Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship

2013 Edition
| Editors: Elias G. Carayannis

Partnerships and Entrepreneurship (Vol Entrepreneurship)

  • Delphine Gallaud
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_236

Synonyms

Introduction

Scholars have considered entrepreneurship only as a creation by an independent entrepreneur for a long time. However public policies reconsidered this view in the 1980s and encouraged the development of two new kinds of entrepreneurships: first, academic entrepreneurship during the 1990s, and second, corporate entrepreneurship (CE) in the following decade (Phan et al. 2009). At the end of the 1990s, public policies tried to improve the system of innovation and to speed up the conversion of fundamental research into commercial innovation. So, it encouraged the development of academic entrepreneurship (Nicolaou and Birley 2003). Academic entrepreneurship is a real breakdown with the traditional culture of university that focuses on the production of knowledge, and not on commercial purposes. Corporate entrepreneurship includes various kinds of organizational practices that allow the firm to develop new...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Chesbrough H. Open innovation the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 2003. 231.Google Scholar
  2. Colombo M, Grilli L, Piva E. In search of complementary assets: the determinants of alliance formation of high tech start-ups. Res Policy. 2006;35:1166–99.Google Scholar
  3. Hoang H, Antoncic B. Network-based research in entrepreneurship: a critical review. J Bus Ventur. 2003;18:165–87.Google Scholar
  4. Imai H, Itami K. Interpenetration of organization and markets: Japan firms and markets in comparison with the US. Int J Ind Org. 1984;2:285–310.Google Scholar
  5. MESR. Recherche et développement, innovation et partenariats. 2009. 90 p. http:www.media.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/…/SETTAR_2009_159899.pdf. Accessed June 2011.Google Scholar
  6. Narayanan VK, Yang Y, Zahra X. Corporate venturing and value creation: a review and proposed framework. Res Policy. 2009;38(1):58–76.Google Scholar
  7. Nicolaou N, Birley S. Academic networks in a trichotomous categorization of university spin-outs. J Bus Ventur. 2003;18:333–59.Google Scholar
  8. Parkhangras A, Arenius P. From a corporate venture to an independent company a base for a taxonomy for corporate spin offs firms. Res Policy. 2003;32(3):463–81.Google Scholar
  9. Perez M, Martinez Sanchez A. The development of university spin offs: early dynamics of technology transfer and networking. Technovation. 2003;23:823–31.Google Scholar
  10. Phan P, Wright M, Ucbazarn D, Tan WL. Corporate entrepreneurship: current research and further direction. J Bus Ventur. 2009;24(3):197–205.Google Scholar
  11. Schutjens V, Stam E. The evolution and nature of young firm’s networks: a longitudinal perspective. Small Bus Econ. 2003;21:115–34.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.INRA CESAER (UMR 1041)Unité Mixte de Recherche INRA-AgrosupDijon CedexFrance