Skip to main content

Earthquake Scaling Laws

  • Reference work entry

Article Outline

Glossary

Definition of the Subject

Introduction

Earthquakes and Seismic Radiation

Earthquake Fault Models: The Scaling of Geometry and Stress

Earthquake Dynamics and the Scaling of Energy

Kinematics and Statistical Models for Fault Slip

Future Directions

Acknowledgments

Bibliography

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

Seismic moment:

The most fundamental measure of the size of an earthquake. In the simplest situation it represents the moment of on of the couples of forces that make up a dipolar source. In more general cases it is a 3 by 3 symmetric tensor of elementary force couples.

Seismic radiation:

The seismic waves emitted by a seismic source. For point sources these are spherical P and S waves emitted by the point tensor source.

Seismic spectrum:

The absolute value of the Fourier transform of the displacement field radiated by an earthquake in the far field. For almost all earthquakes it has a common shape: flat at low frequencies and decays like the inverse squared power at high very high values of frequency.

Corner frequency:

The low and high frequency asymptotes of the earthquake spectrum intersect at a characteristic frequency, called the corner frequency. The corner frequency scales with the size of the earthquake measured by the seismic moment.

Radiated or seismic energy:

Total energy of the seismic waves radiated by a seismic source. It can be computed from the energy flow relatively far from the source of the earthquake.

Apparent stress:

Originally defined as the product of seismic efficiency times the average stress during earthquake slip. In practice, it is computed from the ratio of radiated energy to moment release of the earthquake multiplied by the shear modulus.

Energy release rate:

Amount of energy per unit surface used to make a rupture advance by a unit distance.

Static stress drop:

The static change in shear traction between the sides of the fault occurs during an earthquake. In principle, it could be determined by measuring stress before and after the earthquake. In practice stress drop is computed using very specific source models, like a circular crack.

Dynamic stress drop:

The stress change in shear traction as a function of time while the rupture is still growing. It can only be estimated from seismic records obtained in the near field by elaborate inversion schemes. The relation between static and dynamic stress drop can only be estimated once the friction law between the sides of the fault has been defined.

Bibliography

  1. Abercrombie RE (1995) Earthquake source scaling relationships from −1 to 5 ML using seismograms recorded at 2.5 km depth. J Geophys Res 100:24015–24036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abercrombie RE, Rice JR (2005) Can observations of earthquake scaling constrain slip weakening? Geophys J Int 162:406–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aki K (1966) Generation and propagation of G waves from the Niigata earthquake of June 16, (1964) part 2. Estimation of earthquake movement, released energy, and stress-strain drop from G wave spectrum. Bull Earthq Res Inst Univ Tokyo 44:23–88

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aki K (1967) Scaling law of seismic spectrums. J Geophys Res 72:1217–1231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Aki K, Richards PG (2002) Quantitative Seismology, 2nd edn. University Science Books, Sausalito

    Google Scholar 

  6. Andrews DJ (1980) A stochastic fault model: 1. Static case. J Geophys Res 85:3867–3877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bernard P, Herrero A (1994) A kinematic self-similar rupture process for earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84:1216–1228

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bernard P, Madariaga R (1984) A new asymptotic method for the modeling of near-field accelerograms. Bull Seismol Soc Am 74:539–557

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bernard P, Herrero A, Berge C (1996) Modeling directivity of heterogeneous earthquake ruptures. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86:1149–1160

    Google Scholar 

  10. Beroza G, Kanamori H (2007) Comprehensive overview in Treatise on geophysics. In: Schubert G (ed) Earthquake Seismology. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  11. Boatwright J (1978) Detailed spectral analysis of two small New York State earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 68:1177–1131

    Google Scholar 

  12. Boatwright J (1980) A spectral theory for circular seismic sources: Simple estimates of source dimension, dynamic stress drop, and radiated energy. Bull Seism Soc Am 70:1–26

    Google Scholar 

  13. Boatwright J (1982) A dynamic model for far field acceleration. Bull Seism Soc Am 72:1049–1068

    Google Scholar 

  14. Boatwright J (1988) The seismic radiation from composite models of faulting. Bull Seism Soc Am 78:489–508

    Google Scholar 

  15. Boatwright J, Fletcher JB (1985) The partition of radiated energy between P and S waves. Bull Seismol Soc Am 75:361–376

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bouchon M (1997) The state of stress on some faults of the San Andreas Fault system as inferred from near-field strong‐motion data. Bull Seismol Soc Am 58:367–398

    Google Scholar 

  17. Brune JN (1970) Tectonic stress and spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes. J Geophys Res 75:4997–5009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Brune JN (1971) Correction. J Geophy Res 76:5002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Brune JN, Archuleta RJ, Hartzell S (1979) Far-field S wave spectra, corner frequencies, and pulse shapes. J Geophys Res 84:2262–2272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Eshelby JD (1957) The elastic field of an ellipsoid inclusion and related Problems. Proc R Soc Lond A 241:376–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Freund LB (1972) Energy flow into the tip of an extending crack in an elastic solid. J Elast 2:341–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Freund LB (1989) Fracture Dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1942) Earthquake magnitude, intensity, energy, and acceleration. Bull Seism Soc Am 32:163–191

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1956) Earthquake magnitude, intensity, energy, and acceleration (second paper). Bull Seism Soc Am 46:105–145

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hanks TC (1979) b values and \({w^{-g}}\) seismic source models: Implications for tectonic stress variations along active crustal fault zones and the estimation of high‐frequency ground motion. J Geophs Res 84:2235–2242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hanks TC (1981) The corner frequency shift, earthquake source models, and Q. Bull Seismol Soc Am 71:597–612

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hanks TC (1982) fmax. Bull Seismol Soc Am 72:1867–1879

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hanks TC, Kanamori H (1979) A moment magnitude scale. J Geophys Res 84:2348–2350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hanks T, Thatcher W (1972) A graphical representation of seismic source parameters. J Geophys Res 77:4393–4405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Haskell NA (1964) Total energy spectral density of elastic wave radiation from propagating faults. Bull Seism Soc Am 54:1811–1841

    Google Scholar 

  31. Haskell NA (1966) Total energy spectral density of elastic wave radiation from propagating faults: Part II. A statistical source model. Bull Seism Soc Am 56:125–140

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ide S (2002) Estimation of Radiated energy of finite‐source earthquake models. Bull Seism Soc Am 92:2294–3005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ide S, Beroza GC (2001) Does apparent stress vary with earthquake size? Geophys Res Letters 28:3349–3352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ide S, Takeo M (1997) Determination of constitutive relations of fault slip based on seismic wave analysis. J Geophys Res 102(27)379–391

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ide S, Beroza GC, Prejean SG, Ellsworth WL (2003) Apparent Break in Earthquake Scaling Due to Path and Site Effects on Deep Borehole Recordings. J Geophys Res 108(B5)2271. doi:10.1029/2001JB001617

  36. Jost M, Busselberg LT, Jost O, Harjes HP (1998) Source parameters of injection‐induced microearthquakes at 9 km depth at the KTB deep drilling site, Germany. Bull Seismol Soc Am 88:815–832

    Google Scholar 

  37. Joyner WB (1984) A scaling law for the spectra of large earthquakes. Bull Seism Soc Am 74:1167–1188

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kanamori H (1977) The energy release in great earthquakes. J Geophys Res 82:2921–2987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kanamori H, Anderson DL (1975) Theoretical basis of some empirical relations in seismology. Bull Seismol Soc Am 65:2981–2987

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kanamori H, Rivera L (2004) Static and Dynamic Scaling Relations for Earthquakes and their implications for Rupture Speed and Stress Drop. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94:314–319. http://www.gps.caltech.edu/faculty/kanamori/static_dynamic_scaling_relations.pdf

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kanamori H, Mori J, Hauksson E, Heaton TH, Hutton LK, Jones LM (1993) Determination of earthquake energy release and M L using Terrascope. Bull Seismol Soc Am 83:330–346

    Google Scholar 

  42. Keilis‐Borok VI (1957) Investigation of the mechanism of earthquakes. Tr Inst Geofis Akad Nauk, SSSR 40 (in Russian). (1960) Sov Res Geophys Ser 4 (Engl transl)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kostrov BV (1964) Self‐similar problems of propagation of shear cracks. J Appl Math Mech 28:1077–1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kostrov BV (1974) Seismic moment and energy of earthquakes and seismic flow of rock. Izv Earth Phys 1:23–40

    Google Scholar 

  45. Kostrov B, Das S (1988) Principles of Earthquake Source Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  46. Madariaga R (1976) Dynamics of an expanding circular fault. Bull Seism Soc Am 66:639–666

    Google Scholar 

  47. Madariaga R (1977) High frequency radiation from crack (stress drop) models of earthquake fauting. Geophys J R Astr Soc 51:625–651

    Google Scholar 

  48. Madariaga R (1978) The dynamic field of Kaskell's rectangular dislocation fault model. Bull Seismol Soc Am 68:869–887

    Google Scholar 

  49. Madariaga R (1979) On the relation between seismic moment and stress drop in the presence of stress and strength heterogeneity. J Geophys Res 84:2243–2250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Mai PM, Beroza GC (2000) Source‐scaling properties from finite‐fault rupture models. Bull Seis Soc Am 90(3):604–615. http://www.seismo.ethz.ch/staff/martin/papers/BSSA00scalingRP.pdf

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Mai PM, Beroza GC (2002) A spatial random‐field model to characterize complexity in earthquake slip. J Geophys Res 107:2308. doi:10.1029/2001JB000588. http://www.seismo.ethz.ch/staff/martin/papers/JGR02MaiSlipComplex.pdf

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Mayeda K, Walker WR (1996) Moment, energy, stress drop, and source spectra of western United States earthquakes from regional coda envelopes. J Geophys Res 101:11195–11208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. McGarr A (1999) On relating apparent stress to the stress causing earthquake fault slip. J Geophys Res 104:3003–3011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. McGarr A, Fletcher JB (2003) Maximum Slip in Earthquake Fault Zones, Apparent Stress, and Stick-Slip Friction. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93:2355–2362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Ohnaka M (2003) A constitutive scaling law and a unified comprehension for frictional slip failure, shear fracture of intact rock, and earthquake rupture. J Geophys Res 108:B2080. doi:10.1029/2000JB000123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Ohnaka M, Shen L-F (1999) Scaling of the shear rupture process from nucleation to dynamic propagation: Implications of geometric irregularity of the rupturing surfaces. J Geophys Res 104:817–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Olsen KB, Madariaga R, Archuleta RJ (1997) Three‐dimensional dynamic simulation of the 1992 Landers Earthquake. Science 278:834–838

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Orowan E (1960) Mechanism of seismic faulting. Geol Soc Am Memoir 79:323–345

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Prieto GA, Shearer PM, Vernon FL, Kilb D (2004) Earthquake source scaling and self‐similarity estimation from stacking P and S spectra. J Geophys Res 109:B08310. doi 10.1029/2004JB003084. http://pangea.stanford.edu/~gprieto/publication/scaling.pdf

  60. Rice JR (1980) The mechanics of earthquake rupture. In: Dziewonski AM, Boschi E (eds) Physics of the Earth's Interior. Proceedings of the International School of Physics “Enrico Fermi”, Course 78, 1979, pp 555–569. North Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  61. Rivera L, Kanamori H (2005) Representations of the radiated energy in earthquakes. Geophy J Int 162:148–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Richards PG (1973) The dynamic field of a growing plane elliptical shear crack. Int J Solids Struct 9:843–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Richardson E, Jordan TH (2002) Seismicity in deep gold mines of South Africa: Implications for tectonic earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92:1766–1782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Ripperger J, Mai PM (2004) Fast computation of static stress changes on 2D faults from final slip distributions. Geophys Res Let 31:L18610. doi:10.1029/2004GL0594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Sato T, Hirasawa T (1973) Body wave spectra from propagating shear cracks. J Phys Earth 21:415–431

    Google Scholar 

  66. Savage JC (1974) Relation of corner frequency to fault dimensions. J Geophys Res 77:3788–3795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Scholz CH (2002) The mechanics of earthquakes and faulting. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  68. Shearer PM, Prieto GA, Hauksson E (2006) Comprehensive analysis of earthquake source spectra in southern California. J Geophys Res, 111, B06303, doi:10.1029/2005JB003979. http://pangea.stanford.edu/~gprieto/publication/scsn_spectra.pdf

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Singh SK, Ordaz M (1994) Seismic energy release in Mexican subduction zone earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84:1533–1550

    Google Scholar 

  70. Sneddon IN (1951) Fourier Transforms. McGraw‐Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  71. Spudich P, Frazer LN (1984) Use of ray theory to calculate high‐frequency radiation from earthquake sources having spatially variable rupture velocity and stress drop. Bull Seismol Soc Am 74:2061–2082

    Google Scholar 

  72. Vassiliou MS, Kanamori H (1982) The energy released in earthquakes. Bull Seism Soc Am 72:371–387

    Google Scholar 

  73. Wyss M, Brune JN (1968) Seismic moment, stress, and source dimensions for earthquakes in the California‐Nevada region. J Geophys Res 73:4681–4684

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was partially funded by the SEISMULATORS contract with ANR under program Catastrophes Telluriques et Tsunamis, and by the Research training network SPICE of the 7th PCRD of the European Union. I am deeply indebted to Luis Rivera, Martin Mai and Art McGarr for their careful and patient review of an initial version of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag

About this entry

Cite this entry

Madariaga, R. (2011). Earthquake Scaling Laws. In: Meyers, R. (eds) Extreme Environmental Events. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7695-6_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics