Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy

2011 Edition
| Editors: Henrik Lagerlund

Proofs of the Existence of God

  • Tomas Ekenberg
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9729-4_421

Abstract

The question whether God exists, although not in itself an issue for a faithful Muslim, Christian, or Jew, continually attracted the interest of religious thinkers throughout the Middle Ages. Fueled by metaphysical, epistemological, and logical considerations inspired by Ancient Greek philosophy, the discussions brought to the forefront questions about being and existence, time and causal dependence, the limits of human knowledge, and the strengths and limitations of reasoning and demonstration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

Primary Sources

  1. Anselm (1946a) Monologion. In: Schmitt FS (ed) Sancti Anselmi opera omnia, vol 1. Thomas Nelson, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  2. Anselm (1946b) Proslogion. In: Schmitt FS (ed) Sancti Anselmi opera omnia, vol 1. Thomas Nelson, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  3. Aquinas Thomas (1952–1956) In: Caramello P (ed) Summa theologiae. Marietti, TurinGoogle Scholar
  4. Aquinas Thomas (1961–1967) In: Marc P, Pera C, Caramello P (eds) Summa contra gentiles. Marietti, TurinGoogle Scholar
  5. Athanasius (1971) In: Thomson RW (ed and trans) Contra gentes. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Augustine (1970) De libero arbitrio. Corpus christianorum series latina, vol 29. Brepols, TurnhoutGoogle Scholar
  7. Averroes (1969) Tahafut al-Tahafut (The Incoherence of the Incoherence) (trans: van den Bergh S). Luzac, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Avicenna (2005) In: Marmura ME (ed and trans) The metaphysics of the healing: a parallel English-Arabic text. Brigham Young University Press, ProvoGoogle Scholar
  9. Bonaventure (1882) In primum librum sententiarum. In: Collegii PP, Bonaventurae S (eds) Opera omnia, vol 1. Collegium S. Bonaventurae, QuarrachiGoogle Scholar
  10. Bonaventure (1885) In secundum librum sententiarum. In: Collegii PP, Bonaventurae S (eds) Opera omnia, vol 2. Collegium S. Bonaventurae, QuarrachiGoogle Scholar
  11. Bonaventure (1891) Quaestiones disputatae; De mysterio trinitatis. In: Collegii PP, Bonaventurae S (eds) Opera omnia, vol 5. Collegium S. Bonaventurae, QuarrachiGoogle Scholar
  12. Candidus (1872) Dicta candidi de imagine dei. In: Hauréau B (ed) Histoire de la philosophie scolastique, vol 1. Durand et Pedone-Lauriel, Paris, pp 134–137Google Scholar
  13. Duns Scotus John (1966) In: Wolter AB (ed and trans) A treatise on God as first principle; a revised Latin text of the De primo principio translated into English along with two related questions from an early commentary on the Sentences. Forum Books, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  14. Gaunilo (1946) Pro insipiente. In: Schmitt FS (ed) Sancti Anselmi opera omnia, vol 1. Thomas Nelson, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  15. Maimonides Moses (1963) The guide of the perplexed (trans: Pines S). University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  16. Philoponus John (1987) Against Aristotle on the eternity of the world (De aeternitate mundi contra Aristotelem), fragments compiled and trans. Wildberg C. Duckworth, LondonGoogle Scholar

Secondary Sources

  1. Bencivenga E (1993) Logic and other nonsense: the case of Anselm and his God. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  2. Craig WL (1979) The Kalam cosmological argument. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Craig WL (1980) The cosmological argument from Plato to Leibniz. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Cross R (2005) Duns Scotus on God. Ashgate, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  5. Davidson HA (1969) John Philoponus as a source of medieval Islamic and Jewish proofs of creation. J Am Oriental Soc 89(2):357–391Google Scholar
  6. Davidson HA (1987) Proofs for eternity, creation, and the existence of God in medieval Islamic and Jewish philosophy. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Dumont SD (1984) The quaestio si est and the metaphysical proof for the existence of God according to Henry of Ghent and John Duns Scotus. Franziskanische Studien 66:335–367Google Scholar
  8. Fakhry M (1986) The ontological argument in the Arabic tradition: the case of al-Farabi. Studia Islamica 64:5–17Google Scholar
  9. Hammond R (1947) The philosophy of Alfarabi and its influence on medieval thought. Hobson Book Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Kenny A (1969) The five ways: St Thomas Aquinas proofs of God’s existence. Routledge and Kegan Paul, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Klima G (2000) Saint Anselm’s proof: a problem of reference, intentional identity and mutual understanding. In: Holmström-Hintikka G (ed) Medieval philosophy and modern times. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 69–88Google Scholar
  12. Marmura ME (1980) Avicenna’s proof from contingency for God’s existence in the metaphysics of the Shifa. Mediaeval Stud 42:337–352Google Scholar
  13. Matthews S (2001) Reason, community and religious tradition: Anselm’s argument and the Friars. Ashgate, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  14. Oppenheimer P, Zalta E (1991) On the logic of the ontological argument. Philos Perspect 5:509–529Google Scholar
  15. Oppy GR (1995) Ontological arguments and belief in God. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Sorabji R (1983) Time, creation and the continuum: theories in antiquity and the early middle ages. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tomas Ekenberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden