Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology

2014 Edition
| Editors: Claire Smith

Agrarian Landscapes: Environmental Archaeological Studies

  • Nicholas BranchEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_2263

Introduction and Definition

Environmental archaeology has grown to be a major subdiscipline of archaeology, which utilizes scientific approaches from many different backgrounds of academia, including geography, geology, biology, physics, and chemistry (Butser 1982; Dincauze 2000; Bell & Walker 2004; O’Connor & Evans 2005). We can therefore define environmental archaeology in archaeology as “the study of the environment and its relationship with people through time”; this has in turn led to the development of distinctive subdivisions of environmental archaeology called geoarchaeology, zooarchaeology, and archaeobotany. Geoarchaeology is concerned with landscape and stratigraphic formation and modification processes and draws mainly on geological, sedimentological, and soil science analytical techniques. Both zooarchaeology and archaeobotany focus not only on human economies and subsistence (diet, health, and nutrition) of both wild and domesticated animals and plants (paleoeconomy) but...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Barker, G. 1985. Prehistoric farming in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bell, M. & M.J.C. Walker. 2004.Late Quaternary environmental change. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
  3. Branch, N.P. 2012. Early-Middle Holocene vegetation history, climate change and human activities at Lago Riane (Ligurian Apennines, NW Italy). Vegetation History and Archaeobotany. doi: 10.1007/s00334-012-0384-9Google Scholar
  4. Branch, N.P., M.G. Canti, P. Clark & C.S.M. Turney. 2005. Environmental archaeology: theoretical and practical approaches. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  5. Branch, N.P., R.A. Kemp, B. Silva, F.M. Meddens, A. Williams, A. Kendall & C. Vivanco Pomacanchari. 2007. Journal of Archaeological Science 34: 1-9.Google Scholar
  6. Butzer, K.W. 1982. Archaeology as human ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Dincauze, D.F. 2000. Environmental archaeology: principles and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Eastwood, W.J., N. Roberts & H.F. Lamb. 1998. Palaeoecological and archaeological evidence for human occupance in southwest Turkey: the Beyşehir occupation phase. Anatolian Studies 48: 69-86.Google Scholar
  9. England, A., W.J. Eastwood, C.N. Roberts, R. Turner & J.F. Haldon. 2008. Historical landscape change in Cappadocia (central Turkey): a palaeoecological investigation of annually laminated sediments from Nar Lake. The Holocene 18: 1229-45.Google Scholar
  10. Fuller, D.Q., L. Qin, Y. Zheng, Z. Zhao, X. Chen, L.A. Hosoya & G.-P. Sun. 2009. The domestication process and domestication rate in rice: spikelet bases from the Lower Yangtze. Science 323: 1607-9.Google Scholar
  11. Fyfe, R.M., A.G. Brown & A.J. Rippon. 2004. Characterising the late prehistoric, ‘Romano-British’ and medieval landscape, and dating the emergence of a regionally distinct agricultural system in South West Britain. Journal of Archaeological Science 31: 1699-714.Google Scholar
  12. Grant, M.J., M.P. Waller & J.A. Groves. 2011. The Tilia decline: vegetation change in lowland Britain during the mid and late Holocene. Quaternary Science Reviews 30: 394-408.Google Scholar
  13. Kaplan, J.O., K.M. Krumhardt & N. Zimmermann. 2009. The prehistoric and preindustrial deforestation of Europe. Quaternary Science Reviews 28: 3016-34.Google Scholar
  14. Klinge, J. & P. Fall. 2010. Archaeobotanical inference of Bronze Age land use and land cover in the eastern Mediterranean. Journal of Archaeological Science 37: 2622-29.Google Scholar
  15. Mithen, S. & E. Black. (ed.) 2011. Water, life and civilisation. Climate, environment and society in the Jordan Valley. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. O’Connor, T. & J.G. Evans. 2005. Environmental archaeology: principles and methods. Stroud: Sutton Publishing.Google Scholar
  17. Parker, A.G., A.S. Goudie, D.E. Andersen, M.A. Robinson & C. Bonsall. 2002. A review of the mid-Holocene elm decline in the British Isles. Progress in Physical Geography 26: 1-45.Google Scholar
  18. Roberts, N. 2002. Did prehistoric landscape management retard the post-glacial spread of woodland in southwest Asia. Antiquity 76: 1002-10.Google Scholar
  19. Santley, R.S., T.W. Killon & M.T. Lycett. 1986. On the Maya collapse. Journal of Anthropological Research 42: 123-59.Google Scholar
  20. Stahl, P.W. 1994. The significance of anthropogenic landscapes in prehistoric South America to studies of biodiversity, in G. Hauser, M. Little & D.F. Roberts (ed.) Man, culture and biodiversity: 3-11. Biology International Special Issue 32.Google Scholar
  21. Tipping, R., A. Davies, R. McCulloch & E. Tisdall. 2008. Response to late Bronze Age climate change of farming communities in north east Scotland. Journal of Archaeological Science 37: 2379-86.Google Scholar
  22. Wick, L., G. Lemcke & M. Sturm. 2003. Evidence of Late glacial and Holocene climatic change and human impact in eastern Anatolia: high-resolution pollen, charcoal, isotopic and geochemical records from the laminated sediments of Lake Van, Turkey. The Holocene 13: 665-75.Google Scholar
  23. Zeder, M.A. 2008. Domestication and early agriculture in the Mediterranean Basin: origins, diffusion, and impact. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105: 11597-604.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ArchaeologyUniversity of ReadingReadingUK