Skip to main content

Adjudicative Competence

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Adolescence

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 2,050.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Annie E. Casey Foundation. (2008). 2008 Kids count data book: A road map for juvenile justice reform. Baltimore: Annie E. Casey Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartzokis, G., Beckson, M., Lu, P., et al. (2001). Age-related changes in frontal and temporal lobe volumes in men: A magnetic resonance imaging study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 58 (5), 561–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnie, R., & Grisso, T. (2000). Adjudicative competence and youthful offenders. In T. Grisso & R. Schwartz (Eds.), Youth on trial: A developmental perspective on juvenile justice (pp. 73–103). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • California Penal Code §1170.17 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • California Welfare and Institutions Code §707 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2007). Effects on violence of laws and policies facilitating the transfer of youth from the juvenile to the adult justice system: A report on recommendations of the task force on community preventive services. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 56(RR-9), available at www.cdc.gov/mmwR/pdf/rr/rr5609.pdf (accessed March 14, 10).

  • Deitch, M., Barstow, A., Lukens, L., & Reyna, R. (2009). From time out to hard time: Young children in the adult criminal justice system. Austin: The University of Texas at Austin, LBJ School of Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drope v. Missouri, 420 U.S. 162 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dusky v. U.S., 352 U.S. 402 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagan, J., Frost, M., & Vivona, T. S. (1989). Youth in prisons and training schools: Perceptions and consequences of the treatment – Custody dichotomy. 40 Juvenile and Family Court J.1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ficke, S. L., Hart, K. J., & Deardorff, P. A. (2006). The performance of incarcerated juveniles on the MacCAT-CA. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 34, 360–373.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Galvan, A., Hare, T., Voss, H., Glover, G., & Casey, B. J. (2007). Risk-taking and the adolescent brain: Who is at risk? Developmental Science, 10, F8–F14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, M., & Steinberg, L. (2005). Peer influence on risk-taking, risk preference, and risky decision-making in adolescence and adulthood: An experimental study. Developmental Psychology, 41, 625–635.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gogtay, N., Giedd, J., Lusk, L., et al. (2004). Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101 (21), 8174–8179.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grisso, T. (2004). Double jeopardy: Adolescent offenders with mental disorders. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grisso, T., Steinberg, L., Woolard, J., et al. (2003). Juveniles’ competence to stand trial: A comparison of adolescents’ and adults’ capacities as trial defendants. Law and Human Behavior, 27 (4), 333–363.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoge, S. K., Bonnie, R. J., Poythress, N., Monahan, J., Eisenberg, M., & Feucht-Haviar, T. (1997). The MacArthur Adjudicative Competence Study: Development and validation of a research instrument. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 141–179.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • In re Gault, 371 U.S. 1 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson v. Indiana, 406 U.S. 715 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. M. (2006). Juvenile competency statues: A model for state legislation. Indiana Law Journal, 81, 1067–1095.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kambam, P., & Thompson, C. (2009). The development of decision-making capacities in children and adolescents: Psychological and neurological perspectives and their implications for juvenile defendants. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 27 (2), 173–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent v. United States, 383 U.S. 541 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laboratory of Community Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School. (1973). Competency to stand trial and mental illness. Rockville: Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeiver v. Pennsylvania, 403 U.S. 528 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, T. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100 (4), 674–701.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, R., Robertson, H., Johnson, W., & Jensen, G. (1988). A companion of instruments for assessing competency to stand trial. Law and Human Behavior, 2, 313–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto, R., Greenstein, J., Johnson, M., & Friedman, R. (1992). Prevalence of mental disorders among youth in the juvenile justice system. In J. Cocozza (Ed.), Responding to the mental health needs of youth in the juvenile system (pp. 7–48). Seattle: National Coalition for the Mentally Ill in the Criminal Justice System.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, E. (2000). Criminal responsibility in adolescence: Lessons from developmental psychology. In T. Grisso & R. Schwartz (Eds.), Youth on trial: A developmental perspective on juvenile justice (pp. 291–324). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, E. S., Reppucci, N. D., & Woolard, J. L. (1995). Evaluation adolescent decision making in legal contexts. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 221–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowell, E., Mattson, S., Thompson, P., Jernigan, T., Riley, E., & Toga, A. (2001). Mapping continued brain growth and gray matter density reduction in dorsal frontal cortex: Inverse relationships during post-adolescent brain maturation. The Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 8819–8829.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sowell, E., Peterson, B., Thompson, P., Welcome, S., Henkenius, A., & Toga, A. (2003). Mapping cortical change across the human life span. Nature Neuroscience, 6 (3), 309–315.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, A. (1999). Delinquency cases waived to criminal court, 1987–1996. Fact sheet. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L. (2009). Adolescent development and juvenile justice. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 47–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L., & Cauffman, E. (1996). Maturity of judgment in adolescence: Psychosocial factors in adolescent decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 249–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viljoen, J., & Grisso, T. (2007). Prospects for remediating juveniles’ adjudicative incompetence. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 13 (2), 87–114.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Eric Bender .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Bender, H.E., Kambam, P., Thompson, C. (2011). Adjudicative Competence. In: Levesque, R.J.R. (eds) Encyclopedia of Adolescence. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1695-2_245

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1695-2_245

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-1694-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-1695-2

  • eBook Packages: Behavioral Science

Publish with us

Policies and ethics