Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology

2014 Edition
| Editors: Claire Smith

Kennewick Man Case: Scientific Studies and Legal Issues

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_1655

Introduction

The human skeletal remains that have come to be referred to as the “Kennewick Man” or the “Ancient One” were found in July 1996 below the surface of Lake Wallula, a section of the Columbia River pooled behind McNary Dam in Kennewick, Washington. The discovery was made by a pair of college students wading in the shallow water along the southern lake bank. Most commentators and reporters described the legal controversy that developed and swirled around the Kennewick remains in rather super-heated rhetoric pitting the interests of “science” against those of Native Americans. This characterization ignores the detailed, intensive, and wide-ranging scientific investigation of the Kennewick remains undertaken by scientists and scholars as part of the government team’s effort to determine the facts relevant to the questions in the case. Many news reports inaccurately suggested that scientific study of the Kennewick remains did not occur, or that studies were hidden from the...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

References

  1. Brace, C.L., A.R. Nelson, N. Seguchi, H. Oe, L. Sering, P. Qifeng, L. Yongyi & D. Tumen. 2001. Old World sources of the first New World human inhabitants: a comparative craniofacial view. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) 98 (17): 10017-22.Google Scholar
  2. Bruning, S.B. 2006. Complex legal legacies: the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, scientific study, and Kennewick Man. American Antiquity 71: 501-21.Google Scholar
  3. Burke, H., C. Smith, D. Lippert, J. Watkins & L. Zimmerman. 2008. Kennewick Man: perspectives on the Ancient One. Walnut Creek (CA): Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  4. Chatters, J. C. 2000. The recovery and first analysis of an early Holocene human skeleton from Kennewick, Washington. American Antiquity 65(2): 291-316.Google Scholar
  5. Dillehay, T.D.2009. Probing deeper into First American studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) 106 (4): 971-8.Google Scholar
  6. Gould, R.M. 2004. Opinion, Bonnichsen v. United States, 4 February 2004: 1579 ff. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  7. McManamon, F.P. 2013. The archaeology of Kennewick Man. The digital archaeological record (tDAR) project ID 6325. Available at: http://core.tdar.org/project/6325 (accessed 2 April 2013).
  8. Nickens, P.R. 1998. Discovery and recovery of human remains from Columbia Park, Kennewick, WR, July-September 1996. Environmental and Natural Resources Division, Expert Witness Unit, U.S Department of Justice. Available at https://core.tdar.org/document/391003 (accessed 13 May 2013). (tDAR ID: 374888), doi:10.6067/XCV8ZF7P9E.Google Scholar
  9. Owsley, D.W. & R.L. Jantz. 2001. Archaeological politics and public interest in Paleoamerican studies: lessons from Gordon Creek Woman and Kennewick Man. American Antiquity 66: 565-575.Google Scholar
  10. Schurr, T.G. 2004. The peopling of the New World: perspectives from molecular anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology 33: 551-583. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.143932Google Scholar
  11. Swedlund, A. & D. Anderson. 1999. Gordon Creek Woman meets Kennewick Man: new interpretations and protocols regarding the peopling of the Americas. American Antiquity 64: 569-576.Google Scholar
  12. - 2003. Gordon Creek Woman meets Spirit Cave Man: a response to comment by Owsley and Jantz. American Antiquity 68: 161-167.Google Scholar
  13. Watkins, J.E. 2003. Beyond the margin: American Indians, First Nations, and archaeology in North America. American Antiquity 68: 273-285.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Digital AntiquitySchool of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State UniversityTempeUSA