Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology

2014 Edition
| Editors: Claire Smith

Aesthetics in Archaeology

  • Thomas HeydEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_1622

Introduction and Definition

The term “aesthetics” was coined in the eighteenth century by Alexander Baumgarten, who thought of it as “the science of sensible cognition” ( 1961[1750-1758]: §1, p. 107). As such, it concerns the study of how to think the sensible appearance (the look/sound/feel) of things when the focus is on their perceptual qualities as such. Immanuel Kant further added to this conception by proposing that aesthetic judgment involves a claim not based on an (objective) coming to know of the world but on a particular (subjective) feeling produced in the encounter with objects of perception. The feeling in question is produced when the faculties of imagination and understanding are in “free play” while provoked by various objects of perception (Kant 1790 trans. 1987: Pt. 1, Book 1, Section 9).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Baumgarten, A.G. 1961[1750-1758]. Aesthetica. Hildesheim: G. Olms.Google Scholar
  2. Coote, J. & A. Shelton. (ed.) 1992. Anthropology, art and aesthetics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  3. Davies, S. 2006. The philosophy of art. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  4. Dobres, M.-A. 2001. Meaning in the making: agency and the social embodiment of technology and art, in M. B. Schiffer (ed.) Anthropological perspectives on technology: 47-76. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
  5. Forge, A. 1991. Hand stencils: rock art or not? in P. Bahn & A. Rosenfeld (ed.) Rock art and prehistory: 39-44. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
  6. Gell, A. 1992. The technology of enchantment and the enchantment of technology, in J. Coote & A. Shelton (ed.) Anthropology, art and aesthetics: 40–63. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  7. - 1998. Art and agency: towards a new anthropological theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  8. Gosden, C. 2001. Making sense: archaeology and aesthetics. World Archaeology 33(2): 163-167.Google Scholar
  9. Heyd, T. 2003. Rock art aesthetics and cultural appropriation. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 61 (1): 37-46.Google Scholar
  10. - 2007. Cross-cultural contact, etiquette and rock art. Rock-art Research 24 (2): 191-99.Google Scholar
  11. - 2012. Thinking through aesthetics, art, and humanly made marks on rocks in J. McDonald, & P. Veth (ed.) Blackwell's companion to rock art. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  12. Heyd, T. & J. Clegg. (ed.) 2005. Aesthetics and rock art. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  13. Kant, I. 1790 (trans. 1987) Critique of judgment. Translated by W.S. Pluhar. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
  14. Moro Abadía, O. & M.R. González-Morales. 2008. Paleolithic art studies at the beginning of the twenty-first century: a loss of innocence. Journal of Anthropological Research 64 (4): 529-52.Google Scholar
  15. Morphy, H. 1992. From dull to brilliant: the aesthetics of spiritual power among the Yolngu, in J. Coote & A. Shelton (ed.) Anthropology, art, and aesthetics: 51–60. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  16. Morphy, H. 2005. Aesthetics across time and place: an Anthropological perspective on archaeology, in T. Heyd & J. Clegg (ed.) Aesthetics and rock art: 51-60. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  17. Pollard, J. 2001. The aesthetics of depositional practice. World Archaeology 33(2): 315–33.Google Scholar
  18. Soffer, O. & M. W. Conkey. 1997. Studying ancient visual cultures, in M.W. Conkey, O. Soffer, D. Stratmann & N. G. Jablonski (ed.) Beyond art: Pleistocene image and symbol: 1-16. San Francisco: California Academy of Sciences/University of California Press.Google Scholar
  19. Tomásková, S. 1997. Places of art: art and archaeology in context, in M.W. Conkey, O. Soffer, D. Stratmann & N.G. Jablonski (ed.) Beyond art: Pleistocene image and symbol: 265-87. San Francisco: California Academy of Sciences/University of California Press.Google Scholar
  20. White, R. 2003. Prehistoric art: the symbolic journey of humankind. New York: Harry Abrams.Google Scholar
  21. Ziff, P. 1997. Anything viewed, in S. Feagin & P. Maynard (ed.) Aesthetics: 15-30. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of VictoriaVictoriaCanada