Security Cooperation in Space and International Relations Theory

Reference work entry

Abstract

This chapter resorts to international relations theory to explain various patterns of security cooperation in space. There have been several attempts for security cooperation but the success was limited. While neorealism explains this lack of cooperation with the difficulties to achieve balanced gains, for neoinstitutionalism, the central hurdle is the establishment of effective rules and mechanisms to verify the compliance of states. For a constructivist/liberal account, the main problem lies in the dominant beliefs about the value of unilateral space policies. Taken together these three theoretical perspectives provide a comprehensive account of security cooperation in space.

Keywords

Europe Transportation Radar Explosive Defend 

References

  1. Adler E (1997) Seizing the middle ground. Constructivism in World Politics. IN: European Journal of International Relations 3(3): 319–63Google Scholar
  2. Baseley-Walker B, Weeden B (2010) Verification in space. Theories, realities and possibilities. Disarm Forum 11:39–50Google Scholar
  3. Black S (2008) No harmful interference with space objects. The key to confidence-building. Stimson Center Report 69. The Henry L. Stimson Center, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  4. Commission to Assess United States National Security Space Management and Organization (2001) Report of the Commission to Assess United States National Security Space Management and Organization. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  5. Conference on Disarmament (2008a) Treaty on prevention of the placement of weapons in outer space and of the threat or use of force against outer space objects. Issued to the Conference on Disarmament by the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China. CD/1839, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  6. Conference on Disarmament (2008b) Analysis of a draft “Treaty on prevention of the placement of weapons in outer space, or the threat or use of force against outer space objects”. Paper issued by the United State of America to the Conference on Disarmament. CD/1847, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  7. Conference on Disarmament (2009) On the merits of certain draft transparency and confidence-building measures and treaty proposals for space security. Working paper issued to the Conference on Disarmament by Canada. CD/1865, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  8. Council of the European Union (2008) Draft code of conduct for outer space activities. 17175/08, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  9. Dickow M (2009) The European Union proposal for a code of conduct for outer space activities. In: Schrogl K-U, Mathieu C, Peter N (eds) Yearbook on space policy 2007/2008. From policies to programmes. Springer, Vienna, pp 152–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Finnemore M, Sikkink K (1998) International norm dynamics and political change. Int Organ 52:887–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goldstein J, Keohane RO (eds) (1993) Ideas and foreign policy. Beliefs, institutions, and political change. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  12. Grego L, Wright D (2010) Securing the skies. Ten steps the United States should take to improve the security and sustainability of space. Union of Concerned Scientists, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Grieco JM (1988) Anarchy and the limits of cooperation. A realist critique of the newest liberal institutionalism. Int Organ 42:485–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grieco JM (1990) Cooperation among nations. Europe, America, and non-tariff barriers to trade. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  15. Haas PM (1997) Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination. In: Haas PM (ed) Knowledge, power, and international policy coordination. University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, pp 1–35Google Scholar
  16. Hagen R, Scheffran J (2003) Is a space weapon ban feasible? Thoughts on technology and verification of arms control in space. Disarm Forum 4:41–51Google Scholar
  17. Hansel M (2010) The USA and arms control in space. An IR analysis. Space Policy 26:91–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hasenclever A, Mayer P, Rittberger V (2002) Theories of international regimes. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson R (2006) Changing perceptions and practice in multilateral arms control negotiations. In: Borrie J, Radin VM (eds) Thinking outside the box in multilateral disarmament and arms control negotiations. United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, Geneva, pp 55–87Google Scholar
  20. Keohane RO (1984) After hegemony. Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  21. Keohane RO (1989) Neoliberal institutionalism. A perspective on world politics. In: Keohane RO (ed) International institutions and state power. Essays in international relations theory. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 1–20Google Scholar
  22. Moltz JC (2011) The politics of space security. Strategic restraint and the pursuit of national interests, 2nd edn. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  23. Moravcsik A (1997) Taking preferences seriously. A liberal theory of international politics. Int Organ 51:513–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moravcsik A (1998) The choice for Europe. Social purpose and state power from Messina to Maastricht. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  25. Mowthorpe M (2004) The militarization and weaponization of space. Lexington Books, LanhamGoogle Scholar
  26. Müller H (2002) Security cooperation. In: Carlsnaes W, Risse T, Simmons BA (eds) Handbook of international relations. Sage, London, pp 369–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mutschler MM (2010) Keeping space safe. Towards a long-term strategy to arms control in space. PRIF-Report 98. Peace Research Institute Frankfurt (PRIF), FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
  28. Mutschler MM (2013) Arms control in space. Exploring conditions for preventive arms control. Palgrave Macmillan, BasingstokeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mutschler MM, Venet C (2012) The European Union as an emerging actor in space security? Space Policy 27:118–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Neuneck G (2008) Ist die Bewaffnung des Weltraums unvermeidbar? Möglichkeiten und Aussichten für eine präventive Rüstungskontrolle im Weltraum. Die Friedens-Warte 83:127–153Google Scholar
  31. Nye JS (1987) Nuclear learning and U.S. – Soviet security regimes. Int Organ 41:371–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rathgeber W, Remuss N-L, Schrogl K-U (2009) Space security and the European code of conduct for outer space activities. Disarm Forum 10:33–42Google Scholar
  33. Risse-Kappen T (1994) Ideas do not float freely. Transnational coalitions, domestic structures, and the end of the cold war. Int Organ 48:185–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schrogl K-U (2005) Weltraumrecht und Sicherheitspolitik. In: Borchert H (ed) Europas Zukunft zwischen Himmel und Erde. Weltraumpolitik für Sicherheit, Stabilität und Prosperität. Nomos, Baden-Baden, pp 68–82Google Scholar
  35. Sheehan M (2007) The international politics of space. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stares PB (1985) The militarization of space. U.S. policy, 1945–1984. Columbia University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  37. The Henry L. Stimson Center (2004) Model code of conduct for the prevention of incidents and dangerous military practices in outer space. http://www.stimson.org/wos/pdf/codeofconduct.pdf. Accessed 11 Nov 2009
  38. The Henry L. Stimson Center (2007) Model code of conduct for responsible space-faring nations. http://www.stimson.org/pub.cfm?ID=575. Accessed 23 April 2010
  39. Waltz KN (1959) Man, the state and war. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Waltz KN (1979) Theory of international politics. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. Webb D (2009) Space weapons. Dream, nightmare or reality? In: Bormann N, Sheehan M (eds) Securing outer space. Routledge, London, pp 24–41Google Scholar
  42. Weber S, Drell SD (1988) Attempts to regulate military activities in space. In: George AL, Farley PJ, Dallin A (eds) US-Soviet security cooperation. Achievements, failures, lessons. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 373–431Google Scholar
  43. Wertheimer J (1987) The anti-satellite negotiations. In: Carnesale A, Haass R (eds) Superpower arms control. Setting the record straight. Ballinger, Cambridge, pp 139–163Google Scholar
  44. White House (2006) U.S. national space policy. http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/nspd/space.pdf. Accessed 26 Dec 2012
  45. Wolter D (2006) Common security in outer space and international law. United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, GenevaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.German Institute for International and Security AffairsBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations