Skip to main content

Television and Archaeology: Views from the UK and Beyond

  • Reference work entry
Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology
  • 425 Accesses

Introduction

For millions of people, their primary engagement with archaeology is through the now-traditional medium of linear broadcast television (Merriman 1991: 119-20; Holtorf 2007: 52-54). Though undoubtedly challenged by newer ubiquitous information technologies with rapidly evolving modes of reception, after more than half a century, this largely remains the case (Pokotylo & Guppy 1999; Payton 2002; Clack & Brittain 2007: 14). However, any archaeological message on any media platform is generated, transmitted, and received within a particular sociocultural technological environment. Viewed as material culture, the historical, economic, political, and ideological context of broadcasting might itself be considered as an anthropological or indeed archaeological meta-narrative (see Huhtamo & Parrika 2011).

Furthermore, archaeology, a project almost wholly funded directly or indirectly from the public purse, is granted singular public trust (Hodder 1987: 166). Yet, the TV broadcasts...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 5,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aitchison, K. & R. Edwards. 2008. Archaeology labour market intelligence: profiling the profession 2007-2008. Reading: Institute of Field Archaeologists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, G., D. Henson & A. Piccini. 2009. Bonekickers: informing, educating, entertaining?, in S. Lemaitre & C. Schall (ed.) How do the media represent archaeology, what is at stake?: 31-44. Brussels: Kineon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clack, T. & M. Brittain. 2007. Archaeology and the media. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauntlett, D. 1998.Ten things wrong with the effects model. Available at: http://www.theory.org.uk/david/effects.htm (accessed 11 January 2013).

  • Hodder, I. 1987. Reading the past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtorf, C. 2007. Archaeology is a brand. Oxford: Archaeopress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huhtamo, E. & J. Parrika. (ed.) 2011. Media archaeology. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kretschmer, M., S. Singh & J. Wardle. 2009. The exploitation of television formats. ESRC Digital Resource, Bournemouth University. Available at: http://tvformats.bournemouth.ac.uk/index.html (accessed 30 May 2012).

  • Kulik, K. 2006. Archaeology and British television. Public Archaeology 5 (2): 75-90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. 1993.. We have never been modern. Translated by C. Porter. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. & J. Hassard. (ed.) 1999. Actor network theory and after. Oxford: Blackwell and Sociological Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriman, N. 1991. Beyond the glass case: the past, the heritage and the public in Britain. Leicester: Leicester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, S. 2004. Archaeological representation: the visual conventions for constructing knowledge about the past, in I. Hodder (ed.) Archaeological theory today: 262-283. Cambridge: Polity Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Payton, C. 2002. Public perception and ‘pop archaeology’: a survey towards current attitudes toward televised archaeology in Britain. The SAA Archaeological Record March: 33-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piccini, A. 2006. Survey of heritage television viewing 2005-2006. Swindon: English Heritage. Available at: http://hc.english-heritage.org.uk/content/pub/eh_tvcounts_report_final.pdf (accessed 14 January 2013).

  • Pokotylo, D. & N. Guppy. 1999. Public opinion and archaeological heritage: views from outside the profession. American Antiquity 64: 400-416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanks, M. 2007. Digital media, agile design, and the politics of archaeological authorship, in T. Clack & M. Brittain (ed.) Archaeology and the media: 273-289. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wineinger, N. 2011. Visiting the past: an analysis of the drivers of visiting historic attractions. Swindon: English Heritage. Available at: http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/content/imported-docs/u-z/visiting-the-past.pdf (accessed 14 January 2013).

  • Winston, B. 1995. Claiming the real. London: British Film Institute.

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Atkinson, R., D. Collison, B. Greenhill, J. Hale, R.G. Harrison, K. Hudson, P. Jordan, H. Lincoln, M. Magnusson, J.J. Norwich, C. Renfrew. 1978. in R. Sutcliffe (ed.) Chronicle. London: British Broadcasting Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, G. 2010-2013. Broadcasting, in M. Pitts (ed.) British archaeology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtorf, C. 2005. From Stonehenge to Las Vegas: archaeology as popular culture. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, P. 1957. Buried treasure. London: Phoenix House.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Greg Bailey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Bailey, G. (2014). Television and Archaeology: Views from the UK and Beyond. In: Smith, C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_1079

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_1079

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-0426-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-0465-2

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics