Introduction
To say that gendered social relations are complex would be to profoundly understate the dynamism of the human experience (Rotman 2009). The ways in which individuals understand their roles as gendered beings and their relationships to other gendered beings is constantly pushed and pulled by forces both internal and external to the individual and the family/social/economic unit to which they belong at multiple scales from the household to the community to the nation. Identity, sexuality, cultural prescriptions for social roles, socioeconomic class, ethnic heritage, life cycle, and other dimensions of the cultural world create tensions between societal structures, gender ideals, and individual choices that require continual negotiation, interpretation, and implementation.
Although challenging for scholars who seek to understand these social relations, these complexities are precisely why gender is an endlessly fascinating subject for study. Through time and across space, the...
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Battle-Baptiste, W. 2011. Black feminist archaeology. Walnut Creek (CA): Left Coast Press.
Davies, S.G. 2007. Challenging gender norms: five genders among the Bugis in Indonesia (Case Studies in Anthropology). Belmont (CA): Thomson Wadsworth.
Fausto-Sterling, A. 2000. Sexing the body: gender politics and the construction of sexuality. New York: Basic Books.
Gellar, P. 2009. Identity and difference: complicating gender in archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology 38: 65-81.
Gero, J.M. & M.W. Conkey. 1991. Engendering archaeology: women and prehistory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
McGuire, R. 1988. Dialogues with the dead: ideology and the cemetery, in M.P. Leone & P.B. Potter Jr. (ed.) The recovery of meaning: historical archaeology in the eastern United States: 435-80. Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institution Press.
Mullins, P. 1999. Race and affluence: an archaeology of African American and consumer culture. New York: Kluwer Academic Press.
- 2011. The archaeology of consumer culture, in M.S. Nassaney (ed.) Contributions to the American experience in archaeological perspective. Tallahassee: University of Florida Press.
Nassaney, M. 2004. Native American gender politics and material culture in seventeenth-century southeastern New England. Journal of Social Archaeology 4: 334-67.
Rotman, D.L. 2009. Historical archaeology of gendered lives (Contributions to Global Historical Archaeology). New York: Springer Academic Publishing.
Shackel, P. 1996. Culture change and the new technology: an archaeology of an early American industrial era (Contributions to Global Historical Archaeology). New York; London: Plenum Press.
Spencer-Wood, S. 2012. Commentary: how feminist theory increases our understanding of the archaeology of poverty. Historical Archaeology 45: 183-93.
Voss, B. 2008. The archaeology of ethnogenesis: race and sexuality in colonial San Francisco. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Wall, D. 1991. Sacred dinners and secular teas: constructing domesticity in mid-nineteenth-century New York. Historical Archaeology 25: 69-81.
- 2000. Family meals and evening parties: constructing domesticity in nineteenth-century middle-class New York, in J.A. Delle, S.A. Mrozowski & R. Paynter (ed.) Lines that divide: historical archaeologies of race, class, and gender: 109-41. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
Wilkie, L. 2003. The archaeology of mothering: an African-American midwife’s tale. New York; London: Routledge.
Wurst, L. 2003. The legacy of separate spheres, in D.L. Rotman & E.R. Savulis (ed.) Shared spaces and divided places: material dimensions of gender relations and the American historical landscape: 225-37. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
Further Reading
Andersson, J., M. Elfwendahl, G. Gustafson, B. Hägerman, R. Lundqvist, U. Stenbäck Lönquist, J. Ulfsdotter & S. Welinder. 2011. Visible men and elusive women. Journal of International Historical Archaeology 15: 10-29.
Barile, K.S. & J.C. Brandon. 2004. Household chores and household choices: theorizing the domestic sphere in historical archaeology. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
Contributions to a Global Historical Archaeology. n.d. Available at: http://www.springer.com/series/5734.
Delle, J., S. Mrozowski & R. Painter. (ed.) 2000. Lines that divide: historical archaeologies of race, class, and gender. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
Galle, J.E. & A. Young. (ed.) 2004. Engendering African American archaeology: a southern perspective. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
Greenwood, R.S. & D.N. Slawson. 2008. Gathering insights on isolation. Historical Archaeology 42: 68-79.
Hall, M. & S.W. Silliman. (ed.) 2006. Historical archaeology (Blackwell Studies in Global Archaeology). Malden (MA); Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Hicks, D. & M. Beaudry. (ed.) 2006. The Cambridge companion to historical archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Historical Archaeology. n.d. Available at: http://www.sha.org/publications/SHA_volume_indices/indices.cfm.
International Journal of Historical Archaeology. n.d. Available at: http://www.springer.com/social+sciences/anthropology+%26+archaeology/journal/10761.
Middleton, A. 2007. Silent voice, hidden lives: archaeology, class, and gender in the CMS missions, Bay of Islands, New Zealand, 1814-1845. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 11: 1-31.
Nassaney, M.S., D.L. Rotman, D. Sayers & C. Nickolai. 2001. The southwest Michigan historical landscape project: exploring class, gender, and ethnicity from the ground up. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 5: 219-61.
Nelson, S.M. (ed.) 2007. Women in antiquity: theoretical approaches to gender and archaeology. Lanham (MD): AltaMira Press.
Nickolai, C. 2003. The relevance of nineteenth-century religion to the archaeological record: an example from the home of Ellen White, Prophetess of Seventh-Day Adventism. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 7: 145-59.
Pearson, M. & P.R. Mullins. 1999. Domesticating Barbie: an archaeology of Barbie material culture and domestic ideology. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 3: 225-59.
Rothschild, N.A. 2006. Colonialism, material culture, and identity in the Rio Grande and Hudson River Valleys. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 10: 73-108.
Rotman, D.L. 2006. Separate spheres? Beyond the dichotomies of domesticity. Current Anthropology 47: 666-74.
Rotman, D.L. & E.R. Savulis. (ed.) 2003. Shared spaces and divided places: exploring the material and spatial dimensions of gender relations and American historical landscapes. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
Spencer-Wood, S. 2006. A feminist theoretical approach to the historical archaeology of utopian communities. Historical Archaeology 40: 152-85.
Spude, C.H. 2005. Brothels and saloons: an archaeology of gender in the American West. Historical Archaeology 39: 89-106.
The American Experience in Archaeological Perspective. n.d. Available at: http://www.upf.com/seriesresult.asp?ser=aearch.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this entry
Cite this entry
Rotman, D. (2014). Engendering Historical Archaeology. In: Smith, C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_1363
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_1363
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-0426-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-0465-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law