Skip to main content

Taste

  • Reference work entry

Abstract

Rozin coined the phrase “the omnivore’s dilemma” to encapsulate what an omnivore must do to survive: avoid toxins and take in nutritious food. This chapter is organized to show what is known about how taste contributes to this biological imperative. We begin with the anatomy and physiology of taste and show how nature uses chemosensory pleasure (liking for beneficial substances and disliking for dangerous ones) to promote survival. One of the most important distinctions for this area is between hard-wired and learned affect. Historically, belief in hard-wired affect has often given way to understanding how learning accomplished what seemed to be hard-wired.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   1,699.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Further Reading

  • Bartoshuk LM (1993) The biological basis of food perception and acceptance. Food Qual Prefer 4:21–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartoshuk LM, Duffy VB, Fast K, Green BG, Prutkin JM, Snyder DJ (2002) Labeled scales (e.g., category, Likert, VAS) and invalid across-group comparisons. What we have learned from genetic variation in taste. Food Qual Prefer 14:125–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartoshuk LM, Snyder DJ, Grushka M, Berger AM, Duffy VB, Kveton JF (2005) Taste damage: previously unsuspected consequences. Chem Senses 30(Suppl 1):i218–i219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp GK (2009) Sensory and receptor responses to umami: an overview of pioneering work. Am J Clin Nutr 90(suppl):723S–727S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Behrens M, Meyerhof W (2010) Oral and extraoral bitter taste receptors. Sens Metabol Control Energy Balance 52:87–99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhari N, Roper SD (2010) The cell biology of taste. J Cell Biol 190:285–296

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DeSimone JA, Lyall V, Heck GL, Feldman GM (2001) Acid detection by taste receptor cells. Respir Physiol 129:231–245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doty RL (2010) The great pheromone myth. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy VB, Lanier SA, Hutchins HL, Pescatello LS, Johnson MK, Bartoshuk LM (2007) Food preference as a screen for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk within health risk appraisal. J Am Diet Assoc 107:237–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goff SA, Klee HJ (2006) Plant volatile compounds: sensory cues for health and nutritional value? Science 311:815–819

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meyerhof W, Batram C, Kuhn C, Brockhoff A, Chudoba E, Bufe B, Appendino G, Behrens M (2010) The molecular receptive ranges of human TAS2R bitter taste receptors. Chem Senses 35:157–170

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ming D, Ninomiya Y, Margolskee RF (1999) Blocking taste receptor activation of gustducin inhibits gustatory responses to bitter compounds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:9903–9908

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pfaffmann C (1960) The pleasures of sensation. Psychol Rev 67:253–268

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prutkin JM, Duffy VB, Etter L, Fast K, Gardner E, Lucchina LA, Fisher EM, Snyder DJ, Tie K, Weiffenbach J, Bartoshuk LM (2000) Genetic variation and inferences about perceived taste intensity in mice and men. Physiol Behav 69:161–173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rolls BJ (1986) Sensory-specific satiety. Nutr Rev 44:93–101

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstein D, Oster H (1988) Differential facial responses to four basic tastes in newborns. Child Dev 59:1555–1568

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rozin P (1976) The selection of foods by rats, humans, and other animals. In: Rosenblatt JS, Hinde RA, Shaw E, Beer C (eds) Advances in the study of behavior, vol 6. Academic, New York, pp 21–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Sclafani A (2001) Psychobiology of food preferences. Int J Obes 25(Suppl):S13–S16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd GM (2005) Outline of a theory of olfactory processing and its relevance to humans. Chem Senses 30(Suppl 1):i3–i5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder DJ, Bartoshuk LM (2008) The logic of sensory and hedonic comparisons: are the obese different? In: Blass EM (ed) Obesity: causes, mehanisms, prevention and treatment. Sinauer, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder DJ, Fast K, Bartoshuk LM (2004) Valid comparisons of suprathreshold stimuli. J Conscious Stud 11:40–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Swithers SE, Martin AA, Davidson TL (2010) High-intensity sweeteners and energy balance. Physiol Behav 100(1):55–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Temussi PA (2009) Sweet, bitter and umami receptors: a complex relationship. Trends Biochem Sci 34(6):296–302

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead M, Kachele D (1994) Development of fungiform papillae, taste buds, and their innervation in the hamster. J Comp Neurol 340:515–530

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda M. Bartoshuk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Bartoshuk, L.M., Snyder, D.J. (2013). Taste. In: Pfaff, D.W. (eds) Neuroscience in the 21st Century. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1997-6_28

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics