, Prof. Reinhart Winkler, Prof. Kristof Fenyvesi, Dr. Michael Schreiber, Christian Leeb, Franz Morgenbesser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Performed at the Bridges Conference (Mathematics, Music, Art, Architecture, Culture) 2011, University of Coimbra, Portugal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Participants: Konrad Cernohous, Mag. Petra Ilias, Dominik Gross, Jasmin Schaitl, Klaudia Kozma, ao. Univ.-Prof. Ruth Mateus-Berr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Performed at Pecha Kucha Night Vienna, Vienna Design Week.

    Google Scholar 

  • Participants: Konrad Cernohous, Mag. Petra Ilias, Mag. Walter Lunzer, Dominik Gross, Jasmin Schaitl, Klaudia Kozma, Prof. Michael P. Schultes, ao. Univ.-Prof. Ruth Mateus-Berr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mentors/experts: Prof. Reinhart Winkler, Dr. Michael Schreiber, Prof. Georg Glaeser.

    Google Scholar 

Participants and Experts. 2012: Applied Design Thinking Lab. 4 Layers of Sari

  • Performed at: Teacher’s Academy ELIA, University of Porto 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Participants: Cornelia Bast, Dr. Elisabeth Geymüller, Klaudia Kozma, László Lukács, ao. Univ.-Prof. Ruth Mateus-Berr, Prof. P. Michael Schultes, Marie-Theres-Wakonig.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Art Sciences and Art Education, Institute of Art & Society, University of Applied Arts Vienna, Oskar Kokoschkaplatz 2, 1010, Vienna, Austria

    Mag. art. Dr. phil. Ruth Mateus-Berr (University Professor)

Authors
  1. Mag. art. Dr. phil. Ruth Mateus-Berr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruth Mateus-Berr .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information Systems & Technology, Management, School of Business, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA

    Elias G. Carayannis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Mateus-Berr, R. (2013). Applied Design Thinking Lab and Creative Empowering of Interdisciplinary Teams. In: Carayannis, E.G. (eds) Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_437

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_437

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-3857-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-3858-8

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation