Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology

2014 Edition
| Editors: Claire Smith

Translation and Indigenization

  • Ian Lilley
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_1567

Introduction

Translation, broadly speaking, lies at the heart of archaeology. Archaeologists translate their technical recordings of material finds and their contexts into understandings of past human thought and action. They translate the technical findings of other disciplines – geology, say, or physics – into archaeological terms and vice versa. They also translate their work from one language to another, from Vietnamese to French, for instance. Finally, they translate their “technical talk” into lay terms for public consumption. This last is ultimately the most important, because without the understanding and support of the wider, nonprofessional community, it would be well-nigh impossible for archaeologists to access the sites and acquire the funding necessary for them to practice their craft. This entry concerns one special form of “translation for the public,” namely, translation of archaeological approaches and results for Indigenous and other descendent communities. This kind...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Eco, U. 2004. Mouse or rat: translation as negotiation. London: Phoenix.Google Scholar
  2. Fleming, A. 2006. Post-processual landscape archaeology: A critique. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 16: 267-80.Google Scholar
  3. Ingold, T. 2000. The perception of the environment. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Lilley, I. 2009. Strangers and brothers? Heritage, human rights and a cosmopolitan archaeology, in L. Meskell (ed.) Cosmopolitan archaeologies: 48-67. Durham (NC): Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Merry, S. 2006. Transnational human rights and local activism: mapping the middle. American Anthropologist 108: 38-51.Google Scholar
  6. Munday, J. 2001.Introducing translation studies: theories and applications. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Sand, C., J. Bole & A. Ouetcho. 2006. What is archaeology for in the Pacific? History and politics in New Caledonia, in I. Lilley (ed.) Archaeology of Oceania: Australia and the Pacific Islands: 321-45. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  8. Sheehan, N. & I. Lilley. 2008. Things are not always what they seem: Indigenous knowledge and pattern recognition in archaeological analysis, in C. Colwell-Chanthaphonh & T. Ferguson (ed.) Collaboration in archaeological practice: engaging descendent communities: 87-115. Walnut Creek: AltaMira.Google Scholar
  9. Spivak, G. 1993. Outside in the teaching machine. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies UnitUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia