Skip to main content

Introduction

In attempting to formulate a history of theories of memory, it must be noted that the English word “memory” itself has a broadness of application that is not paralleled in other languages. In French, the words la mémoire refer to the ability that the mind–brain system has for retaining representations both of internal events and of external reality; and the words un souvenir refer to an individual retained representation generally identified by its content (referent). For example, if one wanted to translate the question, “Do insects have memory?” into French, one would use la mémoire as an equivalent for the English word “memory.” But if one wanted to translate the question “How strong is your memory of your first day at school?” one would use le souvenir. An analogous classification is found in German, where memory-the-ability is translated as das Gedächtnis and an individually experienced memory representation is translated as eine Erinnerung.

These observations lead to...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 679.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 649.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abercrombie, J. (1843). Inquiries concerning the intellectual powers, and the investigation of truth. Boson: Otis, Broaders, and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H. (1974). Human associative memory. Washington, DC: Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrade, J. (Ed.), (2001). Working memory in perspective. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human development: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Research and theory (Vol. 2, pp. 89–195). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baars, B. J. (1986). The cognitive revolution in psychology. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. (2006). Working memory: An overview. In S. J. Pickering (Ed.), Working memory and education (pp. 1–13). London: Academic Press, Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D., & Larsen, J. D. (2007a). The phonological loop unmasked? A comment on the evidence for a “perceptual-gestural” alternative. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 497–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D., & Larsen, J. D. (2007b). The phonological loop: Some answers and some questions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 512–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experiemental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, D. E. (2003). Taste aversion and preference learning in animals. In J. H. Byrne (Ed.), Learning and memory (2nd ed., pp. 645–647). New York: Macmillan Reference USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernbach, H. A. (1965). A forgetting model for paired associate learning. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 2, 128–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blankenship, A. B. (1938). Memory span: A review of the literature. Psychological Bulletin, 35, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boakes, R. (1984). From Darwin to behaviorism. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudewijnse, G.-J. A., Murray, D. J., & Bandomir, C. A. (1999). Herbart’s mathematical psychology. History of Psychology, 2, 163–193.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boudewijnse, G.-J. A., Murray, D. J., & Bandomir, C. A. (2001). The fate of Herbart’s mathematical psychology. History of Psychology, 4, 107–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G. H. (1961). Application of a model to paired associate learning. Psychometrika, 25, 255–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G. H. (1972). A selective review of organizational factors in memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organization of memory (pp. 93–137). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, D. E., & Broadbent, M. H. P. (1981). Recency effects in visual memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. D. A., Neath, I., & Chater, N. (2007). A temporal ratio model of memory. Psychological Review, 114, 539–576.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. D. A., Preece, T., & Hulme, C. (2000). Oscillator-based memory for serial order. Psychological Review, 107, 127–181.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bush, R. R., & Mosteller, F. (1955). Stochastic models for learning. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, H. (Trans.) (1954). Rhetorica ad Herennium. The Loeb Library, No. 403. London: William Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceraso, J. (1967). The interference theory of forgetting. Scientific American, 317(October), 117–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, C. H., Dawes, R. M., & Tversky, A. (1970). Mathematical psychology: An elementary introduction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87–185.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crowder, R. G. (2003). Eidetic imagery. In J. H. Byrne (Ed.), Learning and memory (2nd ed., pp. 130–132). New York: Macmillan Reference USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, P., Santangelo, V., & Spence, S. (2009). The role of working memory in auditory selective attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 2126–2132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (2008). Making the mind: A history of memory. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M., & Egger, M. D. (2003). Habituation and sensitization in vertebrates. In J. H. Byrne (Ed.), Learning and memory (2nd ed., pp. 223–226). New York: MacMillan Reference USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebbinghaus, H. (1964). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. (H. A. Ruger & C. E. Bussenius, Trans.). New York: Dover. (Original work published 1885).

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgell, B. (1924). Theories of memory. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estes, W. K. (1950). Towards a statistical theory of learning. Psychological Review, 47, 96–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estes, W. K. (1960). Learning theory and the new “mental chemistry”. Psychological Review, 67, 202–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estes, W. K. (1972). An associative basis for coding and organization in memory. In A. W. Melton & E. Martin (Eds.), Coding processes in human memory (pp. 161–190). Washington, DC: V. H. Winston & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estes, W. K. (1997). Processes of memory loss, recovery, and distortion. Psychological Review, 104, 148–169.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Estes, W. K. (2003). Mathematical learning theory. In J. H. Byrne (Ed.), Learning and memory (2nd ed., pp. 359–362). New York: Macmillan Reference USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estes, W. K., Hopkins, B. L., & Crothers, E. J. (1960). All-or-none and conservation effects in the learning and retention of paired associates. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 329–339.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farah, M. J., Hammond, K., Levine, D., & Calvanio, R. (1988). Visual and spatial mental imaging: Dissociable systems of representation. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 439–462.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1973). Madness and civilization: A history of insanity in the age of reason. New York: Vintage Books. Original work published 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaito, J. (1966). Molecular psychobiology: A chemical approach to learning and other behavior. Springfield, IL: Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, F. (1883). Inquiries into human faculty and its development. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, J., Ervin, F. R., & Koelling, R. A. (1966). Learning with prolonged delay of reinforcement. Psychonomic Science, 5, 121–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garden, S., Cormoldi, C., & Logie, R. H. (2002). Visuo-spatial working memory in navigation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 35–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillund, G., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91, 1–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glanzer, M., & Cunitz, A. R. (1966). Two storage mechanisms in free recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 351–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glanzer, M., Adams, J. K., Iverson, G. J., & Kim, K. (1993). The regularities of recognition memory. Psychological Review, 104, 728–748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomulicki, B. R. (1953). The development and present status of the trace theory of memory. British Journal of Psychology Monograph Supplements XXIX. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grey, R. (1859). Memoria technica, or method of artificial memory. Oxford: J. Vincent. Original work published 1730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grodzinsky, Y. (2000). The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca’s area. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 1–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gulliksen, H. (1934). A rational equation of the learning curve based on Thorndike’s law of effect. Journal of General Psychology, 11, 395–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haber, R. N., & Haber, R. B. (1964). Eidetic imagery: I. Frequency. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 19, 131–138.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (1995). Rewriting the soul. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, S. W. (1852). The works of Thomas Reid, D. D (3rd ed.). Edinburgh: MacLachlan and Stewart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanley, J. R., & Cohen, G. (2008). Memory for people: Faces, names and voices. In G. Cohen & M. Conway (Eds.), Memory in the real world (3rd ed., pp. 107–140). New York: Psychology Press Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Head, H. (1926). Aphasia and kindred disorders of speech. (2 Vols.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebb, D. O., & Foord, E. N. (1945). Errors of visual recognition and the nature of the trace. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35, 335–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbart, J. F. (1890) Psychologie als Wissenschaft [Psychology as science]. In K. Kehrbach & O. Flügel (Eds.), Jon. Fr. Herbart’s sämtliche Werke in chronologischer Reihenfolge (Part I: Vol. 5, pp. 177–434). Langensalza, Germany: Hermann Beyer und Söhne. (Original work published 1824).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilgard, E. R., & Campbell, A. A. (1936). The course of acquisition and retention of conditioned eyelid responses in man. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 19, 227–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintzman, D. L. (1984). MINERVA2: A simulation model of human memory. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 16, 96–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of behavior: An introduction to behavior theory. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, C. L., Hovland, C. I., Ross, R. T., Hall, M., Perkins, D. T., & Fitch, F. B. (1940). Mathematico-deductive theory of rote learning. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1955). A treatise of human nature. (L. A. Selby-Bigge, Ed.). London: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1739).

    Google Scholar 

  • Iacoboni, M. (2009). Mirroring people: The science of empathy and how we connect with others. New York: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (1887). Experiments on “prehension”. Mind, 12, 75–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1950). The principles of psychology. New York: Dover. Original work published 1890.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jevons, W. G. (1871). The power of numerical discrimination. Nature, 3, 281–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, E. R. (1967). Mechanisms of memory. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. M., Hughes, R. W., & Macken, W. J. (2006). Perceptual organization masquerading as phonological storage: Further support for a perceptual-gestural view of short-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 265–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. M., Hughes, R. W., & Macken, W. J. (2007). The phonological store abandoned. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 505–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. N., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (2007). Representing word meaning and order information in a composite holographic lexicon. Psychological Review, 114, 1–37.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kamil, A. C., Balda, A. P., & Olso, D. J. (1994). Performance of four seed-caching corvid species in the radial-arm maze. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 108, 385–393.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, E. R. (2006). In search of memory: The emergence of a new science of mind. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, D. B., & Wertheimer, M. (2005). Max Wertheimer and Gestalt theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köhler, W., & von Restorff, H. (1937). II. Analyse von Vorgängen im Spurenfeld. Zur Theorie der Reproduktion. [II. Analysis of processes in the trace-field. Towards a theory of memory reproduction]. Psychologische Forschung, 21, 56–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laming, D. (1973). Mathematical psychology. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laming, D. (2009). Failure to recall. Psychological Review, 116, 157–186.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lashley, K. S. (1929). Brain mechanisms and intelligence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lashley, K. S. (1960). In search of the engram. In F. A. Beach, D. O. Hebb, C. T. Morgan, & H. W. Nissen (Eds.), The neuropsychology of Lashley (pp. 478–505). New York: McGraw-Hill. Original work published 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, D. N., Warrach, J., & Farah, M. (1985). Two visual systems in mental imagery: Dissociation of “what” and “where” in imagery disorders due to bilateral posterior cerebral lesions. Neurology, 35, 1010–1018.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowsky, S., Duncan, M., & Brown, G. D. A. (2004). Time does not cause forgetting in short-term serial recall. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 771–790.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lones, T. E. (1912). Aristotle’s researches in natural science. London: West, Newman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, D. F. (1999). Consciousness, mental imagery and action. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 567–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, E. (1965). Transfer of verbal paired associates. Psychological Review, 72, 327–343.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McKeon, R. (Ed.), (1941). De memoria et reminiscentia. In The basic works of Aristotle (pp. 607–617). New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melton, A. W., & von Lackum, W. J. (1941). Retroactive and proactive inhibition in retention: Evidence for a two-factor theory of retroactive inhibition. American Journal of Psychology, 54, 157–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mensink, G.-J., & Raaijmakers, J. G. W. (1988). A model for interference and forgetting. Psychological Review, 95, 434–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, J. (1991). Composite memories. In W. E. Hockley & S. Lewandowsky (Eds.), Relating theory and data: Essays on human memory in honor of Bennet B. Murdock (pp. 399–423). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, W. (1898). The nature and development of animal intelligence. London: T. Fisher Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, C. L. (1895). An introduction to comparative psychology. London: Walter Scott Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulin, C. J. A., & Gathercole, E. (2008). Memory changes across the lifespan. In G. Cohen & M. Conway (Eds.), Memory in the real world (3rd ed., pp. 305–326). New York: Psychology Press Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, G. E., & Pilzecker, A. (1900). Experimentelle Beiträge zur Untersuchung des Gedächtnisses. [Experimental contributions to the investigation of memory]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, Ergänzungsband, No. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, B. B. Jr., (1983). A distributed memory model for serial-order information. Psychological Review, 90, 316–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, B. B. Jr., (1993). TODAM2: A model for the storage and retrieval of item, associative, and serial-order information. Psychological Review, 100, 183–203.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, D. J. (1967). The role of speech responses in short-term memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 21, 263–276.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, D. J. (1988). A history of Western psychology (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, D. J. (1994). What are the “goals” of the human memory system? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 676–677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, D. J. (1995). Gestalt psychology and the cognitive revolution. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, D. J. (2000). The trace deletion hypothesis in relation to partial matching theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 43–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, D. J., & Bandomir, C. A. (2002). The predictive validity of Herbart’s psychology. Psychologie et Histoire, 3, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, D. J., & Farahmand, B. (1998). Gestalt psychology and evolutionary psychology. In R. W. Rieber & K. Salzinger (Eds.), Psychology: Theoretical-historical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 254–287). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, D. J., & Newman, F. M. (1973). Visual and verbal coding in short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 100, 58–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, D. J., & Ross, H. E. (1982). Vives (1538) on memory and recall. Canadian Psychology, 23, 22–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, D. J., Mastronardi, J., & Duncan, S. (1972). Selective attention to ‘physical’ versus ‘verbal’ aspects of coloured words. Psychonomic Science, 26, 305–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, D. J., Boudreau, N., Burggraf, K. K., Dobell, L., Guger, S. L., Leask, A., et al. (1999). A grouping interpretation of the modality effect in immediate probed recognition. Memory & Cognition, 27, 234–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, D. J., Burhop, J., Centa, S., Chande, N., Oinonen, K., Thomas, T., et al. (1998). A partial matching theory of the mirror effect in immediate probed recognition. Memory & Cognition, 26, 1196–1213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nairne, J. S. (1990). A feature model of immediate memory. Memory & Cognition, 16, 343–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neath, I., & Nairne, J. S. (1995). Word-length effects in immediate memory: Overwriting trace decay theory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 429–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neath, I., & Surprenant, A. M. (2003). Human memory (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolas, S., & Murray, D. J. (1999). Théodule Ribot (1839–1916), founder of French psychology: A biographical introduction. History of Psychology, 2, 271–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A. (Ed.). (1970). Models of human memory. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberauer, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2008). Forgetting in immediate serial recall: Decay, temporal distinctiveness, or interference? Psychological Review, 115, 544–576.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rhinehart, and Winston Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (1990). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (2007). Mind and its evolution: A dual coding theoretical approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlov, I. P. (1960). Conditioned reflexes (G. V. Anrep, Trans.). New York: Dover. (Original work published 1927).

    Google Scholar 

  • Penney, C. G. (1989). Modality effects and the structure of short-term verbal memory. Memory & Cognition, 17, 398–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perruchet, P., & Vinter, A. (2002). The self-organizing consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 297–388.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I., & Raichle, M. E. (1994). Images of mind. New York: Scientific American Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postman, L. (1971). Organization and interference. Psychological Review, 78, 290–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postman, L., & Underwood, B. J. (1973). Critical issues in interference theory. Memory & Cognition, 1, 19–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pribram, K. H. (1969). The neurophysiology of remembering. Scientific American, 220, 73–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raaijmakers, J. G. W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1981). Search of associative memory. Psychological Review, 88, 93–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliff, R. (1990). Connectionist models of recognition memory: Constraints imposed by learning and forgetting functions. Psychological Review, 97, 285–308.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliff, R., & Starns, J. J. (2009). Modeling confidence and response time in recognition memory. Psychological Research, 116, 59–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Restle, F., & Greeno, J. G. (1970). Introduction to mathematical psychology. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, D. A. (1962). Memory for form. In L. Postman (Ed.), Psychology in the making: Histories of selected research problems (pp. 402–465). New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., & Fogassi, L. (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 131–141.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rock, I. (1957). The role of repetition in associative learning. American Journal of Psychology, 70, 186–193.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roediger, H. L., III. (1980). Memory metaphors in cognitive psychology. Memory & Cognition, 8, 231–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romanes, G. J. (1882). Animal intelligence. London: Kegan Paul, Trench & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romanes, G. J. (1883). Mental evolution in animals. London: Kegan Paul, Trench & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romanes, G. J. (1888). Mental evolution in man. London: Kegan Paul, Trench & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, W. R. (1959). Brain memory learning: A neurologist’s view. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scoville, W. B., & Milner, B. (1957). Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions. Journal of Neurological and Neurosurgical Psychiatry, 20, 11–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searleman, A., & Herrmann, D. (1994). Memory from a broader perspective. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N., & Cooper, L. A. (1982). Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J. D. (1981). The doctrine of the nerves: Chapters in the history of neurology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standing, L. (1973). Learning 10, 000 pictures. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 207–222.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, L., & Ward, G. (2000). A recency-based account of the primacy effect in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 26, 1589–1625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. L. (1930). The learning function. Journal of General Psychology, 3, 469–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organization of memory (pp. 382–403). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Békésy, G. (1967). Sensory inhibition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Restorff, H. (1933). Über die Wirkung von Bereichsbildung im Spurenfeld. [On the effect of the formation of group domains in the trace-field]. Psychologische Forschung, 18, 299–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, M. J. (2003). Memory span. In J. H. Byrne (Editor-in-Chief), Learning and memory (2nd ed.) (pp. 379–381). New York: Macmillan Reference USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. B. (1928). The ways of behaviorism. New York: Harpers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. B. (1930). Behaviorism (Vol. 2). Chicago: Chicago University Press. Original work published 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waugh, N. C., & Norman, D. A. (1965). Primary memory. Psychological Review, 72, 89–104.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wickelgren, W. A., & Norman, D. A. (1966). Strength models and serial position in short-term recognition memory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 3, 316–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, H., Conway, M., & Cohen, G. (2008). Autobiographical memory. In G. Cohen & M. Conway (Eds.), Memory in the real world (3rd ed., pp. 21–90). New York: Psychology Press Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfson, H. A. (1935). The internal senses in Latin, Arabic and Hebrew philosophic texts. Harvard Theological Review, 28, 69–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodworth, R. S. (1938). Experimental psychology. New York: Henry Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, D., & Loftus, E. (2008). Eyewitness memory. In G. Cohen & M. Conway (Eds.), Memory in the real world (3rd ed., pp. 91–105). New York: Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulf, F. (1922). Über die Veränderung von Vorstellungen (Gedächtnis und Gestalt). [On the transformation of Vorstellungen (memory and Gestalt)]. Psychologische Forschung, 1, 333–373. Abridged translation in W. D. Ellis (Ed.) (1938), A source book of Gestalt psychology (pp. 136–148). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wundt, W. (1874). Grundzüge der physiologischen Psychologie. [Principles of physiological psychology]. Leipzig: W. Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, F. A. (1966). The art of memory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. N. (1961). Bibliography of memory. Philadelphia: Chilton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeki, S. (1992). The visual image in mind and brain. Scientific American, 267, 68–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Murray, D.J. (2012). Theories of Memory, History of. In: Rieber, R.W. (eds) Encyclopedia of the History of Psychological Theories. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0463-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0463-8_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-0425-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-0463-8

  • eBook Packages: Behavioral Science

Publish with us

Policies and ethics