Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science

2013 Edition
| Editors: Saul I. Gass, Michael C. Fu

Industrial Applications

  • Jaya Singhal
  • Leonard Fortuin
  • Paul van Beek
  • Luk Van Wassenhove
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1153-7_451

Introduction

Although this article is based largely on some of the authors’ experiences and views of European OR/MS, it is of direct importance to the worldwide OR/MS community. The field is better known in Europe as Operational Research or OR, and it occupies itself with quantitative methods for the analysis and solution of management problems. Its origins lie in military organizations during World War II: first the Royal Air Force (U.K.) preparing for the Battle of Britain and later on the U.S. Navy fighting German U-Boote (submarines). After the war, there was a general feeling that OR/MS could also be helpful to managers in industry, government, public services, and financial institutions. The logic was obvious: industrial activities such as production planning, inventory control, and physical distribution were quite suitable for model building and other forms of abstraction that lead to challenging mathematical problems, and trained OR workers (analysts) were available. But soon...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Ackoff, R. L. (1979). The future of OR is past. Journal of Operational Research Society, 30, 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell, P. (1985). Successful operational research in Canada. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Operational Research Society.Google Scholar
  3. Corbett, C., & van Wassenhove, L. (1993). The natural drift: What happened to operations research? Operations Research, 41, 625–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Davenport, T. (2006). Competing on analytics. Harvard Business Review, 84, 98–107.Google Scholar
  5. Fortuin, L., & Korsten, A. (1988). Quantitative methods in the field: Two case studies. European Journal of Operational Research, 37, 187–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fortuin, L., & Lootsma, F. (1985). Future directions in operations research. In A. H. G. Rinnooy Kan (Ed.), New challenges for management research. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  7. Fortuin, L., van Beek, P., & Van Wassenhove, L. (1992). Operational research can do more for managers than they think! OR Insight, 5(1), 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fortuin, L., & Zijlstra, M. (1989). Operational research in practice: Experiences of an OR group in industry. European Journal of Operational Research, 41, 108–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harpell, J., Lane, M., & Mansour, A. (1989). Operations research in practice: A longitudinal study. Interfaces, 19, 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Liberatore, M., & Luo, W. (2010). The analytics movement: Implications for operations research. Interfaces, 40, 313–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lootsma, F. (1991). Perspectives on operations research in long-term planning. European Journal of Operational Research, 50, 76–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rinnooy Kan, A. H. G. (1989). The future of OR is bright. European Journal of Operational Research, 38, 282–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sodhi, M., & Tang, C. (2008). The OR/MS ecosystem: Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. Operations Research, 56, 267–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jaya Singhal
    • 1
  • Leonard Fortuin
    • 2
  • Paul van Beek
    • 3
  • Luk Van Wassenhove
    • 4
  1. 1.Merrick School of BusinessUniversity of BaltimoreBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Eindhoven University of TechnologyEindhovenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Wageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands
  4. 4.INSEADFontainebleauFrance