Skip to main content

Hamilton–Jacobi Equations and Weak KAM Theory

  • Reference work entry
Mathematics of Complexity and Dynamical Systems

Article Outline

Glossary

Definition of the Subject

Introduction

Subsolutions

Solutions

First Regularity Results for Subsolutions

Critical Equation and Aubry Set

An Intrinsic Metric

Dynamical Properties of the Aubry Set

Long-Time Behavior of Solutions to the Time-Dependent Equation

Main Regularity Result

Future Directions

Bibliography

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 600.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

Hamilton–Jacobi equations:

This class of first-order partial differential equations has a central relevance in several branches of mathematics, both from a theoretical and an application point of view. It is of primary importance in classical mechanics, Hamiltonian dynamics, Riemannian and Finsler geometry, and optimal control theory, as well. It furthermore appears in the classical limit of the Schrödinger equation. A connection with Hamilton's equations, in the case where the Hamiltonian has sufficient regularity, is provided by the classical Hamilton–Jacobi method which shows that the graph of the differential of any regular, say C 1, global solution to the equation is an invariant subset for the corresponding Hamiltonian flow. The drawback of this approach is that such regular solutions do not exist in general, even for very regular Hamiltonians. See the next paragraph for more comments on this issue.

Viscosity solutions:

As already pointed out, Hamilton–Jacobi equations do not have in general global classical solutions, i. e. everywhere differentiable functions satisfying the equation pointwise. The method of characteristics just yields local classical solutions. This explains the need of introducing weak solutions. The idea for defining those of viscosity type is to consider C 1 functions whose graph, up to an additive constant, touches that of the candidate solution at a point and then stay locally above (resp. below) it. These are the viscosity test functions, and it is required that the Hamiltonian satisfies suitable inequalities when its first-order argument is set equal to the differential of them at the first coordinate of the point of contact. Similarly it is defined the notion of viscosity sub, supersolution. Clearly a viscosity solution satisfies pointwise the equation at any differentiability points. A peculiarity of the definition is that a viscosity solution can admit no test function at some point, while the nonemptiness of both classes of test functions is equivalent to the solution being differentiable at the point. Nevertheless powerful existence, uniqueness and stability results hold in the framework of viscosity solution theory. The notion of viscosity solutions was introduced by Crandall and Lions at the beginning of the 1980s. We refer to Bardi and Capuzzo Dolcetta [2], Barles [3], Koike [24] for a comprehensive treatment of this topic.

Semiconcave and semiconvex functions:

These are the appropriate regularity notions when working with viscosity solution techniques. The definition is given by requiring some inequalities, involving convex combinations of points, to hold. These functions possess viscosity test functions of one of the two types at any point. When the Hamiltonian enjoys coercivity properties ensuring that any viscosity solution is locally Lipschitz-continuous then a semiconcave or semiconcave function is the solution if and only if it is classical solution almost everywhere, i. e. up to a set of zero Lebesgue measure.

Metric approach:

This method applies to stationary Hamilton–Jacobi equations with the Hamiltonian only depending on the state and momentum variable. This consists of defining a length functional, on the set of Lipschitz-continuous curves, related to the corresponding sublevels of the Hamiltonian. The associated length distance, obtained by performing the infimum of the intrinsic length of curves joining two given points, plays a crucial role in the analysis of the equation and, in particular, enters in representation formulae for any viscosity solution. One important consequence is that only the sublevels of the Hamiltonian matter for determining such solutions. Accordingly the convexity condition on the Hamiltonian can be relaxed, just requiring quasiconvexity, i. e. convexity of sublevels. Note that in this case the metric is of Finsler type and the sublevels are the unit cotangent balls of it.

Critical equations:

To any Hamiltonian is associated a one-parameter family of Hamilton–Jacobi equations obtained by fixing a constant level of Hamiltonian. When studying such a family, one comes across a threshold value under which no subsolutions may exist. This is called the critical value and the same name is conferred to the corresponding equation. If the ground space is compact then the critical equation is unique among those of the family for which viscosity solutions do exist. When, in particular, the underlying space is a torus or, in other terms, the Hamiltonian is \({{\mathbb Z}^N}\)-periodic then such functions play the role of correctors in related homogenization problems.

Aubry set:

The analysis of the critical equation shows that the obstruction for getting subsolutions at subcritical levels is concentrated on a special set of the ground space, in the sense that no critical subsolution can be strict around it. This is precisely the Aubry set. This is somehow compensated by the fact that critical subsolutions enjoy extra regularity properties on the Aubry set.

Bibliography

  1. Arnold WI, Kozlov WW, Neishtadt AI (1988) Mathematical aspects of classical and celestial mechanics. In: Encyclopedia of Mathematical Sciences: Dynamical Systems III. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bardi M, Capuzzo Dolcetta I (1997) Optimal Control and Viscosity Solutions of Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equations. Birkhäuser, Boston

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Barles G (1994) Solutions de viscosité des équations de Hamilton–Jacobi. Springer, Paris

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Barles G, Souganidis PE (2000) On the large time behavior of solutions of Hamilton–Jacobi equations. SIAM J Math Anal 31:925–939

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Bernard P (2007) Smooth critical subsolutions of the Hamilton–Jacobi equation. Math Res Lett 14:503–511

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Bernard P, Buffoni B (2007) Optimal mass transportation and Mather theory. J Eur Math Soc 9:85–121

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Buttazzo G, Giaquinta M, Hildebrandt S (1998) One‐dimensional Variational Problems. In: Oxford Lecture Series in Mathematics and its Applications, 15. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  8. Clarke F (1983) Optimization and nonsmooth analysis. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Contreras G, Iturriaga R (1999) Global Minimizers of Autonomous Lagrangians. In: 22nd Brazilian Mathematics Colloquium, IMPA, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  10. Davini A, Siconolfi A (2006) A generalized dynamical approach to the large time behavior of solutions of Hamilton–Jacobi equations. SIAM J Math Anal 38:478–502

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Davini A, Siconolfi A (2007) Exact and approximate correctors for stochastic Hamiltonians: the 1-dimensional case. to appear in Mathematische Annalen

    Google Scholar 

  12. Davini A, Siconolfi A (2007) Hamilton–Jacobi equations in the stationary ergodic setting: existence of correctors and Aubry set. (preprint)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Evans LC (2004) A survey of partial differential methods in weak KAM theory. Commun Pure Appl Math 57

    Google Scholar 

  14. Evans LC, Gomes D (2001) Effective Hamiltonians and averaging for Hamilton dynamics I. Arch Ration Mech Anal 157:1–33

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Evans LC, Gomes D (2002) Effective Hamiltonians and averaging for Hamilton dynamics II. Arch Rattion Mech Anal 161:271–305

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Fathi A (1997) Solutions KAM faibles et barrières de Peierls. C R Acad Sci Paris 325:649–652

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Fathi A (1998) Sur la convergence du semi–groupe de Lax–Oleinik. C R Acad Sci Paris 327:267–270

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Fathi A () Weak Kam Theorem in Lagrangian Dynamics. Cambridge University Press (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fathi A, Siconolfi A (2004) Existence of C 1 critical subsolutions of the Hamilton–Jacobi equations. Invent Math 155:363–388

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Fathi A, Siconolfi A (2005) PDE aspects of Aubry–Mather theory for quasiconvex Hamiltonians. Calc Var 22:185–228

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Forni G, Mather J (1994) Action minimizing orbits in Hamiltonian systems. In: Graffi S (ed) Transition to Chaos in Classical and Quantum Mechanics. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol 1589. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ishii H (2006) Asymptotic solutions for large time Hamilton–Jacobi equations. In: International Congress of Mathematicians, vol III. Eur Math Soc, Zürich, pp 213–227

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ishii H () Asymptotic solutions of Hamilton–Jacobi equations in Euclidean n space. Anal Non Linéaire, Ann Inst H Poincaré (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Koike S (2004) A beginner's guide to the theory of viscosity solutions. In: MSJ Memoirs, vol 13. Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lions PL (1987) Papanicolaou G, Varadhan SRS, Homogenization of Hamilton–Jacobi equations. Unpublished preprint

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lions PL, Souganidis T (2003) Correctors for the homogenization of Hamilton‐Jacobi equations in the stationary ergodic setting. Commun Pure Appl Math 56:1501–1524

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Roquejoffre JM (2001) Convergence to Steady States of Periodic Solutions in a Class of Hamilton–Jacobi Equations. J Math Pures Appl 80:85–104

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Roquejoffre JM (2006) Propriétés qualitatives des solutions des équations de Hamilton–Jacobi et applications. Séminaire Bourbaki 975, 59ème anné. Société Mathématique de France, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  29. Siconolfi A (2006) Variational aspects of Hamilton–Jacobi equations and dynamical systems. In: Encyclopedia of Mathematical Physics. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  30. Villani C () Optimal transport, old and new. http://www.umpa.ens-lyon.fr/cvillani/. Accessed 28 Aug 2008

  31. Weinan E (1999) Aubry–Mather theory and periodic solutions of the forced Burgers equation. Commun Pure and Appl Math 52:811–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag

About this entry

Cite this entry

Siconolfi, A. (2012). Hamilton–Jacobi Equations and Weak KAM Theory . In: Meyers, R. (eds) Mathematics of Complexity and Dynamical Systems. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1806-1_42

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics