Introduction
There are two distinct speeches in Brazilian archaeology, an official discourse and an unofficial discourse. In the official discourse, spoken at conferences, in publications, and in classrooms, everything is fine. There are jobs for everyone, archaeological work is being performed, and cultural heritage is protected. Unofficial discourse, comprised of informal conversations that take place in the corridors of Congress, outside the classroom, during the fieldwork, says just the opposite, i.e., that chaos is installed in Brazilian archaeology. The chaos in this case has a name, Contract Archaeology or Commercial Archaeology.
As happened in many other countries, the growth of commercial archaeology in Brazil also resulted in a change in archaeological practice; the difference is that in the Brazilian case, the change was radical. The numbers are impressive. It is estimated that commercial archaeology in Brazil represents about 90 % of all archaeology practiced in the...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Beaudry, M. 2009. Ethical issues in historical archaeology, in T. Majewski & D. Gaimster (ed.) The international handbook of historical archaeology: 17–29. New York: Springer.
Bradley, R. 2006. Bridging the two cultures: commercial archaeology and the study of British prehistory. Paper presented to the Society of Antiquaries of London. Available at: www.sal.org.uk/downloads/bridging-two-cultures.
Chadwick, A. 2003. Post-processualism, professionalisation and archaeological methodologies. Towards reflexive and radical practice. Archaeological Dialogues 10: 97–118.
Edgeworth, M. 2003. Acts of discovery. An ethnography of archaeological practice (BAR International series 1131). Oxford: Archaeopress.
Funari, P.P.A. & E. Robrahn-González. 2008. Ética, capitalismo e arqueologia pública no Brasil. História 27: 13–30.
Hamilakis, Y. 1999. La trahisondes archéologues? Archaeological practice as intellectual activity in postmodernity. Journal of MediterraneanArchaeology 12: 60–79.
Lima, T. (org.). 2002. Atas do simpósio:aarqueologia no meio empresarial. Goiânia, 28 a 31 de agosto de 2000. Goiânia: Instituto Goiano de Pré-História e Antropologia/Sociedade de Arqueologia Brasileira.
Lucas, G. 2001. Critical approaches to fieldwork. London: Routledge.
Tilley, C. 2004. The materiality of stone. Explorations in landscape phenomenology. Oxford: Berg.
Zanettini, P. 2009. Projetar o futuro para a arqueologia Brasileira: desafio de todos. Revista de Arqueologia Americana 27: 71–87.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this entry
Cite this entry
Pellini, J.R. (2014). Ethics of Commercial Archaeology: Brazil. In: Smith, C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_124
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_124
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-0426-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-0465-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law