Vehicle Detection, Tightly Coupled LIDAR and Computer Vision Integration for. Table 1 Performance comparison of existing sensor technologies used in ITS [14]
From: Vehicle Detection , Tightly Coupled LIDAR and Computer Vision Integration for
Sensor technology | Advantage | Disadvantage |
---|---|---|
LIDAR | Detect distance and angle with high accuracy | High cost |
Low data processing requirement | Limited detection range | |
Operational in fog and rain | Difficult to classify the object | |
Radar | Direct measurement of speed or distance | Relatively low precision |
Compact size | Limited field of view | |
Low data processing requirement | May have identification problem in multilane applications | |
Medium cost | ||
Video camera | Provide real-time image of traffic | High requirement for data processing and storage |
Low cost | ||
Multiple lanes observed | Different algorithms required for day- and nighttime | |
No traffic interruption for installation and repair | ||
Large field of view | Susceptible to atmospheric obscurants and weather change | |
Infrared camera | Day and night operation | High requirement for data processing |
Operational in fog | Susceptible to weather change | |
Inductive loop detector | Low cost per unit | Installation and maintenance require traffic disruption |
Large experience base | Easily damaged |