Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology

2012 Edition
| Editors: Robert A. Meyers

Underground Cable Systems

  • Yamille Del Valle
  • Nigel Hampton
  • Josh Perkel
  • Caryn Riley
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0851-3_758

Definition of the Subject

Underground cables have been used from the earliest time as integral parts of the power distribution and transmission system. Compared to their overhead analogues, they have been long regarded as the most critical of components due in part to their high total installed cost, their unique ampacity requirements, and the complexity of their installation. Thus, even from the very first technical papers, the sustainability, through reliability and longevity, has been of paramount importance. This contribution addresses the focus on sustainability today while maintaining a linkage to the lessons that have been already learned.

Introduction

Almost all electric power utilities distribute a portion of the electric energy they sell via underground cable systems . Collectively, these systems form a vast, interlinked, and valuable infrastructure. Estimates for the USA indicate that underground cables represent 15–20% of installed distribution system capacity. This...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Bibliography

  1. 1.
    Moore GF (1997) Electrical cables handbook. Blackwell Science, San Diego. ISBN 0 632 04075 0Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Densley J (1995) Ageing and diagnostics in extruded insulations for power cables. In: IEEE 5th international conference on conduction and breakdown in solid dielectrics, IEEE publication 95CH3476-9, pp 1–15Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fothergill JC, Hampton RN (2004) Polymer insulated cable. In: Haddad A, Warne D (eds) Advances in high voltage engineering. IEE, London, pp 477–507, Chapter 10. ISBN 0 85296 158 8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Abernethy RB (1996) The new Weibull handbook, 2nd edn. Robert B. Abernethy, North Palm Beach. ISBN 0965306208Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hampton RN (2008) Some of the considerations for materials operating under High Voltage Direct Current Stresses. IEEE Electrical Insulation Magazine 24(1):5–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Leijon M (1999) Novel concept in high voltage generation: PowerformerTM. IEE Conference Publication, v5, n467, 1999. In: Proceedings of the 1999, 11th International symposium on “High Voltage Engineering”, 23–27 Aug 1999, London, UK, p 5.379.S5-5.382.P5, IEE, ISSN: 0537–9989 IECPB4 ISBN: 0-85296-719-5Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jenkins N (2002) Power Engineering Journal 16(3):90–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Karlstrand J, Sunnegardh P, Zenger W, Ghafurian R, Boggia R (2002) Water-cooled 345 kV solid-dielectric cable system, Cigré paper 21–111Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Halvarsson P, Karlstrand J, Larsson D, Larsson M, Reinholdsdóttir K, Sigurõsson E (2002) A novel approach to long buried AC transmission system, Cigré paper 21–201Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bartnikas R, Eichhorn RM (eds) (1983) Engineering dielectrics, vol IIA, Electrical properties of solid insulation, Philadelphia, ASTM-STP 783Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Diagnostic Testing of Underground Cable Systems (Cable Diagnostic Focused Initiative) DOE Award No. DE-FC02-04CH11237, December 2010Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dissado LA, Fothergill JC (1992) Electrical degradation and breakdown in polymers. In: Peter Peregrinuns for the IEE, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brincourt T, Regaudie V (1999) Evaluation of different diagnostic methods for the French underground MV network. In: JICABLE’99, Versailles, p 451Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Peschke E, Schroth R, Olshausen R (1995) Extension of XLPE cables to 500 kV based on progress in technology. In: JICABLE’95, Montreal, pp 6–10Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Griffiths CL, Betteridge S, Hampton RN (1998) Thermoelectric ageing of cable grade XLPE in dry conditions. Conduction and breakdown in solid dielectrics ICSD '98. Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE 6th international conference, pp 279–282, doi:10.1109/ICSD.1998.709279Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Coppard RW, Bowman J, Dissado LA, Roland SM, Rakowski RT (1990) The effect of aluminium inclusions on the dielectric breakdown strength of polyethylene. J Appl Phys 23:1554–1561Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Antoniscki JR, Nilsson U, Gubanski SM (1997) The effect of metal inclusions on the breakdown strength of XLPE cables. In: CEIDP 1997, Minneapolis, pp 283–286Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hagen ST, Ildstad E (1993) Reduction of AC breakdown strength due to particle inclusions in XLPE cable insulation. In: Conference on power cables and accessories 10 kV–500 kV, London, pp 165–168Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Blodgett RB (1962) Influence of absorbed water and temperature on tan delta and dielectric constant of oil-impregnated paper insulation. Trans AIEE 81:93–100Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hartlein RA, Hampton RN, Perkel J (2008) Some considerations on the selection of optimum location, timing, and technique, for diagnostic tests. In: IEEE Power Engineering Society (PES) general meeting panel session, PittsburgGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Steennis EF (1989) Water treeing: the behaviour of water trees in extruded cable insulation. ISBN 90-353-1022-5, Kema, pp 132–133Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gregory B, Griffiths CL, Hampton RN and Mainwaring SP (2000) A probabilistic design method for polymeric structures to operate at high electrical stress. In: 8th international conference on dielectric materials, measurements and application, IEE Conference Publication no 473, pp 419–424Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ogawa K, Kosugi T, Kato N, Kawawata Y (1990) The worlds first use of 500 kV XLPE insulated aluminium sheathed power cables at the Shimogo and Imaichi power stations. IEEE Trans Power Delivery 5(1):26–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    International Energy Agency. www.iea.org
  25. 25.
    Gorham and Partners (1995) Undergrounding – A success story already in Europe – Potentially worldwide. Report to ICF Congress 1995Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Campbell A (2003) Undergrounding HV and EHV – window of opportunity opens. In: ICF Congress 2003, St Petersburg, pp 169–193Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hampton RN (2005) Electrical insulation systems for energy technology and clean environment. In: Nordic insulation symposium (NORDIS), Trondheim, June 2005Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hampton RN, Olearczyk M, Perkel J, Weisenfeld N (2010) Cable fleet management. IEEE Power and Engineering, Nov 2010Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Perkel J, Hernández JC, Hampton RN, Drapeau JF, Densley (2011) Challenges associated with the interpretation of dielectric loss data from power cable system measurements. In: International conference on insulated power cables JICABLE11, Versailles France, June 2011, C.4.5Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Drapeau J-F, Cantin B, Hampton N, Perkel J (2011) Dielectric loss characterization of hydro-quebec medium voltage (MV) submarine cables – phase 1. In: International conference on insulated power cables JICABLE11, Versailles France, June 2011, Paper A.7.6Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fletcher CL, Perkel J, Hampton RN, Hernandez JC, Hesse J, Pearman MG, Wall CT, Zenger W (2011) First practical utility implementation of monitored withstand diagnostics in the USA. In: International conference on insulated power cables JICABLE11, Versailles France, June 2011, Paper A.10.2Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Parker T, Hampton RN (2011) Impact of filled-strand conductor on connector temperature for medium voltage joints. In: International conference on insulated power cables JICABLE11, Versailles France, June 2011, Paper C.1.5Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yamille Del Valle
    • 1
  • Nigel Hampton
    • 1
  • Josh Perkel
    • 1
  • Caryn Riley
    • 1
  1. 1.National Electric Energy Test Research and Application Centre (NEETRAC)Forest ParkUSA