Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship

2013 Edition
| Editors: Elias G. Carayannis

Preparing Students for Learning Through Invention Activities

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_403

Introduction

Different forms of instruction are better suited to different learning outcomes. For example, repetition is commonly used for developing motor skills and reinforcement is commonly used for fostering desired attitudes or behaviors. Regardless of the specific pedagogy used, humans generate knowledge and meaning from an interaction between their experiences and their ideas. Many educational settings make it difficult for students to make this connection. For example, some disciplines focus mostly on problem-solving routines, but instruction in problem-solving routines is unlikely to prepare students for many other situations they are likely to encounter. Instead of focusing exclusively on problem-solving techniques, instruction should also focus on students’ abilities to learn from new situations and resources. Preparing students for future learning, arguably the greatest educational outcome an instructor could hope to achieve, requires the development of new instructional...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Barnett SM, Ceci SJ. When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychol Bull. 2002;128:612–37.Google Scholar
  2. Bransford JD. How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.Google Scholar
  3. Bransford JD, Schwartz DL. Rethinking transfer: a simple proposal with multiple implications. Rev Res Educ. 1999;24:61–100.Google Scholar
  4. Day J, Nakahara H, Bonn D. Teaching standard deviation by building from student invention. Phys Teach. 2010;48(8):546–8.Google Scholar
  5. Ericsson KA. The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006.Google Scholar
  6. Holmes NG. The invention support environment: using metacognitive scaffolding and interactive learning environments to improve learning from invention (thesis). Vancouver (BC): University of British Columbia; 2011.Google Scholar
  7. Lajoie SP. Extending the scaffolding metaphor. Instr Sci. 2005;33:541–57.Google Scholar
  8. Reiser BJ. Scaffolding complex learning: the mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. J Learn Sci. 2004;13(3):273–304.Google Scholar
  9. Roll I, Aleven V, Koedinger KR, et al. The invention lab: using a hybrid of model tracing and constraint-based modeling to offer intelligent support in inquiry environments. In: Aleven V, Kay J, Mostow J, editors. Proceedings of the international conference on intelligent tutoring systems. Berlin: Springer; 2010. p. 115–24.Google Scholar
  10. Schwartz DL, Martin T. Inventing to prepare for future learning: the hidden efficiency of encouraging original student production in statistics instruction. Cogn Instr. 2004;22(2):129–84.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physics and AstronomyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada