Encyclopedia of Planetary Landforms

2015 Edition
| Editors: Henrik Hargitai, Ákos Kereszturi

Current Crescent and Scour Flute

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3134-3_116

Definition, Description, and Subtypes

  1. (1)

    Erosional: Scour zone/crescentic furrow – a deposit-free U-shaped or moat-like depression encircling a topographic obstacle in an area otherwise covered by deposits (e.g., aeolian) (Bishop 2011). The deepest part of the moat is typically upwind (e.g., between a possible echo dune and the obstacle). Its arms extend leeward in a pair of furrows that become shallower and wider downflow (Sharpe and Shaw 1989) (Figs. 1 and 3a–c).

     
  2. (2)

    Depositional: Horseshoe (U) shaped or paired accumulations in front of an obstacle (on the windward or up-current side) and on the two sides appearing as two wings, formed by the airflow or streamflow deflected around and over the obstacle (Pye and Tsoar 1990 and references therein) (double  lee dunes) (Fig. 3d).

     
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Allen JRL (1965) Scour marks in snow. J Sediment Petrol 35(2):331–338Google Scholar
  2. Allen JRL (1982) Sedimentary structures: their character and physical basis II. In: Developments in sedimentology 30b. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  3. Bishop MA (2010) Obstacle marks: evidence of variable wind erosion and sediment transport, Hellespontus, Mars. In: Second international planetary dunes workshop #2020 LPIGoogle Scholar
  4. Bishop MA (2011) Aeolian scours as putative signatures of wind erosion and sediment transport direction on Mars. Geophys J Roy Astron Soc 125:569–574Google Scholar
  5. Euler T (2009) Fluvial obstacle marks as complex geomorphic systems: a comparison between physically modelled and natural forms. Geophys Res Abstr 11, EGU2009-4035, EGU General AssemblyGoogle Scholar
  6. Greeley R (1999) Mars pathfinder landing site: simulations of wind erosion and deposition. Lunar Planet Sci Conf XXX, abstract #1300, HoustonGoogle Scholar
  7. Greeley R, Bridges NT, Kuzmin RO, Laity JE (2002) Terrestrial analogs to wind-related features at the Viking and pathfinder landing sites on Mars. J Geophys Res 107:E1. doi:10.1029/2000JE001481Google Scholar
  8. Herget J (2005) Reconstruction of Pleistocene ice-dammed lake outburst floods in the Altai Mountains, Siberia. The Geological Society of America Special Paper 386Google Scholar
  9. Karcz I (1968) Fluviatile obstacle marks from the wadis of the Negev (Southern Israel). J Sediment Petrol 38(4):1000–1012Google Scholar
  10. Komar PD (1985) Experiments and analyses of the formation of erosional scour marks with implications to the origin of the Martian outflow channels. NASA, Washington Reports of Planetary Geol Geophys Program, 22–324 (SEE N85-23474 13-91)Google Scholar
  11. Kor PSG, Shaw J, Sharpe DR (1991) Erosion of bedrock by subglacial meltwater, Georgian Bay, Ontario: a regional view. Can J Earth Sci 28:623–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mandt K, de Silva S, Zimbelman J, Wyrick D (2009) Distinct erosional progressions in the Medusae Fossae Formation, Mars, indicate contrasting environmental conditions. Icarus 204:471–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Metzger SM (2000) Shifting wind regimes at MPF as evidenced by wind tail bedding. Lunar Planet Sci Conf XXXI, abstract #2095, HoustonGoogle Scholar
  14. Munro-Stasiuk MJ, Shaw J, Sjogren DB, Brennand TA, Fisher TG, Sharpe DR, Kor PSG, Beaney CL, Rains BB (2009) The morphology and sedimentology of landforms created by subglacial megafloods. In: Carling PA, Baker VR, Burr DM (eds) Megaflooding on earth and mars. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 78–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Peabody FE (1947) Current crescents in the Triassic Moenkopi formation [Arizona]. J Sediment Res 17(2):73–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pye K, Tsoar H (1990) Aeolian sand and sand dunes. Unwin Hyman, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Reineck HE, Singh IB (1973) Depositional sedimentary environments. Springer, Berlin, 439 ppCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rygel MC, Calder JH, Gibling MR, Gingras MK, Melrose CSA (2006) Tournaisian forested wetlands in the Horton Group of Atlantic Canada. GSA Spec Pap 399:103–126. doi:10.1130/2006.2399(05)Google Scholar
  19. Sharpe DR, Shaw J (1989) Erosion of bedrock by subglacial meltwater, Cantley, Quebec. Geol Soc Am Bull 101:1011–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shaw J, Pugin A, Young RR (2008) A meltwater origin for Antarctic shelf bedforms with special attention to megalineations. Geomorphology 102(3–4):364–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tsoar H (1983) Wind tunnel modeling of echo and climbing dunes. In: Brookfield ME, Ahlbrandt TS (eds) Eolian sediments and processes. Developments in sedimentology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 247–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Werner F, Unsöld G, Koopmann B, Stefanon A (1980) Field observations and flume experiments on the nature of comet marks. Sediment Geol 26:233–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.NASA Ames Research Center/NPPMoffett FieldUSA