Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy

2011 Edition
| Editors: Henrik Lagerlund

Bartholomaeus Arnoldi de Usingen

  • Pekka Kärkkäinen
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9729-4_76

Abstract

Bartholomaeus Arnoldi (b. c. 1465, d. September 9, 1532) (also called Usingen after his birthplace), began as a philosopher in the via moderna school and later became a member and a theologian of the Order of Augustinian Hermits. Together with Jodocus Trutfetter he was the most prominent philosopher in Erfurt in the early sixteenth century. Usingen’s main authorities were Buridan, Ockham, Gregory of Rimini, Peter of Ailly and Gabriel Biel. The focus of his teaching was on a “common view of the via moderna,” which was strongly involved in semantic–metaphysical questions. Usingen stressed the importance of logic as a necessary tool for gaining scientific knowledge, but his works on natural philosophy in particular were respected by his contemporaries. In natural philosophy, he generally followed the Buridanian tradition. His discussion on the theory of supposition follows Ockham. On the relationship between theology and philosophy, he strongly posited the unity of truth by allowing certain theological truths a sufficient degree of plausibility as truths in natural philosophy. This view was partly based on Lawrence of Lindores.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

Primary Sources

  1. Bartholomaeus Arnoldi de Usingen (1499) Parvulus philosophie naturalis. Wolfgang St­ckel, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartholomaeus Arnoldi de Usingen (1509) Compendium novum totius logice. Wolfgang Schenk, ErfurtGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartholomaeus Arnoldi de Usingen (1978) Responsio contra Apologiam Philippi Melanchthonis, ed. Simoniti P. Augustinus-Verlag, WürzburgGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartholomaeus Arnoldi de Usingen (2001) Questio de quiditate quantitatis continue in disputatione de quolibet Erffordie A. D. 1497 determinata secundum editionem Lipsiensem A. D. 1499, ed. W­hler H-U. In: Disputatio de quolibet Erffordie 1497. Bochumer philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter 6, 161–195Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

  1. Bäumer R (1985) Bartholomäus von Usingen OESA (ca. 1465–1532). In: Iserloh E (ed) Katholisches Leben und Kirchenreform im Zeitalter der Glaubensspaltung. Vereinsschriften der Gesellschaft zur Herausgabe des Corpus Catholicorum 45. Aschendorff, Münster, pp 27–37Google Scholar
  2. Dieter Th (2001) Der junge Luther und Aristoteles. Eine historisch-systematische Untersuchung zum Verhältnis von Theologie und Philosophie. Walter de Gruyter, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  3. Häring N (1939) Die Theologie des Erfurter Augustiner-Eremiten Bartholomäus Arnoldi von Usingen. Pallottiner, LimburgGoogle Scholar
  4. Kärkkäinen P (2005) Theology, philosophy and immortality of soul in the late via moderna of Erfurt. Vivarium 43(2):337–360Google Scholar
  5. Kärkkäinen P (2008) Objects of sense perception in late medieval Erfurtian nominalism. In: Knuuttila S, Kärkkäinen P (eds) Theories of perception in medieval and early modern philosophy. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  6. Kleineidam E (1992) Universitas studii Erffordiensis. Überblick über die Geschichte der Universität Erfurt im Mittelalter 1392–1521, vol II. Benno, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  7. Lalla S (2003) Secundum viam modernam. Ontologischer Nominalismus bei Bartholomäus Arnoldi von Usingen. Epistemata. Würzburger wissenschaftliche Schriften, Reihe Philosophie, 343. Königshausen & Neumann, WürzburgGoogle Scholar
  8. Paulus N (1893) Der Augustiner Bartholomäus Arnoldi von Usingen. Luthers Lehrer und Gegner Strassburger theologische Studien I, 3. Herder, StrassburgGoogle Scholar
  9. Urban W (1981) Die ‘via Moderna’ an der Universität Erfurt am Vorabend der Reformation. In: Oberman HA (ed) Gregor von Rimini Werk und Wirkung bis zur Reformation, Spätmittelalter und Reformation, Texte und Untersuchungen 20. Gruyter, Berlin, pp 311–330Google Scholar
  10. Wöhler H-U (2004) Die Erfurter Via moderna im Spiegel der Naturphilosophie. In: Aertsen JA, Pickavé M (eds) Herbst des Mittelalters? Fragen zur Bewertung des 14. und 15. Jahrhunderts Miscellanea Mediaevalia 31. Gruyter, Berlin, pp 524–538Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pekka Kärkkäinen
    • 1
  1. 1.University of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland