Skip to main content

Introduction

Critical psychology (better: critical psychologies) has emerged using multifaceted approaches in theory and practice outside of the mainstream of psychology in many countries around the globe. Although critical-psychological ideas can be found prior to the 1960s, the most important developments were made since that period on the background of the rise of social epistemologies and social movements. Acore goal of critical psychologists was to transform psychology intoan emancipatory, radical, social-justice seeking, or status-quo-resisting approach that understands psychological issues as taking place in specific political-economic or cultural-historical contexts. The term critical psychologywas originally claimed for a German school of thought, but was soon self-applied by psychologists from the English-speaking world and from other linguistic regions who gave the term their own meanings. Critical psychology has an evenlonger history if one considers critiques of...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 679.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 649.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bakan, D. (1967). Idolatry in religion and science. In D. Bakan (Ed.), On method: Toward areconstruction of psychological investigation (pp.150–159). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Original work published 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayer, B., & Malone, K. R. (1998). Feminism, psychology and matters of the body. In H. J. Stam (Ed.), The body and psychology (pp.94–199). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beneke, E. (1845). Lehrbuch der Psychologie als Naturwissenschaft (Zweite, vermehrte und verbesserte Auflage) [Textbook of psychology as anatural science (2nd expanded and improveded.)]. Berlin: Mittler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billig, M. (2008). The hidden roots of critical psychology: Understanding the impact of Locke, Shaftesbury and Reid. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, A.C. (Ed.). (2006). Internationalizing the history of psychology. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudhury, S., Nagel, S.K., & Slaby, J. (2009). Critical neuroscience: Linking neuroscience and society through critical practice. BioSocieties, 4(1), 61–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comte, A. (1896). The positive philosophy of Auguste Comte (Freely translated and condensed by Harriet Martineau. With an introduction by Frederic Harrison). London: George Bell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1985). The methodological imperative in psychology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 15, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1997). Naming the mind: How psychology found its language. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijk, T.A.V. (2008). Discourse and context: Asociocognitive approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilthey, W. (1957). Ideen über eine beschreibende und zergliedernde Psychologie (Ideas on adescriptive and analytical psychology). In W. Dilthey (Ed.), Die geistige Welt: Einleitung in die Philosophie des Lebens (Gesammelte Schriften V. Band) [The mental world: Introduction to the philosophy of life (Collected writings: Volume 5)] (pp.139–240). Stuttgart: Teubner. Original work published 1894.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreier, O. (2007). Psychotherapy in everyday life. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, M. (2006). Bearing witness: Methods for researching oppression and resistance – atextbook for critical research. Social Justice Research, 19(1), 83–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1970). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. London: Tavistock. Original work published 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A.Sheridan, Trans.). London: Lane. (Original work published 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, D.R. (2003). Awareness is good, but action is better. The Counseling Psychologist, 31(3), 299–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, D. (2008). Confronting psychology’s power. Journal of Community Psychology, 36(2), 232–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, D., Prilleltensky, I., & Austin, S. (Eds.). (2009). Critical psychology: An introduction. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1997). Pedagogy of the oppressed (New revised 20th-anniversaryed.) (M.B. Ramos, Trans.). New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. The American Psychologist, 40(3), 266–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K.J. (2009). Relational being: Beyond self and community. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1977). In adifferent voice: Women’s conceptions of self and of morality. Harvard Educational Review, 47(4), 481–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi, A. (1970). Psychology as ahuman science: Aphenomenologically based approach. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, B., & McFadden, M. (2001). Critical social psychology: Anintroduction. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J. (1996). The mismeasure of man (Revised and expanded). New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and human interest (J.J. Shapiro, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press. (German original published in 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (1995). Rewriting the soul: Multiple personality and the sciences of memory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, B. (1997). Repoliticizing the history of psychology. InD. Fox& I. Prilleltensky (Eds.), Critical psychology: An introduction (pp.21–33). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzkamp, K. (1972). Kritische Psychologie: Vorbereitende Arbeiten [Critical psychology: Preparatory works]. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzkamp, K. (1973). Sinnliche Erkenntnis: Historischer Ursprung und gesellschaftliche Funktion der Wahrnehmung [Sensory knowledge: Historical origin and the social function of perception]. Frankfurt am Main: Athenäum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzkamp, K. (1983). Grundlegung der Psychologie [Foundation of psychology]. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzkamp, K. (1991). Experience of self and scientific objectivity. In C.W. Tolman & W. Maiers (Eds.), Critical psychology: Contributions to an historical science of the subject (pp.65–80). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Original work published 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hook, D. (Ed.). (2004). Critical psychology. Lansdowne, South Africa: UCT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, M. (1992). Traditional and critical theory. In D. Ingram& J. Simon-Ingram (Eds.), Critical theory: The essential readings (pp.239–254). New York: Paragon House. Original work published 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, S., & Staeuble, I. (1978). Die gesellschaftliche Genese der Psychologie [The social origins of psychology]. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamin, L.J. (1974). The science and politics of IQ. Potomac: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1970). Metaphysical foundations of natural science. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill. Original work published 1786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1998). Critique of pure reason (P. Guyer & A.W. Wood, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1781).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, E.F. (1985). Reflections on gender and science. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvale, S. (Ed.). (1992). Psychology and postmodernism. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, F.A. (1950). The history of materialism and criticism of its present importance (E.C. Thomas, Trans.) (3rded., with an introduction by B. Russell) (This translation first published inthree volumes in 1877, 1890 and 1892; reissued in one volume in 1925; reprinted in 1950). New York: The Humanities Press. (Original work first published 1866).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J., Sugarman, J.H., & Thompson, J. (2003). Psychology and the question of agency. Albany: Suny.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martín-Baró, I. (1994). Writings for aliberation psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1961). Zur Kritik der politischen Ökonomie [Critique of political economy]. In K. Marx & F. Engels (Eds.), Werke Band 13 [Works: Vol. 13] (pp.3–160). Berlin: Dietz. Original work published 1859.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1958). Die deutsche Ideologie [The German ideology]. In K. Marx & F. Engels (Eds.), Werke Band 3 [Works: Vol. 3] (pp.9–530). Berlin: Dietz. Original work published 1932 (Written 1845/46).

    Google Scholar 

  • Montero, M., & Christlieb, P.F. (Eds.). (2003). Special Issue: Critical Psychology in Latin America. Critical Psychology: The International Journal of Critical Psychology, (9).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morawski, J.G. (2005). Reflexivity and the psychologist. History of the Human Sciences, 18(4), 77–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owusu-Bempah, K., & Howitt, D. (2000). Psychology beyond western perspectives. Leicester: British Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulos, D., Stephenson, N., & Tsianos, V. (2008). Escape routes: Control and subversion in the 21st century. London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, I. (1989). The crisis in modern social psychology: And how to end it. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, I. (2002). Critical discursive psychology. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, I., & Spears, R. (Eds.). (1996). Psychology and society: Radical theory and practice. London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Politzer, G. (1994). Critique of the foundations of psychology: The psychology of psychoanalysis. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press. Original work published 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prilleltensky, I. (1994). The morals and politics of psychology: Psychological discourse and the status quo. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prilleltensky, I., & Nelson, G. (2002). Doing psychology critically: Making adifference in diverse settings. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rexilius, G.E. (Ed.). (1988). Psychologie als Gesellschaftswissenschaft [Psychology as asocial science]. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, G. (1996). Putting psychology in its place: An introduction from acritical historical perspective. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, F.C., Rogers, A., & McCarroll, J. (1998). Toward adialogical self. The American Behavioral Scientist, 41(4), 496–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1996). Inventing our selves: Psychology, power, and personhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.M., & Lee, Y.J. (2007). “Vygotsky’s neglected legacy”: Cultural-historical activity theory. Review of Educational Research, 77(2), 186–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandoval, C. (2000). Methodology of the oppressed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarborough, E., & Furumoto, L. (1987). Untold lives: The first generation of American women psychologists. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sève, L. (1978). Man in Marxist theory and the psychology of personality (J. McGreal, Trans.). Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slife, B.D., Reber, J.S., & Richardson, F.C. (2005). Critical thinking about psychology: Hidden assumptions and plausible alternatives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, T. (1996). Damaged life: The crisis of the modern psyche. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, T. (Ed.). (2000). Critical psychology: Voices for change. NewYork: St. Martin’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stam, H.J. (Ed.). (1998). The body and psychology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T. (2005). The critique of psychology: From Kant to postcolonial theory. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T. (2008). From speculation to epistemological violence in psychology: Acritical-hermeneutic reconstruction. Theory & Psychology, 18(1), 47–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T. (2009). Philosophical concerns in critical psychology. In D. Fox, I. Prilleltensky, & S. Austin (Eds.), Critical psychology: An introduction (2nded., pp.36–53). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T., & Febbraro, A. (2003). Ethnocentrism as aform of intuition in psychology. Theory & Psychology, 13, 673–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, C.W. (1994). Psychology, society, and subjectivity: An introduction to German critical psychology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, C.W. (2009). Holzkamp’s critical psychology as ascience from the standpoint of the human subject. Theory & Psychology, 19(2), 149–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, C.W., & Maiers, W. (Eds.). (1991). Critical psychology: Contributions to an historical science of the subject. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S., & Leary, D.E. (1985). The cult of empiricism in psychology, and beyond. In S. Koch & D.E. Leary (Eds.), A century of psychology as science (pp.594–617). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V., Lucey, H., & Melody, J. (2001). Growing up girl: Psychosocial explorations of gender and class. New York: NewYork University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V. (Ed.). (2002). Challenging subjects: Critical psychology for a new millennium. New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, S.C. (2002). Modernizing the mind: Psychological knowledge and the remaking of society. Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willy, R. (1899). Die Krisis in der Psychologie [The crisis in psychology]. Leipzig: Reisland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston, A.S. (Ed.). (2004). Defining difference: Race and racism in the history of psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Teo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Teo, T. (2012). Critical Psychology. In: Rieber, R.W. (eds) Encyclopedia of the History of Psychological Theories. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0463-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0463-8_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-0425-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-0463-8

  • eBook Packages: Behavioral Science

Publish with us

Policies and ethics