Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology

2014 Edition
| Editors: Claire Smith

Ethnomuseology

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_215

Introduction

Ethnomuseology is the field of scholarship concerning culturally appropriate museum curation and conservation of ethnographic materials using methods that reflect social, cultural, spiritual, or religious aspects of objects. These include traditional and ceremonial forms of care of culturally or spiritually significant objects in mainstream museums as well as methods being used in some community museums, cultural centers, and keeping places where cultural materials, knowledge, and values are actively being maintained and renewed using both traditional practices and conventional museological methods (Clavir 2002; Simpson 2003, 2006a, b, 2007; Kreps 2003; Peers & Brown 2003; Haakanson & Steffian 2004; Henry 2004).

Definition

Conventional museum practices are generally based upon Western scientific principles and the materiality of the object. An ethnomuseological approach is more holistic. It is informed by local knowledge systems and by the spiritual beliefs, cultural...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

References

  1. Canadian Museum of Civilisation, University of Victoria and Commonwealth Association of Museums. 1996. Curatorship: Indigenous perspectives in post-colonial societies (Mercury series Directorate 8). Ottawa: Canadian Museum of Civilization with the Commonwealth Association of Museums and the University of Victoria.Google Scholar
  2. Capone, P. & D. Loren. 2004. Stewardship of sensitive collections: policies, procedures, and the process of their development at the Peabody Museum, in L. E. Sullivan & A. Edwards (ed.). Stewards of the sacred: 155-65. Washington (DC): American Association of Museums in cooperation with the Center for the Study of World Religions, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  3. Clavir, M. 2002.Preserving what is valued: museums, conservation and first nations. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
  4. Conaty, G.T. 2006. Glenbow Museum and First Nations: Fifteen years of negotiating change. Museum Management and Curatorship 21: 254-56.Google Scholar
  5. Haakanson, S. Jr. & A.F. Steffian. 2004. The Alutiiq Museum’s guidelines for the spiritual care of objects, in L. E. Sullivan & A. Edwards (ed.) 2004. Stewards of the sacred: 155-65. Washington (DC): American Association of Museums in cooperation with the Center for the Study of World Religions, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  6. Henry, J.P. 2004. Challenges in managing culturally sensitive collections at the National Museum of the American Indian, in L.E. Sullivan & A. Edwards (ed.). Stewards of the sacred: 105-12. Washington (DC): American Association of Museums in cooperation with the Center for the Study of World Religions, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  7. Herle, A. 1994. Museums and shamans: a cross-cultural collaboration. Anthropology Today 10(1): 2-5.Google Scholar
  8. Hunter, J., B. Koopman & J. Sledge. 2003. Software tools for Indigenous knowledge management. Paper presented at Museums and the Web 2003. Available at: http://www.museumsandtheweb.com/mw2003/papers/hunter/hunter.html.
  9. Kreps, C. 2003. Liberating culture: cross-cultural perspectives on museums, curation, and heritage preservation. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. McCarthy, C. 2011. Museums and Maori: heritage professionals, Indigenous collections, current practice. Wellington: Te Papa Press.Google Scholar
  11. Mibach, L. & S.W. Green. 1989. Sacred objects and museum conservation: kill or cure?, in G.P. Horse Capture (ed.) The concept of sacred materials and their place in the world: 57-66. Cody (WY): Buffalo Bill Historical Center.Google Scholar
  12. Nikocevic, L. 2001. Trying to grasp multiculturality: new museological practice in Istria. Paper presented at the ICME sessions, ICOM Triennial Conference, Barcelona, 2-4 July, 2001. Available at: http://icme.icom.museum/fileadmin/user_upload/pdf/2001/nikocevic.pdf
  13. Peers, L. & A.K. Brown. (ed.) 2003. Museums and source communities: a Routledge reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Ribeiro, B. G. 1994. Ethnomuseologia: Da coleção à exposição. Revista do Museu de Arqueologia e Ethnologia 4: 189-201.Google Scholar
  15. Shepard, G. 2012a. Ethnomuseology at the Goeldi Museum of Brazil. Paper presented at ‘Building dialogues in the Americas’, the 54th International Congress of Americanists, held in Vienna, Austria, 15-20 July 2012.Google Scholar
  16. Shepard, G.H. Jr. 2012b. Objetos, sujeitos e patrimônios Baniwa e Kayapó: Um estudo em etnomuseologia comparada. Unpublished paper presented at ‘Building Dialogues in the Americas’, the 54th Congresso Internacional de Americanistas, Vienna, Austraia, July 2012. Abstract available at: http://ica2012.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/DOEVL_events/ICA/Resumenes_Abstracts_54_ICA_Viena_2012.pdf.
  17. Simpson, M.G. 2006a. A world of museums: new concepts, new models, in A.P. Ribeiro (ed.) The state of the world: 90-121. Lisbon: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.Google Scholar
  18. - 2006b. Revealing and concealing: museums, objects and the transmission of knowledge in Aboriginal Australia, in J. Marstine (ed.) New museum theory and practice: an introduction: 152-77. Malden, Oxford and Carlton: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  19. Simpson, M. G. 2001. Making representations: museums in the postcolonial era. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. - 2003. Introducing ethnomuseology: issues in the management of culturally-sensitive artefacts in museum collections, in L. Kelly & J. Barrett (ed.) Proceedings of UNCOVER: Graduate Research in the Museum Conference, 24th May 2002, Volume 1: 109-17. Sydney: Department of Museum Studies of the University of Sydney and the Australian Museum.Google Scholar
  21. - 2007. Charting the boundaries: indigenous models and parallel practices in the development of the post-museum, in S. J. Knell, S. MacLeod & S. Watson (ed.) Museum revolutions: how museums change and are changed: 235-49. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Stovel, H., N.S. Price & R. Killick. (ed.) 2005. Conservation of living religious heritage: papers from the ICCROM 2003 Forum on living religious heritage: conserving the sacred: 102-6. Rome: ICCROM.Google Scholar
  23. Stránský, Z. 1981. Untitled essay in ‘Interdisciplinarity in Museums’. Museological Working Papers 2: 19.Google Scholar
  24. Sullivan, L.E. & A. Edwards. (ed.) 2004. Stewards of the sacred. Washington (DC): American Association of Museums in cooperation with the Center for the Study of World Religions, Harvard University.Google Scholar

Further Reading

  1. Rosoff, N. B. 1998. Integrating Native views into museum procedures: hopeand practice at the National Museum of the American Indian. Museum Anthropology 22 (91) : 33-42.Google Scholar
  2. Simpson, M. G. 2010. The spirit of change in museums: a study of the influences of indigenous cultural and spiritual beliefs and values on contemporary museum practice. PhD dissertation, Flinders University of South Australia. Available at: http://theses.flinders.edu.au/public/adt-SFU20101206.165012/
  3. Smith, C. & H.M. Wobst. (ed.) 2005. Indigenous archaeologies: decolonising theory and practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Tapsell, P. 2011. Aroha mai: whose museum?, in J. Marstine (ed.) The Routledge companion to museum ethics: redefining ethics for the twenty-first-century museum: 85-111. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Watkins, J. 2001. Indigenous archaeology: American Indian values and scientific practice. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Evocative ConsultingAdelaideAustralia