Chemical Absorption


In order to explain the principle of chemical absorption, the equations of vapor–liquid equilibrium are first introduced and the effects on gas solubility caused by temperature and pressure are also covered. Amine-based systems, carbonate-based systems, aqueous ammonia, membranes, enzyme-based systems, and ionic liquids–based system are discussed as the typical and emerging state of the art for chemical absorption. Furthermore, design rule and method are given to help complete the design of typical chemical absorption systems. The key issues to hinder the application of chemical absorption are discussed, such as water-consumption-related issues, environmental effects, and economical factors. Finally, applications and future directions are discussed.


Ionic Liquid Chemical Absorption Fugitive Emission Super Gravity Regeneration Energy Consumption 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Semeonova TA, Lieyijiesi ИЛ (1982) Purification of industrial gas. Research Institute of Nanjing Chemical Industrial Corporation translation. Chemical industry press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blauwhoff PMM, Versteeg GF, Van Swaaij WPM (1984) A study on the reaction between CO2 and alkanolamines in aqueous solutions. Chem Eng Sci 39:207–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    MOEA Industrial Development Bureau (2002) The technique manual on the recovery of carbon dioxide by absorption, TaiwanGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mandal BP, Bandyopadhyay SS (2006) Absorption of carbon dioxide into aqueous blends of 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol and monoethanolamine. Chem Eng Sci 61:5440–5447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rubin ES, Rao AB (2002) A technical economic and environmental assessment of amine-based CO2 capture technology for power plant greenhouse gas control. Annual Technical Progress ReportCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    BP America (2005) CO2 Capture Project Technical Report DEFC26-01NT41145, National Energy Technology LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hakka L (2007) Cansolv Technologies Inc., private communicationGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rochelle G (2006) Private communicationGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Resnik KP, Garber W, Hreha DC, Yeh JT, Pennline HW (2006) A parametric scan for regenerative ammonia-based scrubbing for the capture of CO2. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Pittsburgh Coal Conference, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yeh JT, Resnik KP, Rygle K, Pennline HW (2005) Semibatch absorption and regeneration studies for CO2 capture by aqueous ammonia. Fuel Process Technol 86(14–15):1533–1546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Resnik KP, Yeh JT, Pennline HW (2004) Aqua ammonia process for simultaneous removal of CO2, SO2 and NOx. Int J Environ Technol Manage 4(1/2):89–104Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Black S (2006) Chilled ammonia scrubber for CO2 capture. MIT Carbon Sequestration Forum VII, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pederson O, Dannstrom H, Gronvold M, Stuksrud D, Ronning O (2000) Gas treating using membrane gas/liquid contactors. In: Fifth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Cairns, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yeon SH, Lee KS, Sea B, Park YI, Lee KH (2005) Application of pilot-scale membrane contactor hybrid system for removal of carbon dioxide from flue gas. J Membr Sci 257:156–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Trachtenberg MC, Tu CK, Landers RA, Wilson RC, McGregor ML, Laipis PJ, Paterson M, Silverman DN, Thomas D, Smith RL, Rudolph FB (1999) Carbon dioxide transport by proteic and facilitated transport membranes. Life Support Biosph Sci 6:293–302Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yang WC, Ciferno J (2006) Assessment of carbozyme enzyme-based membrane technology for CO2 capture from flue gas. DOE/NETL 401/072606Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Figueroa JD, Fout T, Plasynski S, McIlvried H, Srivastava RD (2008) Advances in CO2 capture technology – the U.S. Department of Energy’s carbon sequestration program. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2:9–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Boa L, Trachtenberg MC (2006) Facilitated transport of CO2 across a liquid membrane: comparing enzyme, amine, and alkaline. J Membr Sci 280:330–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Maddox RN (1985) Gas conditioning and processing, Vol. 4, gas and liquid sweetening, Campbell Petroleum SeriesGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kohl AL, Nielsen R (1997) Gas purification, 5th edn. Gulf Publishing Company, HoustonGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mamun S et al (2007) Selection of new absorbents for carbon dioxide capture. Energy Conv Manag 48:251–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sakwattanapong R et al (2005) Behavior of reboiler heat duty for CO2 capture plants using regenerable single and blended alkanolamines. Ind Eng Chem Res 44:4465–4473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Desideri U, Paolucci A (1999) Performance modelling of a carbon dioxide removal system for power plants. Energ Convers Manag 40:1899–1915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Okabe K, Mano H, Fujioka Y (2008) Separation and recovery of carbon dioxide by a membrane flash process. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2:485–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schwartz HA (1982) Chain decomposition of aqueous triethanolamine. J Phys Chem 86:3431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lente G, Fabian I (1998) The early phase of the iron(III)–sulfite ion reaction. Formation of a novel iron(III)–sulfito complex. Inorg Chem 37:4204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Van Eldik R, Coichev N, Bal Reddy K, Gerhard A (1992) Metal ion catalyzed autoxidation of sulfur (IV) oxides: redox cycling of metal ions induced by sulfite. Ber Bunsenges Phys Chem 96:478Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Goff GS, Rochelle GT (2006) Oxidation inhibitors for copper and iron catalyzed degradation of monoethanolamine in CO2 capture processes. Ind Eng Chem Res 45:2513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hakka LE, Ouimet MA (2006) U.S. Patent 7,056,482, 6 June 2006Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Liu X, Sawyer DT, Bedell SA, Worley CM (1995) Ligand degradation in the iron/dioxygen-induced dehydrogenation of H2S. Paper presented at the Seventh Sulfur Recovery Conference, Austin, TX, 24 Sept 1995Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bedell SA (2009) Oxidative degradation mechanisms for amines in flue gas capture. Energy Procedia 1:771–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Meng H et al (2008) Removal of heat stable salts from aqueous solutions of N-methyldiethanolamine using a specially designed three-compartment configuration electrodialyzer. J Membr Sci 322:436–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nguyen T et al (2010) Amine volatility in CO2 capture. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 4(5):707–715Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    DuPart MS, Bacon TR, Edwards DJ (1993) Understanding corrosion in alkanolamine gas treating plants. Part 2. Case histories show actual plant problems and their solutions. Hydrocarbon Process April:75–80Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rampin P (2000) Amine units: results of a survey on structural reliability. In: Proceedings of International Conference Corrosion in Refinery, Petrochemical and Power Generation Plants, Venezia, pp 18–19Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Koch G (2001) Corrosion cost preventive strategies in the Unites States. CC Technologies & NACE international (Sponsored by Office of Infrastructure and Development Federal Highway Administration)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Veawab A, Aroonwilas A (2002) Identification of oxidizing agents in aqueous amine–CO2 systems using a mechanistic corrosion model. Corros Sci 44:967–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Soosaiprakasam IR (2008) Corrosion and polarization behavior of carbon steel in MEA2 based CO2 capture process. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2(4):553–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cai Z, Xie R, Wu Z (1996) Binary isobaric vapor–liquid equilibria of ethanolamines + water. J Chem Eng Data 41:1101–1103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Larsen BL, Rasmussen P, Fredenslund A (1987) A modified UNIFAC group contribution model for prediction of phase equilibria and heats of mixing. Ind Eng Chem Res 26:2274–2286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    McLees JA (2006) Vapor–liquid equilibrium of monoethanolamine/piperazine/water at 35–70°C. M.S.E. thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, AustinGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Touhara H, Okazaki S, Okino F, Tanaka H, Ikari K, Nakanishi K (1982) Thermodynamic properties of aqueous mixtures of hydrophilic compounds 2-aminoethanol and its methyl derivatives. J Chem Thermodyn 14:145–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Nath A, Bender E (1983) Isothermal vapor–liquid equilibria of binary and ternary mixtures containing alcohol, alkanolamine, and water with a new static device. J Chem Eng Data 26:370–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Singh P, Niederer JPM, Versteeg GF (2007) Structure and activity relationships for amine based CO2 absorbents – I. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 1:5–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Thitakamol B, Veawab A, Aroonwilas A (2007) Environmental impacts of absorption-based CO2 capture unit for post-combustion treatment of flue gas from coal-fired power plant. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 1:318–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Camacho F, Sánchez S, Pacheco R, Sánchez A, La Rubia MD (2005) Absorption of carbon dioxide at high partial pressures in aqueous solutions of di-isopropanolamine. Ind Eng Chem Res 44:7451–7457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Teramoto M, Kitada S, Ohnishi N, Matsuyama H, Matsumiya N (2004) Separation and concentration of CO2 by capillary-type facilitated transport membrane module with permeation of carrier solution. J Membr Sci 234:83–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Vaidya PD, Kenig EY (2007) Absorption of CO2 into aqueous blends of alkanolamines prepared from renewable resources. Chem Eng Sci 62:7344–7350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Rinker EB, Ashour SS, Sandall OC (1995) Kinetics and modelling of carbon dioxide absorption into aqueous solutions of N-methyldiethanolamine. Chem Eng Sci 50:755–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Horng CT, Li M (2002) Bottom spin valves with continuous spacer exchange bias. US Patent, 6466418Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ma’mun S, Jakobsen JP, Svendsen HF (2006) Experimental and modeling study of the solubility of carbon dioxide in aqueous 30 mass % 2-((2-aminoethyl)amino)ethanol solution. Ind Eng Chem Res 45:2505–2512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Derks PWJ, Dijkstra HBS, Hogendoorn JA, Versteeg GF (2005) Solubility of carbon dioxide in aqueous piperazine solutions. AIChE J 51:2311–2327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Aroonwilas A, Veawab A (2004) Integration of CO2 capture unit using single- and blended-amines into supercritical coal-fired power plants: implications for emission and energy management. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 1:143–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Kumar PS, Hogendoorn JA, Feron PHM, Versteeg GF (2003) Equilibrium solubility of CO2 in aqueous potassium taurate solutions: Part 1. Crystallization in carbon dioxide loaded aqueous salt solutions of amino acids. Ind Eng Chem Res 42:2832–2840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Harris F, Kurnia KA, Mutalib MIA, Thanapalan M (2009) Solubilities of carbon dioxide an densities of aqueous sodium glycinate solutions before and after CO2 absorption. J Chem Eng Data 54:144–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Oyenekan BA, Rochelle GT (2009) Rate modeling of CO2 stripping from potassium carbonate promoted by piperazine. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 3:121–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Fei weiyang (2005) Liquid effective velocity in a column containing corrugated metal sheet packing. Chem Ind Eng Process 24:1–4Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Shuiping Yan, Mengxiang Fang et al (2007) Experimental study on the separation of CO2 from flue gas using hollow fiber membrane contactors without wetting. Fuel Process Technol 88(5):501–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Ramshaw C, Mallinson RH (1981) Mass transfer process. U.S. Patent 4,283,255Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Shuiping Yan, Mengxiang Fang et al (2009) Regeneration of CO2 from CO2-rich alkanolamines solution by using reduced thickness and vacuum technology: Regeneration feasibility and characteristic of thin-layer solvent. Chem Eng Process 48:515–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Jianfeng Chen (2002) Super-gravity technology and its application, Chemical industry press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Minggong Chen (2006) Super-gravity absorption reactors for CO2 removal from flue gas. CN 2829861YGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Fisher KS, Beitler C, Rueter C, Searcy K, Rochelle GT, Jassim M (2005) Integrating MEA regeneration with CO2 compression and peaking to reduce CO2 capture costs. U.S.: Final Report of Work Performed Under Grant No.: DE-FG02-04ER84111, 09 June 2005Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Jassim MS, Rochelle GT (2006) Innovative absorber/stripper configurations for CO2 capture by aqueous monoethanolamine. Ind Eng Res 45:2465–2472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Teramoto M, Ohnishi N, Takeuchi N, Kitada S, Matsuyama H, Matsumiya N, Mano H (2003) Separation and enrichment of carbon dioxide by capillary membrane module with permeation of carrier solution. Sep Purif Technol 30:215–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Matsumiya N, Teramoto M, Kitada S, Matsuyama H (2005) Evaluation of energy consumption for separation of CO2 in flue gas by hollow fiber facilitated transport membrane module with permeation of amine solution. Sep Purif Technol 46:26–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Mimura T, Suda T, Honda A, Kumazawa H (1998) Kinetics of reaction between carbon dioxide and sterically hindered amines for carbon dioxide recovery from power plant flue gases. Chem Eng Commun 170:245–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Shuiping Yan, Mengxiang Fang et al (2008) Comparative analysis of CO2 separation from flue gas by membrane gas absorption technology and chemical absorption technology in China. Energy Convers Manage 49:3188–3197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Kang MS, Moon SH, Park YI, Lee KH (2002) Development of carbon dioxide separation process using continuous hollow-fiber membrane contactor and water-splitting electrodialysis. Sep Sci Technol 37:1789–1806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Eric Shuster (2010) Estimating freshwater needs to meet future thermoelectric generation requirements, DOE/ NETL-400/2010/1339. 7–14Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Kvamsdal HM, Rochelle GT (2008) Effects of temperature in CO2 absorption from flue gas by aqueous mono-ethanolamine. Ind Eng Chem Res 43(3):867–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Kvamsdal HM et al (2010) Maintaining a neutral water balance in a 450 MWe NGCC-CCS power system with post-combustion carbon dioxide capture aimed at offshore operation. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 4:613–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Eide-Haugmo I et al (2009) Environmental impact of amines. Energy Procedia 1:1297–1304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Chapel DG, Mariz CL, Ernest J (1999) Recovery of CO2 from flue gases: commercial trends.
  75. 75.
    Schnell I (2004) Dipolar recoupling in fast-MAS solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Chem Inform 35. doi: 10.1002/chin.200451274Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Haslegrave JA, Hedges WM, Montgomerie HTR, O’Brien TM (1992) The development of corrosion inhibitors with low-environmental toxicity. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, 4–7 October 1992, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    McMahon AJ, Harrop D (1995) Green corrosion inhibitors: an oil company perspective. In: CORROSION 95, HoustonGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Crognale G (1999) Environmental management strategies: the 21st century perspective. Air and Waste Management Association, Sewickley, PAGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Bacon JR, Demas JN (1987) Determination of oxygen concentrations by luminescence quenching of a polymer-immobilized transition-metal complex. Anal Chem 59(23):2780–2785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Bhurisa Thitakamol et al (2007) Environmental impacts of absorption-based CO2 capture unit for post-combustion treatment of flue gas from coal-fired power plant. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 1(3):318–342Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Source: IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage, 2005Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Hu L (2009) Phase transitional absorption method. U.S. Patent 7541011Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Agar DW, Tan YH, Hui ZX (2008) Separation CO2 from gas mixtures. Patent WO 2008/015217Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Mandal BP, Bandyopadhyay SS (2005) Simulation absorption of carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide into aqueous blends of 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol and diethanolamine. Chem Eng Sci 60:6438–6451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Mandal BP, Bandyopadhyay SS (2006) Simultaneous absorption of CO2 and H2S into aqueous blends of N-methyldiethanolamine and diethanolamine. Environ Sci Technol 40:6076–6084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Mandal BP, Guba M, Biswas AK, Bandyopadhyay SS (2001) Removal of carbon dioxide by absorption in mixed amines: modeling of absorption in aqueous MDEA/MEA and AMP/MEA solutions. Chem Eng Sci 56:6217–6224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Mandal BP, Kundu M, Padhiyar NU, Bandyopadhyay SS (2004) Physical solubility and diffusivity of N2O and CO2 into aqueous solutions of (2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol + diethanolamine) and (N-methyldiethanolamine + diethanolamine). J Chem Eng Data 49:264–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Rochelle G, Chen E, Dugas R, Oyenakan B, Seibert F (2006) Solvent and process enhancements for CO2 absorption/stripping. In: 2005 Annual Conference on Capture and Sequestration, Alexandria, VAGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Chia-Chang Lin, Wen-Tzong Liu, Chung-sung Tan (1990) Removal of carbon dioxide by absorption in a rotating packed bed. Ind Eng Chem Res 29:917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Oyenekan BA, Rochelle GT (2007) Alternative stripper configurations for CO2 capture by aqueous amines. AIChE J 53(12):3144–3154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Oyenekan BA, Rochelle GT (2006) Energy performance of stripper configurations for CO2 capture by aqueous amines. Ind Eng Chem Res 45(8):2457–2464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Polderman LD, Dillon CP et al (1955) Why monoethanolamine solution breaks down in gas treating service. In: Proceedings of the Gas Conditioning Conference, pp 49–56Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Yazvikova NV, Zelenskaya LG et al (1975) Mechanism of side reactions during removal of carbon dioxide from gases by treatment with monoethanolamine. Z Prik Khim 48(3):674–676Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Davis J, Rochelle GT (2009) Thermal degradation of monoethanolamine at stripper conditions. Energy Procedia 1:327–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Rooney PC, DuPart MS, Bacon TR (1998) Oxygen’s role in alkanolamine degradation. Hydrocarbon Process 77(7):109–113Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Suzuki M (2007) Ligand effects on dioxygen activation by copper and nickel complexes: reactivity and intermediates. Acc Chem Res 40:609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Korendovych IV, Kryatov SV, Rybak-Akimova EV (2007) Dioxygen activation at non-heme iron: insights from rapid kinetic studies. Acc Chem Res 40:510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Buxton GV (1988) Critical review of rate constants for reactions of hydrated electrons, hydrogen atoms and hydroxyl radicals (OH radical dot/O radical dot–) in aqueous solution. J Phys Chem Ref Data 17:513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Bedell SA, Myers J (1994) Chelating agent formulation for hydrogen sulfide abatement. U.S. 5,338,778, 16 Aug 1994Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Lalevee J, Allonas X, Fouassier J-P (2002) NH and α (CH) bond dissociation enthalpies of aliphatic amines. J Am Chem Soc 124:9613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Mogul MG (1999) Reduce corrosion in amine gas absorption columns. Hydrocarbon Process 78(10):47–56Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Soosaiprakasam IR, Veawab A (2008) Corrosion and polarization behavior of carbon steel in MEA-based CO2 capture process. Int J Green House Gas Control 2:553–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Lenard J, Rousseau R, Teja A (1990) Vapor–liquid equilibria for mixtures of 2-aminoethanol + water. AIChE Symp Ser 86(279):1–5Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Ermatchkov V, Kamps AP-S, Speyer D, Maurer G (2006) Solubility of carbon dioxide in aqueous solutions of piperazine in the low gas loading region. J Chem Eng Data 51:1788–1796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Svendsen HF, Tobiesen FA, Mejdell T et al (2007) Method and apparatus for energy reduction in acid gas capture processes. Patent WO 2007/001190Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Rojey A, Cadours R, Carrette P-L et al (2007) Process for deacidification of a gas by means of an absorbent solution with fractionated regeneration by heating. Patent WO 2007/104856Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Singh D, Croiset E, Douglas PL, Douglas MA (2002) Economics of CO2 capture from a coal-fired power plant – a sensitivity analysis. In: Proceedings of the sixth conference on greenhouse gas control technologies (GHGT-6), KyotoGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    White CM, Strazisar BR, Granite EJ (2003) Separation and capture of CO2 from large stationary sources and sequestration in geological formations: coalbeds and deep saline aquifers. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 53(6):645–715Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Thermal Power EngineeringZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations