Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship

2013 Edition
| Editors: Elias G. Carayannis

Psychology of Creativity

  • Liane Gabora
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_386

Synonyms

Key Concepts and Definition of Terms

Defining Creativity

Creativity is arguably our most uniquely human trait. It enables us to escape the present, reconstruct the past, and fantasize about the future, to envision something that does not exist and change the world with it. The elusiveness of the construct of creativity makes it that much more important to obtain a satisfactory definition of it. Defining creativity presents difficulties; for example, not all creative works are useful, and not all are aesthetically pleasing, though both usefulness and aesthetic value capture, in some sense, what creativity is about. Nevertheless, psychologists have almost universally converged on the definition originally proposed by Guilford over 60 years ago. Guilford (1950) defined creativity in terms of two criteria: originality or novelty, and appropriatenessor adaptiveness, i.e.,...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Amabile T. Creativity in context. Boulder: Westview Press; 1996.Google Scholar
  2. Baer J. Is creativity domain specific? In: Kaufman J, Sternberg R, editors. Cambridge handbook of creativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2010. p. 321–41.Google Scholar
  3. Beghetto RA, Kaufman JC. Toward a broader conception of creativity: a case for “mini-c” creativity. Psychol Aesthetic Creativity Arts. 2007;1(2):73–9.Google Scholar
  4. Boden MA. The philosophy of artificial intelligence. New York: Oxford University Press; 1990.Google Scholar
  5. Cropley D, Cropley JK, Runco M, editors. The dark side of creativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2010.Google Scholar
  6. Feldman DH, Csikszentmihalyi M, Gardner H. Changing the world: a framework for the study of creativity. Westport: Praeger; 1994.Google Scholar
  7. Finke RA, Ward TB, Smith SM. Creative cognition: theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1992.Google Scholar
  8. Gabora L. Revenge of the “neurds”: characterizing creative thought in terms of the structure and dynamics of human memory. Creativity Res J. 2010;22(1):1–13.Google Scholar
  9. Guilford JP. Creativity. Am Psychol. 1950;5:444–54.Google Scholar
  10. Hayes JR. Cognitive processes in creativity. In: Glover JA, Ronning RR, Reynolds CR, editors. Handbook of creativity. New York: Plenum Press; 1989. p. 135–45.Google Scholar
  11. Kaufman JC, Sternberg RJ. Resource review: creativity. Change. 2007;39:55–8.Google Scholar
  12. Leijnen S, Gabora L. How creative should creators be to optimize the evolution of ideas? A computational model. Elect Proc Theor Comp Sci. 2009;9:108–19.Google Scholar
  13. Plucker JA. Beware of simple conclusions: the case for the content generality of creativity. Creativity Res J. 1998;11:179–82.Google Scholar
  14. Runco MA. Creativity. Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:657–87.Google Scholar
  15. Simonton DK. Creativity as blind variation and selective retention: is the creative process Darwinian? Psychol Inq. 1999;10:309–28.Google Scholar
  16. Sternberg RJ. A three-faceted model of creativity. In: Sternberg RJ, editor. The nature of creativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1988. p. 125–47.Google Scholar
  17. Torrance EP. The Torrance tests of creative thinking. Princeton: Personnel Press; 1996.Google Scholar
  18. Torrance EP. Torrance tests of creative thinking-norms and technical manual. Lexington, Massachusetts: Ginn, 1974.Google Scholar
  19. Wallas G. The art of thought. London: Cape; 1926.Google Scholar
  20. Weisberg RW. Creativity. New York: Wiley; 2006.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of British Columbia Okanagan CampusKelownaCanada