Encyclopedia of Systems and Control

2015 Edition
| Editors: John Baillieul, Tariq Samad

Vehicle Dynamics Control

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5058-9_71

Abstract

Current prevailing control technology enables vehicle dynamic control through powertrain torque manipulation and individual wheel braking. Longitudinal control can maintain vehicle acceleration/braking capability within the physical limits that the road condition can support, while vehicle lateral control can preserve vehicle steering/handling capability up to the maximum capacity offered by the road/tire interaction. Since most of these controllers are driver-assist systems, their objective is to retain the vehicle dynamic state in operating regions familiar to drivers. In general, this implies that the controller will keep the tire in its linear region and avoid excessive slipping, skidding, or sliding.

Keywords

Active yaw control Electronic stability control Evasive maneuvers Lateral dynamics Traction assist Traction control Vehicle stability assist 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Ahn C, Peng H, Tseng HE (2013) Robust estimation of road frictional coefficient. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 21(1):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borrelli F, Bemporad A, Fodor M, Hrovat D (2006) An MPC/hybrid system approach to traction control. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 14(2):541–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carlson CR, Gerdes JC (2003) Nonlinear estimation of longitudinal tire slip under several driving conditions. Paper presented in American control conference, Denver, June 2003Google Scholar
  4. Dang JN (2004) Preliminary results analyzing the effectiveness of electronic stability control (ESC) systems, Report no. DOT HS-809-790. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  5. Deur J, Asgari J, Hrovat D (2004) A 3D brush-type dynamic tire friction model, vehicle system dynamics. Int J Veh Mech Mobil 42(3):133–173Google Scholar
  6. Deur J, Ivanovi V, Hancock M, Assadian F (2010) Modeling and analysis of active differential dynamics. ASME J Dyn Syst Meas Control 132(6):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Di Cairano S, Tseng HE, Bernardini D, Bemporad A (2013) Vehicle yaw stability control by coordinated active front steering and differential braking in the tire sideslip angles domain. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 21(4):1236–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Falcone P, Tseng HE, Borrelli F, Asgari J, Hrovat D (2008) MPC-based yaw and lateral stabilization via active front steering and braking. Veh Syst Dyn 46(S1):611–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ferguson S A (2007) The effectiveness of electronic stability control in reducing real-world crashes: a literature review. Traffic Inj Prev 8(4):329–338MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fodor M, Yester J, Hrovat D (1998) Active control of vehicle dynamics. Paper presented in 17th AIAA/IEEE/SAE digital avionics systems conference, SeattleCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gustafsson F (1996) Estimation and change detection of tire-road friction using the wheel slip. In: Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE international symposium, computer-aided control system design, Dearborn, pp 99–104Google Scholar
  12. Healey JR (2005) Ford’s 2006 Fusion Review, “Traction control on the V-6 test car was just right …”. http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/money/autos/reviews/healey/2005-10-27-fusion_x.htm posted on 27 Oct 2005. Accessed on 30 Aug 2013
  13. Hrovat D (1997) Survey of advanced suspension developments and related optimal control applications. Automatica 33(10):1781–1817MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hrovat D, Asgari J, Fodor M (2000) Automotive mechatronic systems. In: Leondes CT (ed) Mechatronic systems techniques and applications: volume 2 – transportation and vehicular systems. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Amsterdam, pp 1–98Google Scholar
  15. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) (2006) Electronic stability control could prevent nearly one-third of all fatal crashes and reduce rollover risk by as much as 80%; effect is found on single- and multiple-vehicle crashes, News Release 13 June 2006. http://www.iihs.org/news/rss/pr061306.html Accessed 30 Aug 2013
  16. Lu J, Messih D, Salib A, Harmison D (2007) An enhancement to an electronic stability control system to include a rollover control function. SAE Trans 116:303–313Google Scholar
  17. Manning WJ, Crolla, DA (2007) A review of yaw rate and sideslip controllers for passenger vehicles. Trans Inst Meas Control 29(1):117–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ryu J, Rossetter EJ, Gerdes JC (2002) Vehicle sideslip and roll parameter estimation using GPS. In: Proceedings of AVEC 2002 6th international symposium of advanced vehicle control, HiroshimaGoogle Scholar
  19. Tseng HE (2001) Dynamic estimation of road bank angle. Veh Syst Dyn 36(4–5):307–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tseng HE (2002) A sliding mode lateral velocity observer. In: Proceedings of AVEC 2002 6th international symposium on advanced vehicle control, Hiroshima, pp 387–392Google Scholar
  21. Tseng HE, Ashrafi B, Madau D, Brown AT, Recker D (1999) The development of vehicle stability control at Ford. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 4(2):223–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tseng HE, Xu L, Hrovat D (2007) Estimation of land vehicle roll and pitch angles. Veh Syst Dyn 45(5):433–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Van Zanten AT (2000) Bosch ESP systems: 5 years of experience. SAE Trans 109(7):428–436Google Scholar
  24. Xu L, Tseng HE (2007) Robust model-based fault detection for a roll stability control system. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 15(2):519–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ford Motor CompanyDearbornUSA