Skip to main content

Technological Studies in Archaeological Science

  • Reference work entry
Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology
  • 415 Accesses

Introduction

Technological studies are concerned with many of the big questions of archaeology: Who made the objects we find? What materials did ancient people use? Where did they obtain their raw materials, and how did they craft pottery, stone tools, buildings, clothing, and other useful items? How did they communicate technological knowledge to each other, and how and where did they trade raw materials and finished objects? Why did people value certain materials and products over others?

The extent to which scholars can answer these questions depends upon the physical evidence left behind (e.g., pottery kilns, potsherds and broken glass vessels, chert debitage, scraps of preserved textiles), the context of the finds, and the nature of historical information, if any. For example, when dealing with the Roman pottery industry in Italy, France, and Germany, scholars find stamps (Fig. 1) of potters and manufacturers and literary evidence in addition to physical pottery installations for...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 5,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baldia, C.M. & K.A. Jakes. 2007. Toward the classification of colorants in archaeological textiles of eastern North America, in M. Glascock (ed.) Archaeological chemistry ACS symposium series: 15-43. Washington (DC): American Chemical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, R.L. & F.W. Lange. 1991. The ceramic legacy of Anna O. Shephard. Niwot (CO): University Press of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claassen, C.P. 1981. Experimentation with modern materials, in R.A. Gould & M. B. Schiffer (ed.) Modern material culture: 239-246. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, T., R.E. Huges, K.B. Farnsworth, S. Wisseman & M. Hynes. 2005. Tremper Mound, Hopewell catlinite, and PIMA technology. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 30: 189-216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freestone, I. 1991. Looking into glass, in S. Bowman (ed.) Science and the past: 37-56. London: Trustees of the British Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton. E.G. 2008. Adventures in experimental smelting. Expedition 49: 13-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hostetter, E. 1994. Lydian architectural terracottas: a study in tile replication, display and technique(Illinois Classical Studies, Supplemental Monograph 4). Atlanta: Scholars Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, C. 1994. Invention, thought, and process: Strategies in iron tool production, in S. Wisseman & W. Williams (ed.) Ancient technologies and archaeological materials: 59-70. Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingery, D. 1991. Attic pottery gloss technology. Archeomaterials 5: 47-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, J.B. 1997. Traces of the past: unraveling the secrets of archaeology through chemistry. Reading: Perseus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martoglio, P.A. & K.A. Jakes. 1990. Unlocking the secrets of the past: the analysis of archaeological textiles and dyes. Archaeological Chemistry 62: 1123A-1128A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proefke, M., K.L Rinehart, M. Raheel, S.H. Ambrose & S.U. Wisseman. 1992. Probing the mysteries of ancient Egypt: chemical analysis of a Roman period Egyptian mummy. Analytical Chemistry 64: 105A-111A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, P. 1997. Iron technology in East Africa: symbolism, science, and archaeology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackley, M.S. 2010. Is there reliability and validity in portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (PXRF)? The SAA Archaeological Record: 17-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimada, I. 2005. Experimental archaeology, in H.D.G. Mashner & C. Chippindale (ed.) Handbook of archaeological methods, Volume 1: 603-642. Lanham: Altamira.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tite, M.S. 1987. Characterisation of early vitreous materials. Archaeometry 29: 21-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitali, V. J. Darcovich, & W. Williams, 1986. X-ray radiography of a gui vessel in the Krannert Art Museum collection. Journal of the International Institute of Conservation-Canadian Group 10-11: 3-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisseman, S. 2005. True grit: Middle Woodland cooking and pottery production. Illinois Archaeology 17: 189-200.

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Rice, P.M. 1987. Pottery analysis: a sourcebook. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, W.S. 1994. Science in the art museum, in S. Wisseman & W. Williams (ed.) Ancient technologies and archaeological materials: 159-162. Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah U. Wisseman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Wisseman, S.U. (2014). Technological Studies in Archaeological Science. In: Smith, C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_328

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_328

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-0426-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-0465-2

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics