Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy

2011 Edition
| Editors: Henrik Lagerlund

Berthold of Moosburg

  • Irene Zavattero
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9729-4_82


Berthold of Moosburg was a fourteenth-century German Dominican. He was called to direct the Dominican studium in Cologne in 1335, where he was involved in resolving the crisis caused by the conviction of Meister Eckhart’s doctrines (1329). The doctrinal solution proposed by Berthold is contained in his Commentary on Proclus’s Elements of Theology (Expositio super elementationem theologicam Procli), the only medieval commentary on Proclus, a veritable summa of Neoplatonism. Berthold’s project was to promote the return to the Neoplatonic tradition of the German Dominicans, dating back to Albert the Great. He demonstrated that the Albertine school was an autonomous and unitary cultural identity that had its roots in ancient wisdom, of which Proclus, according to Berthold, was the most outstanding exponent. Berthold sees in the Greek diadochus a “divine man” who could scan the divine properties, which are present in the totality of the real world, and therefore ascend to God only by means of the natural reason. In the same way, according to Berthold, the philosopher who studies Proclian theorems performs a cognitive ascent that leads him to the contemplation of God. This is possible by virtue of the presence in man of a divine faculty, which is the “One of the soul.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


Primary Sources

  1. Bertholdus de Mosburch (1974) Expositio super Elementationem theologicam Procli, 184–211, De animabus, ed. Sturlese L. Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, RomaGoogle Scholar
  2. Bertholdus de Mosburch (1984–2007) Expositio super Elementationem theologicam Procli, I–IV,VI–VII, ed. Sturlese L et al. Meiner, Hamburg (Corpus Philosophorum Teutonicorum Medii Aevi VI, 1–4; 6–7)Google Scholar
  3. Bertoldo di Moosburg (2000) Tabula contentorum in Expositione super Elementationem theologicam Procli, ed. Beccarisi A. Scuola Normale Superiore, PisaGoogle Scholar

Secondary Sources

  1. de Libera A (1984) Introduction à la mystique rhénane d’Albert le Grand à Maître Eckhart. O.E.I.L, Paris, pp 317–442Google Scholar
  2. Gersh SE (2001) Berthold von Moosburg and the content and method of platonic philosophy. In: Aersten JA et al (eds) Nach der Verurteilung von 1277. Philosophie und Theologie an der Universität von Paris im letzen Viertel des 13. Jahrhunderts. Studien und Texte, W. de Gruyter, Berlin/New York, pp 493–503Google Scholar
  3. Imbach R (1996) Chronique de philosophie. Le (néo-)platonisme médiéval, Proclus latin et l’école dominicaine allemande. In: Imbach R Quodlibeta. Ausgewählte Artikel. Universitätsverlag, Freiburg Schweiz, pp 129–151Google Scholar
  4. Iremadze T (2004) Konzeptionen des Denkens im Neuplatonismus: Zur Rezeption der Proklischen Philosophie im Deutschen und Georgischen Mittelalter Dietrich von Freiberg – Berthold von Moosburg – Joane Petrizi. Gruner, Amsterdam/PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  5. Sannino A (2000) The hermetic sources in Berthold of Moosburg. J Warburg Courtauld Inst 63:243–258Google Scholar
  6. Sannino A (2003) Il concetto ermetico di natura in Bertoldo di Moosburg. In: Lucentini P et al (eds) Hermetism from late antiquity to humanism. Brepols, Turnhout, pp 203–221Google Scholar
  7. Sannino A (2008) Il “Liber viginti quattuor philosophorum” nella metafisica di Bertoldo di Moosburg. In: Beccarisi A et al (eds) Per perscrutationem philosophicam. Neue Perspektiven der mittelalterlichen Forschung. Loris Sturlese zum 60. Geburtstag gewidmet, Meiner, Hamburg, pp 252–272Google Scholar
  8. Sturlese L (1984) Proclo ed Ermete in Germania da Alberto Magno a Bertoldo di Moosburg. Per una prospettiva di ricerca sulla cultura filosofica tedesca nel secolo delle sue origini (1250–1350). In: Flash K (ed) Von Meister Dietrich zu Meister Eckhart, Meiner, Hamburg, pp 22–33Google Scholar
  9. Sturlese L (1985) Note su Bertoldo di Moosburg O.P., scienziato e filosofo. Freib Z Philos Theol 32:249–259Google Scholar
  10. Sturlese L (1987) Il dibattito sul Proclo latino nel Medioevo fra l’università di Parigi e lo ‘studium’ di Colonia. In: Boss G, Seel G (eds) Proclus et son influence, Éditions du Grand Midi, Zürich, pp 261–285Google Scholar
  11. Sturlese L (2007) Homo divinus. Der Prokloskommentar Bertholds von Moosburg und die Probleme der nacheckhartschen Zeit. In: Sturlese L (ed) Homo divinus. Philosophische Projekte in Deutschland zwischen Meister Eckhart und Heinrich Seuse. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart, pp 137–154Google Scholar
  12. Tautz IJ (2002) Erst-Eines, Intellekte, Intellektualität: eine Studie zu Berthold von Moosburg. Kovač, HamburgGoogle Scholar
  13. Zavattero I (2005) La figura e il pensiero di Proclo in Bertoldo di Moosburg. ARKETE 1:51–67Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Irene Zavattero
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Filologia Classica e Scienze FilosoficheUniversità del SalentoLecceItaly