Encyclopedia of Systems and Control

Living Edition
| Editors: John Baillieul, Tariq Samad

Polynomial/Algebraic Design Methods

  • Vladimı́r Kučera
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5102-9_239-1

Abstract

Polynomial techniques have made important contributions to systems and control theory. Algebraic formalism offers several useful tools for control system design. In most cases, control systems are designed to be stable and to meet additional performance specifications, such as optimality or robustness. The basic tool is a parameterization of all controllers that stabilize a given plant. Optimal or robust controllers are then obtained by an appropriate selection of the parameter. An alternative tool is a reduction of controller synthesis to a solution of a polynomial equation of specific type. These two polynomial/algebraic approaches will be presented as closely related rather than isolated alternatives.

Keywords

Linear systems Controller synthesis Youla-Kučera parameterization of stabilizing controllers Polynomial equation approach to control system design 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Anderson BDO (1998) From Youla-Kučera to identification, adaptive and nonlinear control. Automatica 34:1485–1506CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Åström KJ (1970) Introduction to stochastic control theory. Academic, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Desoer CA, Liu RW, Murray J, Saeks R (1980) Feedback system design: the fractional representation approach to analysis and synthesis. IEEE Trans Autom Control 25:399–412CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. Doyle JC, Francis BA, Tannenbaum AR (1992) Feedback control theory. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Hammer J (1985) Nonlinear system stabilization and coprimeness. Int J Control 44:1349–1381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Henrion D, Tarbouriech S, Kučera V (2001) Control of linear systems subject to input constraints: a polynomial aproach. Automatica 37:597–604CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Henrion D, Šebek M, Kučera V (2003) Positive polynomials and robust stabilization with fixed-order controllers. IEEE Trans Autom Control 48:1178–1186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Henrion D, Tarbouriech S, Kučera V (2005a) Control of linear systems subject to time-domain constraints with polynomial pole placement and LMIs. IEEE Trans Autom Control 50:1360–1364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Henrion D, Kučera V, Molina-Cristobal A (2005b) Optimizing simultaneously over the numerator and denominator polynomials in the Youla-Kučera parametrization. IEEE Trans Autom Control 50:1369–1374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jury EI (1958) Sampled-data control systems. Wiley, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Kučera V (1974) Closed-loop stability of discrete linear single variable systems. Kybernetika 10:146–171MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. Kučera V (1975) Stability of discrete linear feedback systems. In: Proceedings of the 6th IFAC world congress, Boston, vol 1, pp 44.1Google Scholar
  13. Kučera V (1979) Discrete linear control: the polynomial equation approach. Wiley, ChichesterMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Kučera V (1993) Diophantine equations in control – a survey. Automatica 29:1361–1375CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Kučera V (2007) Polynomial control: past, present, and future. Int J Robust Nonlinear 17:682–705CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Kučera V (2003) Parametrization of stabilizing controllers with applications. In: Voicu M (ed) Advances in automatic control. Kluwer, Boston, pp 173–192Google Scholar
  17. Kučera V (2011) Algebraic design methods. In: Levine WS (ed) The control handbook: control system advanced methods, 2nd edn. CRC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  18. Larin VB, Naumenko KI, Suntsev VN (1971) Spectral methods for synthesis of linear systems with feedback (in Russian). Naukova Dumka, KievGoogle Scholar
  19. Nett CN, Jacobson CA, Balas MJ (1984) A connection between state-space and doubly coprime fractional representations. IEEE Trans Automat Control 29:831–832CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. Newton G, Gould L, Kaiser JF (1957) Analytic design of linear feedback controls. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Paice ADB, Moore JB (1990) On the Youla-Kučera parametrization of nonlinear systems. Syst Control Lett 14:121–129CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. Quadrat A (2003) On a generalization of the Youla-Kučera parametrization. Part I: the fractional ideal approach to SISO systems. Syst Control Lett 50:135–148CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. Quadrat A (2006) On a generalization of the Youla-Kučera parametrization. Part II: the lattice approach to MIMO systems. Math Control Signal 18:199–235CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. Vidyasagar M (1985) Control system synthesis: a factorization approach. MIT, CambridgeMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. Volgin LN (1962) The fundamentals of the theory of controlling machines (in Russian). Soviet Radio, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  26. Youla DC, Bongiorno JJ, Jabr HA (1976a) Modern Wiener-Hopf design of optimal controllers, part I: the single-input case. IEEE Trans Autom Control 21:3–14CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  27. Youla DC, Jabr HA, Bongiorno JJ (1976b) Modern Wiener-Hopf design of optimal controllers, part II: the multivariable case. IEEE Trans Autom Control 21:319–338CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vladimı́r Kučera
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University of PraguePragueCzech Republic