Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology

2014 Edition
| Editors: Claire Smith


Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_284


Ethnoarchaeology is a subdiscipline of anthropology placed in what Binford called actualistic studies (see also the entry on “ Taphonomy: Definition”). Ethnoarchaeology is differentiated from other actualistic studies in that it includes the systematic observation of living societies and from other types of ethnography through its explicit focus on the intention to identify the archaeological – material – implications of human behavior. During the last 40 years, archaeologists have carried out fieldwork in traditional societies to help answer certain questions regarding the interpretation of the archaeological record and to develop and refine analogies. This research strategy has been labeled as ethnoarchaeology, and it transformed in one of the main sources of analogies. Analogy can be broadly defined as the transferal of information from one object or phenomenon to another based on certain relations of compatibility between them. Although the use of analogical reasoning...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Binford, L. 1978. Nunamiut ethnoarchaeology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bird, D. & J. O’Connell. 2006. Behavioral ecology and archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Research 14: 143-88.Google Scholar
  3. David, N & C. Kramer. 2001. Ethnoarchaeology in action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Gallay, A. & E. Huysecom. 1989. Ethnoarchéologie africaine (Documents du Département d’Anthropologie et d’Écologie 14). Genève: Université de Genève.Google Scholar
  5. González Ruibal, A. 2003. La experiencia del otro. Una introducción a la etnoarqueología. Madrid: Editorial Akal.Google Scholar
  6. Gould, R. 1980. Living archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Hernando, A., G. Politis, A. González -Ruibal & E. Beserra Cohelo. 2011. Gender, power and mobility among the Awá-Guajá (Maranhão, Brazil). Journal of Anthropological Research 67(2): 189-211.Google Scholar
  8. Hodder, I. (ed.) 1982. Symbols in actions: ethnoarchaeological studies of material culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Kent, S. 1984. Analyzing activity areas. Alburquerque: University of New Mexico.Google Scholar
  10. O’Connell, J. F. 1987. Alyawara site structure and its archaeological implications. American Antiquity 52: 74-108.Google Scholar
  11. Politis, G. 2004. Tendencias de la etnoarqueologia en América Latina, in G. Politis & R. D. Peretti (ed.) Teoría Arqueológica en América del Sur: 85-117. Olavarría: Serie Teórica INCUAPA.Google Scholar
  12. Ravn, M. 2011. Ethnographic analogy from the Pacific: just as analogy as any other analogy. World Archaeology 43(4): 716-25.Google Scholar
  13. Skibo, J. 2009. Archaeological theory and snake-oil peddling. The role of ethnoarchaeology in archaeology. Ethnoarchaeology 1(1): 27-55.Google Scholar
  14. Roux, V. 2007. Ethnoarchaeology, a non-historical science of reference necessary for interpreting the past. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 14(2): 153-78.Google Scholar
  15. Sillar, B. 2000. Shaping culture: making pots and constructing households: an ethnoarchaeology study of pottery production, trade and use in the Andes (BAR International series 883). Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
  16. Spriggs, M. 2008. Ethnoarchaeological parallels and the denial of history. World Archaeology 40(4): 538-52.Google Scholar
  17. Yellen, J.E. 1977. Archaeological approaches to the present. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Further Reading

  1. Hodder, I. (ed.) 1986 Reading the past: current approaches to interpretation in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Lane, P. 2006. Present to past. Ethnoarchaeology, in C. Tilley, W. Keane, S. Kuechler, M. Rowlands & P. Spyer (ed.) Handbook of material culture: 402-24. London: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  3. Politis, G. 2007. Nukak. Ethnoarchaeology of an Amazonian people (University College London Institute of Archaeology Publications). Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Facultad de Ciencias SocialesCONICET-INCUAPA UNICENBuenos AiresArgentina