Geochemical Modeling in Environmental and Geological Studies
Definition of the Subject and Its Importance
Geochemical modeling uses a set of mathematical expressions thought to represent chemical and transport processes in a particular geological system. The predictions of the model are partially observable or experimentally verifiable. Geochemical modeling has found applications in studies of chemical reactions in geological and environmental systems because of its utilities for synthesis of data, testing scenarios, and predicting long-term consequences of chemical reactions.
Geochemical modeling is a powerful and indispensable tool for research and investigations of environmental sustainability science and technology. It allows quantitative evaluation of complex processes that often have feedback loops and it can predict the extent and consequences of geochemical reactions in the order of thousands to tens of thousands of years, beyond the range of laboratory experiments.
An excellent example of the utility of geochemical modeling...
The writing of this entry was also made possible with continued financial support from the US National Science Foundation (EAR0423971, EAR0509775, EAR 0809903) and the US Department of Energy (DE-FG26-04NT42125, DE-FE0004381). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material, however, are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the US Government or any agency thereof.
- 5.Wolery TJ (1992) EQ3/6, A software package for geochemical modeling of aqueous systems: package overview and installation guide (Version 7.0). URCL-MA-110662-PT-I, University of California/Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, California/Livermore, p 41Google Scholar
- 6.Kharaka YK et al (1988) SOLMINEQ.88: a computer program for geochemical modeling of water-rock interactions. Water-resources investigations report 88–4227, US Geological SurveyGoogle Scholar
- 7.Parkhurst DL, Appello AAJ (1999) User’s guide to PHREEQC (Version 2)-a computer program for speciation, batch-reaction, one dimensional transport, and inverse geochemical modeling. Water-resource investigation report, US Geological Survey, p 312Google Scholar
- 8.Allison JD, Brown DS, Novo-Gradac KJ (1991) MINTEQA2/PRODEFA2, a geochemical assessment model for environmental systems, Version 3.0 user’s manualGoogle Scholar
- 9.Zhu C (2009) Geochemical modeling of reaction paths and geochemical reaction networks. In: Oelkers EH, Schott J (eds) Thermodynamics and kinetics of water-rock interaction. Mineralogical Society of America, Washington, pp 533–569Google Scholar
- 10.Johnson JW, Lundeen SR (1994) GEMBOCHS thermodynamic data files for use with the EQ3/6 software package. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, p 99Google Scholar
- 12.Helgeson HC et al (1978) Summary and critique of the thermodynamic properties of rock forming minerals. Am J Sci 278A:569–592Google Scholar
- 13.Wagman DD et al (1982) The NBS tables of chemical thermodynamic properties – selected values for inorganic and C-1 and C-2 organic-substances in SI units. J Phys Chem Ref Data 11(Supplement 2):392Google Scholar
- 15.Berman RG (1990) Mixing properties of Ca-Mg-Fe-Mn garnets. Am Mineral 75:328–344Google Scholar
- 18.Robie RA, Hemingway BS (1995) Thermodynamic properties of minerals and related substances at 298.15 K and 1 bar (105pascals) pressure and at higher temperatures. US Geological Survey Bulletin 2131, p 456Google Scholar
- 19.Grenthe I et al (1992) The chemical thermodynamics of uranium. Elsevier, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 20.Helgeson HC, Kirkham DH, Flowers GC (1981) Theoretical prediction of the thermodynamic behavior of aqueous electrolytes at high pressures and temperatures. IV. Calculation of activity coefficients, osmotic coefficients, and apparent molal and standard and relative partial molal properties to 600oC and 5 kb. Am J Sci 281:1249–1516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Shock EL et al (1992) Calculation of thermodynamic and transport properties of aqueous species at high pressures and temperatures. Effective electrostatic radii, dissociation constants and standard partial molal properties to 1000°C and 5 kb. J Chem Soc London, Faraday Trans 88:803–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Nordstrom DK, Munoz JL (1994) Geochemical thermodynamics, 2nd edn. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- 29.Plummer LN et al (1988) A computer program incorporating Pitzer’s equations for calculation of geochemical reactions in brines. Water resources investigations report 88–4153, US Geological Survey, p 310Google Scholar
- 30.Xu T et al (2004) TOUGHREACT user’s guide: a simulation program for non-isothermal multiphase reactive geochemical transport in variably saturated geologic media (V1.2). Paper LBNL-55460. Lawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
- 31.Wolery T et al (2004) Pitzer database development: description of the Pitzer geochemical thermodynamic database data0.ypf. Appendix I in In-Drift precipitates/salts model (P. Mariner) report ANL-EBS-MD-000045 REV 02. Bechtel SAIC Company, Las VegasGoogle Scholar
- 33.Liu FY et al (2010) Antimony speciation and contamination of waters in Xikuangshan Sb mining and smelting area, China. Environ Geochem Health. doi:10.1007/s10653-010-9284-zGoogle Scholar
- 35.Stumm W, Morgan JJ (1996) Aquatic chemistry, chemical equilibria and rates in natural waters. Wiley, New York, p 1022Google Scholar
- 36.Stumm W (1992) Chemistry of solid-water interfaces: processes at the mineral-water and particle-water interface in natural systems, 1st edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 37.Dzombak DD, Morel FMM (1990) Surface complex modeling: hydrous ferric oxide. Wiley, New York, 393Google Scholar
- 40.Helgeson HC (1979) Mass transfer among minerals and hydrothermal solutions. In: Barnes HL (ed) Geochemistry of hydrothermal ore deposits. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 568–610Google Scholar
- 41.Anderson GM, Crerar DA (1993) Thermodynamics in geochemistry: the equilibrium model. Oxford University Press, New York, 588Google Scholar
- 48.Liu FY et al (2010) Coupled reactive transport modeling of CO2 Sequestration in the Mt. Simon sandstone formation, Midwest U.S.A. Int J Greenh Gas Con 5:294–307Google Scholar
- 51.Anderson TT, Vrionis HA, Ortiz-Bernard I, Resch CT, Long PE, Dayvault R, Karp K, Marutzky S, Metzler DR, Peacock A, White DC, Lowe M, Lovley DR (2003) Stimulating the in situ activity Geobacter species to remove uranium from the groundwater of a uranium-contaminated aquifer. Appl Environ Microb 69:5884–5891CrossRefGoogle Scholar