Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy

2011 Edition
| Editors: Henrik Lagerlund

Posterior Analytics, Commentaries on Aristotle’s

  • John L. Longeway
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9729-4_414

Abstract

Beginning with the translation of Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics into Latin in the course of the twelfth century, the Latin authors of the Middle Ages presented a theory of demonstration – an argument that produces scientific knowledge by presenting the cause of the truth of the conclusion, based on that work, and largely exposited in connection with commentaries on it. Different versions of the theory were developed with different metaphysical commitments. Robert Grosseteste wrote the first widely circulated commentary, developing an Augustinian version of the theory. Then two different versions were developed by the Aristotelians, Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas. William of Ockham developed a fourth version within his nominalist metaphysics. In all these versions, demonstration of natural causal knowledge was accommodated as well as demonstrations in mathematics. It was supposed by all that demonstrative knowledge is produced by the operation of human faculties within the environment of the natural world, but Augustinian thinkers presupposed the illumination of natural essences by the divine light in some way, consistent with their supposition that natural things enjoyed their essences through participation in forms in the mind of God, so that their functioning could only be understood through those forms. Thomists assumed that the natural essences of particulars had a causal force of their own, considered as universals, that was reflected in demonstrations in natural science, since it was responsible for the causal propensities of particulars. Following an Averroist line, Albert the Great (and his follower, Giles of Rome) and Ockham assumed that the causal connections underlying demonstrative knowledge are entirely between natural particulars, so that demonstration does not explain fundamental natural causal propensities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Bibliography

Primary Sources

  1. Albert the Great (1890–1899) Opera omnia, vol 2: Posteriorum Analyticorum, ed. Borgnet A. Vivès, ParisGoogle Scholar
  2. Aquinas Thomas (1882) Opera omnia, vol 1: Commentarium in libros Posteriorum Analyticorum. Vatican Polyglot Press, Rome (translation: Aquinas Thomas (1970) Commentary on the posterior analytics of Aristotle (trans: Larcher FR). Magi Books, Albany)Google Scholar
  3. Aristotle (1968) Analytica posteriora: translationes Iacobi, Anonymi sive ‘Ioannis’, Gerardi et recensio Guillelmi de Moerbeke. Aristoteles Latinus, IV 1–4, ed. Minio-Paluello L, Dod BG. Desclée de Brouwer, Bruges/ParisGoogle Scholar
  4. Averroës (1562–1574) Aristotelis opera cum Averrois commentatoris, I Part 2a, Magnis Commentariis in Posteriora Resolutoria; Part 2b, Expositionis Mediae in Librum Demonstrationis Aristotelis, IX Quaesita Demonstrativa in Libros Posteriorum, and Diversorum Arabum Quaesita, ed. Iuntina. Apud Iunctas, Venetiis (repr. Minerva, Frankfurt/Mainz, 1962)Google Scholar
  5. Burleigh Walter (1982) Quaestiones super librum Posteriorum, ed. Sommers MC. Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  6. Giles of Rome (1488) Egidius super libros Posteriorum Aristotelis. Bonetus Locatellus, VeniceGoogle Scholar
  7. Giles of Rome (1976) De medio demonstrationis, ed. Pinborg J. Misc Mediaev 10:240–268Google Scholar
  8. Grosseteste Robert (1982) Commentarius in Posteriorum Analyticorum libros, ed. Rossi P. The Catholic University of America Press, FlorenceGoogle Scholar
  9. John of Cornwall = Pseudo-Scotus (1891–1895) In libris Posteriorum Analyticorum Aristotelis quaestiones. In Duns Scotus, Opera omnia, vol 1. Vivès, Paris, pp 342–430Google Scholar
  10. Ockham William (1967) Opera theologica, vol 1: Scriptum in librum primum Sententiarum (Ordinatio), Prologus et Distinctio I, ed. Gál G, Brown SF. Franciscan Institute, St. Bonaventure [Prologue. Questions 2 through 6. For translation, see Longeway (2007)]Google Scholar
  11. Ockham William (1974) Opera philosophica, vol 1: Summa Logicae, ed. Gál G, Brown SF. Franciscan Institute, St. BonaventureGoogle Scholar

Secondary Sources

  1. Longeway JL (2005) Medieval theories of demonstration. In: Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. plato.stanford.edu/entries/demonstration-medieval/Google Scholar
  2. Longeway JL (2007) Demonstration and scientific knowledge in William of Ockham: a translation of Summa Logicae III-II: De Syllogismo Demonstrativo, and selections from the Prologue to the Ordinatio. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre DameGoogle Scholar
  3. Marrone SP (1983) William of Auvergne and Robert Grosseteste. New ideas of truth in the early thirteenth century. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  4. Serene EF (1982) Demonstrative science. Chapter 24 of the Cambridge history of later medieval philosophy, ed. Kretzmann N, Kenny A, Pinborg J. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Wallace WA (1972) Causality and scientific explanation. Medieval and early classical science, vol I. University Press of America, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  6. Wallace WA (1980) Albertus Magnus on suppositional necessity in the natural sciences. In: Albertus Magnus and the sciences, ed. Weisheipl JA. Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, Toronto, pp 103–128Google Scholar
  7. Wallace WA (1981) The uses of hypothesis (Suppositio) in scientific reasoning. In: Studies in Aristotle, ed. O'Meara DJ. The Catholic University of America Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  8. Walton WM (1952) The second mode of necessary or per se propositions according to St. Thomas Aquinas. Mod Schoolman 29:293–306Google Scholar
  9. Wood R (1996) Causality and demonstration: an early scholastic posterior analytics commentary. Monist 99:325–356Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • John L. Longeway
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of WisconsinKenoshaUSA