Skip to main content

Machining Process Monitoring

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Manufacturing Engineering and Technology

Abstract

In the modern manufacturing industry, monitoring the machining process and tool condition is becoming increasingly important in order to achieve better product quality, higher productivity, higher process automation, and lower human labor costs. This chapter introduces the fundamental technologies and state-of-the-art development for machining process monitoring. After a brief introduction of the background, in section “Measurands and Sensors,” the commonly used measurands for machining process monitoring are presented, including motor power and current, force, torque, acoustic emission, vibration, image, temperature, displacement, strain, etc. The corresponding sensors for these measurands, and the requirement for signal conditioning, are also discussed. Signal conditioning includes amplification, filtering, converting, range matching, isolation, and other processes to make sensor output suitable for data acquisition and signal processing. Knowledge of data acquisition, which is the process of sampling sensor signals and converts the resulting samples into digital numeric values that can be manipulated by a computer, is provided in section “Data Acquisition.” Some key concepts such as analog-to-digital conversion, quantization, sampling rate, Nyquist sampling theorem, and aliasing are explained. Section “Signal Processing” introduces the essential signal process techniques, including the time domain analysis, frequency domain analysis, time-frequency domain analysis, and artificial intelligence approaches such as artificial neural networks, fuzzy logic, etc. Detailed machining process monitoring strategies and approaches, together with some examples and case studies, are provided in section “Monitoring Strategies and Approaches,” which covers the topics of tool wear estimation, tool breakage detection, chatter detection, surface integrity, and chip monitoring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abburi NR, Dixit US (2006) A knowledge-based system for the prediction of surface roughness in turning process. Robot Comp Integr Manuf 22(4):363–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abellan-Nebot J, Romero Subirón F (2010) A review of machining monitoring systems based on artificial intelligence process models. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 47(1–4):237–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Achiche S, Balazinski M, Baron L, Jemielniak K (2002) Tool wear monitoring using genetically-generated fuzzy knowledge bases. Eng Appl Artif Intel 15(3–4):303–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altintas Y (2000) Manufacturing automation: metal cutting mechanics, machine tool vibrations, and CNC design. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreasen JL, De Chiffre L (1998) An automatic system for elaboration of chip breaking diagrams. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 47(1):35–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrazola PJ, Arriola I, Davies MA, Cooke AL, Dutterer BS (2008) The effect of machinability on thermal fields in orthogonal cutting of AISI 4140 steel. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 57(1):65–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axinte DA, Gindy N (2003) Tool condition monitoring in broaching. Wear 254(3–4):370–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axinte DA, Gindy N, Fox K, Unanue I (2004) Process monitoring to assist the workpiece surface quality in machining. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 44(10):1091–1108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne G, Dornfeld D, Inasaki I, Konig W, Teti R (1995) Tool condition monitoring (TCM) – the status of research and industrial application. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 44(2):541–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen JC, Huang B (2003) An in-process neural network-based surface roughness prediction (INN-SRP) system using a dynamometer in end milling operations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 21(5):339–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen XQ, Zeng H, Li HZ (2008) In-process sensing and monitoring for intelligent machining: overview and implementation. Int J Process Syst Eng (IJPSE) 1:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho S, Asfour S, Onar A, Kaundinya N (2005) Tool breakage detection using support vector machine learning in a milling process. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 45(3):241–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chungchoo C, Saini D (2002) On-line tool wear estimation in CNC turning operations using fuzzy neural network model. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 42(1):29–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çolak O, Kurbanoğlu C, Kayacan MC (2007) Milling surface roughness prediction using evolutionary programming methods. Mater Design 28(2):657–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies MA, Ueda T, M’Saoubi R, Mullany B, Cooke AL (2007) On the measurement of temperature in material removal processes. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 56(2):581–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gandarias E, Dimov S, Pham DT, Ivanov A, Popov K, Lizarralde R, Arrazola PJ (2006) New methods for tool failure detection in micromilling. Proc IMechE Part B: J Eng Manuf 220(B2):137–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin J, Chen X (2009) Multiple classification of the acoustic emission signals extracted during burn and chatter anomalies using genetic programming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 45(11–12):1152–1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim Nur T, Mekdeci C, McLaughlin C (1995) Detection of tool failure in end milling with wavelet transformations and neural networks (WT-NN). Int J Mach Tool Manuf 35(8):1137–1147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jemielniak K (1999) Commercial tool condition monitoring systems. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 15(10):711–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jemielniaka K, Tetib R, Kossakowskaa J, Segretob T (2006) Innovative signal processing for cutting force based chip form prediction. In: 2nd Virtual Integration Conference on IPROMS, Ischia, pp 7–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim H-Y, Ahn J-H (2002) Chip disposal state monitoring in drilling using neural network based spindle motor power sensing. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 42(10):1113–1119

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J-D, Kim D-S (1997) Development of a combined-type tool dynamometer with a piezo-film accelerometer for an ultra-precision lathe. J Mater Process Technol 71(3):360–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim HY, Ahn JH, Kim SH, Takata S (2002) Real-time drill wear estimation based on spindle motor power. J Mater Process Technol 124(3):267–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuljanic E, Sortino M, Totis G (2008) Multisensor approaches for chatter detection in milling. J Sound Vib 312(4–5):672–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuljanic E, Totis G, Sortino M (2009) Development of an intelligent multisensor chatter detection system in milling. Mech Syst Signal Process 23(5):1704–1718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurada S, Bradley C (1997) A review of machine vision sensors for tool condition monitoring. Comput Indus 34(1):55–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanzetta M (2001) A new flexible high-resolution vision sensor for tool condition monitoring. J Mater Process Technol 119(1–3):73–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latha B, Senthilkumar VS (2010) Modeling and analysis of surface roughness parameters in drilling GFRP composites using fuzzy logic. Mater Manuf Process 25(8):817–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Coz G, Marinescu M, Devillez A, Dudzinski D, Velnom L (2012) Measuring temperature of rotating cutting tools: application to MQL drilling and dry milling of aerospace alloys. Appl Thermal Eng 36:434–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Elbestawi MA (1996) Fuzzy clustering for automated tool condition monitoring in machining. Mech Syst Signal Process 10(5):533–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li HZ, Zeng H, Chen XQ (2006) An experimental study of tool wear and cutting force variation in the end milling of Inconel 718 with coated carbide inserts. J Mater Process Technol 180(1–3):296–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Li HZ, Chen XQ, Zeng H, Li XP (2007) Embedded tool condition monitoring for intelligent machining. Int J Comp Appl Technol 28(1):74–81

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Li HZ, Albrecht A, Chen XQ (2009) A tool wear observer model for flank wear monitoring in the milling of nickel-based alloys. Int J Mech Manuf Syst 2(5/6):620–637

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang SY, Hecker RL, Landers RG (2004) Machining process monitoring and control: the state-of-the-Art. J Manuf Sci Eng 126(2):297–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marinescu I, Axinte D (2009) A time-frequency acoustic emission-based monitoring technique to identify workpiece surface malfunctions in milling with multiple teeth cutting simultaneously. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 49(1):53–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowicki B, Jarkiewicz A (1998) In-process surface roughness measurement using fringe field capacitive (FFC) method. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 38(5–6):725–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozel T, Karpat Y (2005) Predictive modeling of surface roughness and tool wear in hard turning using regression and neural networks. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 45(4–5):467–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salgado DR, Alonso FJ (2007) An approach based on current and sound signals for in-process tool wear monitoring. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 47(14):2140–2152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salgado DR, Alonso FJ, Cambero I, Marcelo A (2009) In-process surface roughness prediction system using cutting vibrations in turning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 43(1–2):40–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Susanto V, Chen JC (2003) Fuzzy logic based in-process tool-wear monitoring system in face milling operations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 21(3):186–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Teti R, Jemielniak K, O’Donnell G, Dornfeld D (2010) Advanced monitoring of machining operations. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 59(2):717–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai Y-H, Chen JC, Lou S-J (1999) An in-process surface recognition system based on neural networks in end milling cutting operations. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 39(4):583–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ueda T, Hosokawa A, Oda K, Yamada K (2001) Temperature on flank face of cutting tool in high speed milling. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 50(1):37–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Mehrabi MG, Kannatey-Asibu E Jr (2002) Hidden Markov model-based tool wear monitoring in turning. Trans ASME J Manuf Sci Eng 124(3):651–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Wang W, Huang Y, Nguyen N, Krishnakumar K (2008) Design of neural network-based estimator for tool wear modeling in hard turning. J Intell Manuf 19(4):383–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao Z, Mei D, Chen Z (2010) On-line chatter detection and identification based on wavelet and support vector machine. J Mater Process Technol 210(5):713–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Zhang C, Guo S, Zhou L (2012) Research on tool wear detection based on machine vision in end milling process. Product Eng 6(4–5):431–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huaizhong Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag London

About this entry

Cite this entry

Li, H., Chen, Y. (2015). Machining Process Monitoring. In: Nee, A. (eds) Handbook of Manufacturing Engineering and Technology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4670-4_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics