Introduction
In his 2011 State of the Union Address, President Obama captured the essence of recent national blue ribbon panels and the conclusions of many economists: “We need to out-innovate, out-educate, and out-build the rest of the world” he said. But to create a workforce with enhanced critical and creative thinking skills, we need to train experts in science and engineering who can find innovative solutions to problems. Scientists and engineers in the laboratory or field frequently encounter ill-structured problems that can have many solutions and multiple solution paths. To approach such problems, “higher order” mental operations are crucial. These include analysis, synthesis, and abstraction but in addition, creative thinking, which according to Bloom’s taxonomy of learning skills is the most complex and abstract of the higher order cognitive skills (Krathwohl 2002). It is creative thinking that...
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
DeHaan RL. Teaching creativity and inventive problem solving in science. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2009;8(3):172–81 (http://www.lifescied.org/cgi/reprint/8/3/172).
DeHaan RL. Teaching creative science thinking. Science. 2011;234:1499–500.
Felder RM, Brent R. Active learning: an introduction. ASQ High Educ Brief. 2009;2(4):1–5.
Gardner H. Creating minds: an anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Ghandi. New York: Harper Collins; 1993.
Handelsman J, Miller S, Pfund C. Scientific teaching. New York: Freeman; 2007.
Kaufman JC, Beghetto RA. Exploring mini-C: creativity across cultures. In: DeHaan RL, Narayan KMV, editors. Education for innovation: implications for India, China and America. Rotterdam: Sense; 2008. p. 165–80.
Krathwohl DR. A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: an overview. Theory Pract. 2002;41(4):212–8.
Nersessian NJ. Creating scientific concepts. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books; 2010.
Ruiz-Primo MA, Briggs D, Iverson H, Talbot R, Shepard LA. Impact of undergraduate science course innovations on learning. Science. 2011;331:1269–70 (11 Mar 2011).
Scott G, Leritz LE, Mumford MD. The effectiveness of creativity training: a quantitative review. Creativity Res J. 2004;16:361–88.
Subramaniam K, Kounios J, Parrish TB, Jung-Beeman M. A brain mechanism for facilitation of insight by positive affect. J Cogn Neurosci. 2009;21(3):415–32.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media LLC
About this entry
Cite this entry
DeHaan, R.L. (2013). Promoting Student Creativity and Inventiveness in Science and Engineering. In: Carayannis, E.G. (eds) Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_395
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_395
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-3857-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-3858-8
eBook Packages: Business and Economics