Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship

2013 Edition
| Editors: Elias G. Carayannis

Business Cycles

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_195

Synonyms

Introduction

The first rigorous attempt to link the innovation role of the “pioneering entrepreneur” with the boom and bust of business cycles was by Joseph Schumpeter in his two-volume Business Cycles (Schumpeter 1939). This linkage is fraught with danger as it attempts to examine innovative entrepreneurship – which occurs at the individual firm level – with the aggregate pattern on economic cycles at an economy-wide level. Much has been researched and written since then in an effort to overcome the pitfalls of this dilemma, while preserving the dynamic power of an endogenous entrepreneurial-driven cyclical process. This entry will examine the various mechanisms that have been proposed on how the action of innovative entrepreneurs can lead to prosperity and recession. The analysis begins with a first “simple” approximation of the dynamics of entrepreneurs and cycles, and builds dynamic complexity with further...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

References

  1. Becker M, Knudsen T. The entrepreneur at a crucial juncture in Schumpeter’s work: Schumpeter’s 1928 handbook entry Entrepreneur. In: Koppl R, editor. Austrian economics and entrepreneurial studies: advances in Austrian economics, vol. 6. Oxford: Elsevier Science; 2003. p. 199–233.Google Scholar
  2. Courvisanos J. Cycles, crises and innovation: path to sustainable development – a Kaleckian-Schumpeterian synthesis. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar; 2012.Google Scholar
  3. Courvisanos J. Investment cycles in capitalist economies: a Kaleckian behavioral contribution. Cheltenham/Brookfield: Edward Elgar; 1996.Google Scholar
  4. Courvisanos J, Verspagen B. Innovation and investment in capitalist economies 1870–2000: Kaleckian dynamics and evolutionary life cycles. Invest Econ. 2002;LXII(242):33–80.Google Scholar
  5. Kalecki M. Theory of economic dynamics. In: Osiatyński J, editor. Collected works of Michał Kalecki, volume II capitalism: economic dynamics. Oxford: Clarendon; [1954] 1991. p. 205–348 [Original book published 1954, London: George Allen and Unwin].Google Scholar
  6. Kalecki M. Trend and business cycle. In Osiatyński J, editor. Collected works of Michał Kalecki, volume II capitalism: economic dynamics (pp. 435–50). Oxford: Clarendon Press [Original published 1968 as Trend and business cycle reconsidered. Econ J. ([1968] 1991); 78(2): 263–76].Google Scholar
  7. Rothbarth E. Review of business cycles. In Schumpeter JA, editor. Econ J. (1942); 52(206/207): 223–29.Google Scholar
  8. Schohl F. A Schumpeterian heterogeneous agent model of the business cycle. Quarter J Aus Econ. 1999;2(1):1–20.Google Scholar
  9. Schumpeter J. Business cycles: a theoretical, historical and statistical analysis of the capitalist process, vol. 2. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1939.Google Scholar
  10. Shackle G. Epistemics and economics: a critique of economic doctrines. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1972.Google Scholar
  11. White G. Rethinking Kalecki on the trend and cycle. Rev Polit Econ. 1999;11(3):341–53.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Business SchoolUniversity of BallaratBallaratAustralia