Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy

2011 Edition
| Editors: Henrik Lagerlund

Boethius' De topicis differentiis, Commentaries on

  • Heine Hansen
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9729-4_89

Abstract

Boethius’ On Topical Differences (De topicis differentiis) is a monograph in four books on topical argumentation, that is, argumentation based on so-called topoi or loci (literally: “places”). The seminal treatment of this subject is found in Aristotle’s Topics, but Boethius’ treatise served as the main foundation of medieval theorizing in the field for almost two centuries before the gradual rediscovery and introduction of Aristotle’s text. In this way, Boethius defined some of the basic features of the medieval approach to the issue, and as a consequence came also to influence the medieval interpretation of Aristotle’s Topics. This article surveys the surviving medieval commentaries on On Topical Differences and their approach to two questions raised by Boethius’ text, namely, what loci are and how they function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Bibliography

Primary Sources

  1. Abelard Peter (1969) Super Topica glossae, ed. dal Pra M. Pietro Abelardo, Scritti di Logica. La Nuova Italia, Firenze, pp 206–330Google Scholar
  2. Anonymous (2005) De topicis differentiis, ed. Hansen H. Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen-Age Grec et Latin 76:45–130Google Scholar
  3. Boethius (1990) De topicis differentiis, ed. Nikitas DZ. The Academy of Athens/Vrin, Athens/ParisGoogle Scholar
  4. Boethius (1978) De topicis differentiis, trans. Stump E. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  5. Brito Radulphus (1978) Quaestiones super Libro topicorum Boethii, ed. Green-Pedersen NJ. Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen-Age Grec et Latin 26:1–92Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

  1. Ebbesen S (1993) The theory of loci in antiquity and the Middle Ages. In: Jacobi K (ed) Argumentationstheorie. Brill, Leiden, pp 15–39Google Scholar
  2. Green-Pedersen NJ (1973) On the interpretation of Aristotle’s Topics in the thirteenth century. Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen-Age Grec et Latin 9:1–46Google Scholar
  3. Green-Pedersen NJ (1976) Discussions about the status of the Loci Dialectici in works from the middle of the 13th century. Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen-Age Grec et Latin 20:38–78Google Scholar
  4. Green-Pedersen NJ (1977) The doctrine of ‘Maxima Propositio’ and ‘Locus Differentia’ in commentaries from the 12th century on Boethius’ ‘Topics’. Studia Mediewistyczne 18(2):125–163Google Scholar
  5. Green-Pedersen NJ (1984) The tradition of the topics in the Middle Ages. Philosophia Verlag, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  6. Green-Pedersen NJ (1987) The topics in medieval logic. Argumentation 1:407–417Google Scholar
  7. Hansen H (forthcoming) In voce/in re in the Primum oportet. In: Rosier-Catach I (ed) Arts du langage et théologie aux confins des XIe/XIIe siècles. Brepols, TurnhoutGoogle Scholar
  8. Stump E (1989) Dialectic and its place in the development of medieval logic. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heine Hansen
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for the Aristotelian TraditionThe SAXO Institute University of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark