Skip to main content

Anesthesia Challenges in Interventional Oncology

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 1503 Accesses

Abstract

Better technology and imaging has allowed image-guided cancer therapy once only performed in the traditional operating room to be performed as minimally invasive procedures in other locales. The complexity of the procedures, the level of sedation required, and the comorbidities of the patients have created a need for the anesthesia care provider’s presence. This chapter discusses the role and challenges of the anesthesiologist in interventional oncology for procedures outside the traditional operating room.

Technological advancement and movement toward closed body, minimally invasive surgery has moved interventional oncology procedures, once only performed in the operating room (OR), to nontraditional locales. Historically, patient sedation in the interventional operating room has been performed under the supervision of the interventional physician. Complex procedures and the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organization (JCAHO) regulations led to the anesthesiology and interventional physicians working more closely together [1]. Despite the apparent simplicity of this new relationship, working outside the main operating room can be very complex. In order for the anesthesiologist to guarantee the same level of safety for the patient, the anesthesiologist must be familiar with the procedure, the location, and the potential complications. The interventionalist must be familiar with the practice guidelines and standard of anesthesia care. This chapter provides the extensive list of issues that must be addressed before the anesthesia image-guided oncology team begins patient care as well as the unique anesthetic considerations of patients undergoing image-guided cancer therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   269.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Procedure for Intravenous Conscious Sedation. Comprehensive Accreditation Manual for Hospitals: The Official Handbook. The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations.

    Google Scholar 

  2. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Sedation and Analgesia by Non-Anesthesiologists. Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology. 2002;96:1004–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Meridy HW. Criteria for selecting of ambulatory surgical patients and guidelines. Anesth Analg. 1982;61:921–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Natof HE. Ambulatory surgery: patients with pre-existing medical problems. Ill Med J. 1984;166:101.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Federated Ambulatory Surgery Association. FASA special study 1. Alexandria: FASA; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chung F, Mezei G, Tong D. Pre-existing medical conditions as predictors of adverse events in day-case surgery. Br J Anaesth. 1999;83:262–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chung F, Mezei G. Factors contributing to a prolonged stay after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg. 1999;6:1352–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lichtor JL. Anesthesia for ambulatory surgery. In: Barash PG, Cullen BF, Stoelting RK, editors. Clinical anesthesia. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lee TH. Reducing cardiac risk in noncardiac surgery. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1838–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fleischer LA, Beckman JA, Brown KA, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines on preoperative cardiovascular evaluation for noncardiac surgery. Circulation. 2007;116:418–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schouten O, Jeroen JB, Poldermans D, et al. Assessment of cardiac risk before noncardiac surgery. Heart. 2006;92:1866–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Auerbach A, Goldman L. Assessing and reducing the cardiac risk of noncardiac surgery. Circulation. 2006;113:1361–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Devereaux PJ, Yang H, Guyatt GH, et al. Rationale, design, and organization of the perioperative ischemic evaluation (POISE) trail; a randomized controlled trial of metoprolol versus placebo in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Am Heart J. 2006;152:223–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lindenauer PK, Pekow P, Wang K, et al. Perioperative beta-blockade therapy and mortality after noncardiac surgery. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:349–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Newsome LT, Weller RS, Gerancher JC, et al. Coronary artery stents: II. Perioperative considerations and management. Anesth Analg. 2008;107:570–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Warner DO. Preventing postoperative pulmonary complications: the role of the anesthesiologist. Anesthesiology. 2000;92:1467–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. McAlister FA, Khan NA, Straus SE, et al. Accuracy of preoperative assessment in predicting pulmonary risk after nonthoracic surgery. Am J Resp Crit Care Med. 2003;167:741–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kroenke K, Lawrence VA, Theroux JF, et al. Postoperative complications after thoracic and major abdominal surgery in patients with and without obstructive lung disease. Chest. 1993;104:1445–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kearney DJ, Lee TH, Reilly JJ, et al. Assessment of operative risk in patients undergoing lung resection: importance of predicted pulmonary function. Chest. 1994;105:753–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Stroh KP, Redline S. Recognition of obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Resp Crit Care Med. 1996;154:279–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ortego LD, Carnevali-Ruiz D, Gallego ED. Sleep apnea and the risk for perioperative myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med. 1993;119:953.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gupta RM, Parvizi J, Hanssen AD, et al. Postoperative complications in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome undergoing hip or knee replacement. Mayo Clin Proc. 2001;76:897–905.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gross JB, Bachenberg KL, Benumof JL, et al. Practice guidelines for the perioperative management of patients with sleep apnea. Anesthesiology. 2006;104:1081–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lin CC. Effect of CPAP on ventilatory drive in normocapnic and hypercapnic patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Eur Respir J. 1994;7:2005–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Loadsman JA, Hillman DR. Anesthesia and sleep apnea. Br J Anaesth. 2001;86:254–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fattowich G. Natural history and prognosis of hepatitis B. Semin Liver Dis. 2003;23:47–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Standards for Basic Anesthetic Monitoring (amended by ASA House of Delegates Oct 2010). www.asahq.org/publicationsAndServices/standards/02.PDF. Accessed October 2004.

  28. Philip BK. Sedation with propofol: a new ASA statement. ASA Newsl. 2005;69:29–30.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Fredman B, Lahav M, Zohar E, et al. The effect of midazolam premedication on mental and psychomotor recovery in geriatric patients undergoing brief surgical procedures. Anesth Analg. 1999;89:1161–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Katoh T, Kobayashi S, Suzuki A, et al. The effect of fentanyl on sevoflurane requirements for somatic and sympathetic responses to surgical incision. Anesthesiology. 1999;90:398–405.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ebert TJ, Muzi M, Lopatka CW. Neurocirculatory responses to sevoflurane in humans. A comparison to desflurane. Anesthesiology. 1995;83:88–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Merkel G, Eger EI. A comparative effect of halothane and halopropane anesthesia. Introducing method for determining equipotency. Anesthesiology. 1963;24:346–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Eger EI, Bowland T, Ionescu P, et al. Recovery and kinetic characteristics of desflurane and sevoflurane in volunteers after 8 hour exposure, including kinetics of degradation products. Anesthesiology. 1997;87:517–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Habre W, Petak F, Sly PD, et al. Protective effects of volatile agents against methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction in rats. Anesthesiology. 2001;94:348–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tang J, White PF, Wender RH, et al. Fast-track office based anesthesia: a comparison of propofol versus desflurane with antiemetic prophylaxis in spontaneously breathing patients. Anesth Analg. 2001;92:95–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ashworth J, Smith I. Comparison of desflurane with isoflurane or propofol in spontaneously breathing ambulatory patients. Anesth Analg. 1998;87:312–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Tang J, Chen L, White PF, et al. Recovery profile, costs, and patient satisfaction with propofol and sevoflurane for fast-track office-based anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1999;91:253–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Eshima RW, Maurer A, King T, et al. Comparison of airway responses during desflurane and sevoflurane administration via a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) for maintenance of anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2003;96:701–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sundman E, Witt H, Sandin R, et al. Pharyngeal function and airway protection during sub hypnotic concentrations of propofol, isoflurane, and sevoflurane. Volunteers examined by pharyngeal videoradiography and simultaneous manometry. Anesthesiology. 2001;95:1125–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Mckay RE, Large MJ, Balea MC, et al. Airway reflexes return more rapidly after desflurane anesthesia than after sevoflurane anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2005;100:697–700.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Dwyer R, Bennett HL, Eger EI, et al. Effects of isoflurane and nitrous oxide in sub anesthetic concentrations on memory and responsiveness in volunteers. Anesthesiology. 1992;77:888–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Eger EI, et al. The pharmacology of inhaled anesthetics. Chicago: Healthcare Press; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Chortkoff BS, Eger EI, Crankshaw DP, et al. Concentrations of desflurane and propofol that suppress response to command in humans. Anesth Analg. 1995;81:737–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Philip BK, Kallar SK, Bogetz MS, et al. A multicenter comparison of maintenance and recovery with sevoflurane or isoflurane for adult ambulatory anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1997;83:314–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Ebert TJ, Robinson BJ, Uhrich TD, et al. Recovery from sevoflurane anesthesia. A comparison to isoflurane and propofol anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1998;89:1524–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Strum EM, Szenohradszki J, Kaufman WA, et al. Emergence and recovery characteristics of desflurane versus sevoflurane in morbidly obese adult surgical patients: a prospective, randomized study. Anesth Analg. 2004;99:1848–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Dahmani S, Dupont H, Mantz J, et al. Predictive factors of early morphine requirements in the post – anesthesia care unit. Br J Anesth. 2001;87:385–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Metzner J, Posner KL, Domino KB, et al. The risk and safety of anesthesia at remote locations: the US closed claims analysis. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009;22:502–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Onik G, Onik C, Medary I, et al. Life-threatening hypertensive crises in two patients undergoing hepatic radiofrequency ablation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181:495–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Chini EN, Brown MJ, Farrell MA, et al. Hypertensive crisis in a patient undergoing percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of an adrenal mass under general anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2004;99:1867–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Venkatesan AM, Locklin J, Lai EW, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of metastatic pheochromocytoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;20:1483–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Levy JH. Anaphylactic reactions in anesthesia and intensive care. 2nd ed. Stoneham: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Stark BJ, Sullivan TJ. Biphasic and protracted anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1986;78:76–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary Fischer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Fischer, M., Kotin, A. (2013). Anesthesia Challenges in Interventional Oncology. In: Dupuy, D., Fong, Y., McMullen, W. (eds) Image-Guided Cancer Therapy. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0751-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0751-6_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-0750-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-0751-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics