Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology

2014 Edition
| Editors: Claire Smith

Epigraphy, Latin: Early Through Late Republican

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_928

Introduction

Roughly in the same period when the last king was expelled from Rome, the Latin epigraphic habit lost its strict dependence on the Etruscan one, which had fostered its development in the preceding centuries. During those same decades, Etruscan epigraphy itself was undergoing major changes, mainly propelled by scribal schools linked with the great sanctuaries, which precisely at this time began to play a crucial role in Etruscan civic life. Latin epigraphy was far from uniform in this early period, with almost every center boasting its own epigraphic habit as part of a strictly local identity. The city of Tibur, which shared many cultural features with the Italic world (although characterizing itself unequivocally as a Latin city), even introduced the typically middle-Italic letter-rotations. The preeminence of Rome in Latin epigraphic culture was a relatively late phenomenon, clearly accelerated by the suppression of the Latin League in 338 BCE, which led to outright Roman...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

References

  1. AE L'Année Épigraphique. Available at: http://www.anneeepigraphique.msh-paris.fr/.
  2. CIL Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum. Available at: http://cil.bbaw.de/cil_en/dateien/forschung.html.
  3. Fortson, B.W. & D.S. Potter. 2011. A fragmentary early republican public inscription from Gabii, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 178: 255-60.Google Scholar
  4. Franchi De Bellis, A. 1997. I cippi prenestini (Pubblicazioni dell'Università di Urbino. Scienze Umane. Serie di linguistica, letteratura, arte, 13). Urbino: Università degli Studi di Urbino.Google Scholar

Further Reading

  1. Lassère, J.-M. 2005. Manuel d’épigraphie latine. Paris: Picard.Google Scholar
  2. Nonnis, D. 2003a. Dotazioni funzionali e luoghi di culto dell'Italia repubblicana. L'apporto della documentazione epigrafica, in O. De Cazanove & J. Scheid (ed.) Sanctuaires et source dans l'antiquité: les sources documentaires et leurs limites dans la description des lieux de culte (Actes de la table-ronde, Naples 2001) (Collection du Centre Jean Bérard 22): 25-54. Naples: Centre Jean Bérard.Google Scholar
  3. Nonnis, D. 2003b. Le implicazioni socio-politiche della produzione e della distribuzione nell'Italia repubblicana. L'apporto della documentazione epigrafica, in C. Zaccagnini (ed.), Mercanti e politica nel mondo antico (Atti del convegno, Roma 2000) (Saggi di storia antica 21): 245-64. Rome: “L’Erma” di Bretschneider.Google Scholar
  4. Panciera, S. 1989-90. Le iscrizioni votive latine. Scienze dell’antichità. Storia, archeologia, antropologia 3: 905-14.Google Scholar
  5. - 1997. L’evergetismo civico nelle iscrizioni latine di età repubblicana, in M. Christol & O. Masson (ed.) Actes du Xe congrès international d'épigraphie grecque et latine, Nîmes 1992 (Série Histoire Ancienne et Médiévale 42): 249-90. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne.Google Scholar
  6. - 1998. Epigrafia. Una voce soppressa. Archeologia Classica 50: 313-30.Google Scholar
  7. Panciera, S. & C. Pietri. (ed.) 1991. Epigrafia: actes du colloque international d'épigraphie latine en mémoire de Attilio Degrassi, Rome 1988 (Collection de l'École Française de Rome 143). Rome: École Française de Rome.Google Scholar
  8. Schmidt, M.G. 2004. Einführung in die lateinische Epigraphik. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
  9. Solin, H. 1999. Epigrafia repubblicana. Bilancio, novità, prospettive, in S. Panciera (ed.) XI Congresso internazionale di epigrafia greca e latina (Roma 1997). Atti: 379-404. Rome: Quasar.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.L’Istituto di Studi sulle civiltà Italiche e del Mediterraneo Antico del Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche di RomaMonterotondoItaly