Skip to main content

Taphonomy in Bioarchaeology and Human Osteology

  • Reference work entry

Introduction

Classical Taphonomy

Traditionally, taphonomy was studied by paleontologists to interpret the processes that operate on organic remains that comprise a part of the fossil record. A major focus of taphonomy was to understand the effects of those processes in order to reconstruct the past as it pertains to a particular fossil assemblage (Shipman 1981). Years later, archaeologists began to study taphonomy in order to determine how and why floral and faunal remains accumulated and differentially preserved within the archaeological record. Interpretation of the postmortem, pre-, and post-burial histories of faunal assemblages is critical in determining their association with hominid activity and behavior. Archaeologists typically separate natural from cultural processes when identifying evidence of human interaction with faunal remains (Lyman 1994).

Various models of fossil assemblage formation have been proposed, depicting a general taphonomic history. The taphonomic history...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   5,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allison, P.A. & D.E.G. Briggs. 1991. Taphonomy: releasing the data locked in the fossil record. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, P.A. & D.J. Bottjer. 2010. Taphonomy: bias and process through time, in P.A. Allison & D.J. Bottjer (ed.) Taphonomy second edition: process and bias through time. Volume 32: topics in geobiology: 1-18. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrensmeyer, A.K. 1978. Taphonomic and ecologic information from bone weathering. Paleobiology 4: 150-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrensmeyer, A.K. & S.M. Kidwell. 1985. Taphonomy’s contribution to paleobiology. Paleobiology 11: 105-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrensmeyer, A.K., D. Western & D.E. Dechant Boaz. 1979. New perspectives in vertebrate paleoecology from a recent bone assemblage. Paleobiology 5: 12-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnichsen, R. & M.H. Sorg. 1989.Bone modification: Maine: Center for the Study of First Americans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efremov, I.A. 1940. Taphonomy: a new branch of paleontology.Pan-American Geologist 74: 81-93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haglund, W.D. & M.H. Sorg. 1997. Introduction to forensic taphonomy, in W.D. Haglund & M.H. Sorg (ed.) Forensic taphonomy: the postmortem fate of human remains: 77-90. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, R.L. 1994. Vertebrate taphonomy (Cambridge Manuals in Archaeology series). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, L.G. 1989. Bone modification and “the laws of burial”, in R. Bonnichsen & M.H. Sorg (ed.) Bone modification: 7-24. Maine: Center for the Study of First Americans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R.E. 1999. Taphonomy: a process approach (Cambridge Paleobiology series). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Micozzi, M.S. 1991. Postmortem change in human and animal remains: a systematic approach. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, E.C. 1980. Taphonomy: its history and role in community evolution, in A.K. Behrensmeyer & A.P. Hill (ed.) Fossils in the making: vertebrate taphonomy and paleoecology: 5-19. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipman, P. 1981.Life history of a fossil: an introduction to taphonomy and paleoecology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ubelaker, D.H. 1997. Taphonomic applications in forensic anthropology, in W.D. Haglund & M.H. Sorg (ed.) Forensic taphonomy: the postmortem fate of human remains: 77-90. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Behrensmeyer, A.K. & A.P. Hill. 1980. Fossils in the making: vertebrate taphonomy and paleoecology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, S.K. 1991. The process of fossilization. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, D.P. 1981. Taphonomy and paleoecology: a critical review of archaeology’s sister discipline, in M.B. Schiffer (ed.) Advances in archaeological method and theory, Volume 4: 365-438. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haglund, W.D. & M.H. Sorg. 1997. Advances in forensic taphonomy: method, theory, and archaeological perspectives. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tibbett, M. & D.O. Carter. 2008. Soil analysis in forensic taphonomy: chemical and biological effects of buried human remains. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shari Forbes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Forbes, S. (2014). Taphonomy in Bioarchaeology and Human Osteology. In: Smith, C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_137

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_137

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-0426-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-0465-2

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics