Skip to main content

Political Philosophy, Byzantine

  • Reference work entry
Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy
  • 181 Accesses

Abstract

Byzantine political philosophy (BPP), in general, is a reflection on the political practices and the nature of the empire, on the divine origin of emperorship, on the hierarchical order of imperial government, civil ranks, and the community of Christian states, under the guidance of the Byzantine Emperor. In a more particular sense, it is a reflection that goes further and comments on its own foundations in Christian metaphysics, epistemology, and axiology. This second approach to the BPP is rather problematic because of the scarce textual evidence. The Byzantines felt not much need to theorize, taking for granted that their empire is a gift from God. It was usual in that time to impose the general theological and philosophical modes of thought on political thought, not taking into account their sophisticated interaction with facts. Thus, the BPP tended to be just a part of the imperial ideology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

Primary Sources

  • Agapetus CP Diaconus (1865) Expositio capitum admonitorium, per partitiones adornata. PG t. LXXXVI.1, coll. 1164A–1186B, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker Ernest (1957) Social and political thought in Byzantium from Justinian I to the Last Palaeologus. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Blemmydes Nikephoros (1906) Andrias basilikos. Studien zu den griechischen Fürstenspiegeln, vol I. Program Maximians-Gymnasium, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Eusebius (1902) Tricennelia, ed. I. Heikel. Eusebius Werke, vol I, (GCS 7), pp I–XVIII, J. C. Hinrichs, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Kekaumenos (1896) Strategicon et incerti scriptoris de officiis regiis libelus. In: Vasilievskij B, Jernstedt V (eds) Zapiski Istoriko-filologicheskogo Fakul’teta Imperatorskogo Peterburgskogo universiteta. Tipografija B. S. Balasheva i Co, Sankt-Peterburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Magister Thomas (1865) Oratio de regis officii ad Andronicum II Palaeologum. PG t. CXLV, coll. 448A–500D, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Meara Dominic, Schamp Jacques (eds) (2006) Miroirs de prince de l’Empire roman au IVe siècle. Academic/Editions du Cerf, Friburg/Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Photios (1983) Ep. 1, Michaeli principi Bulgarorum. Photii Patriarchae Constantinopolitani Epistula et Amphilochia, vol I: Epistolarum pars prima, 1–39. Teubner, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Theophylactus (1864) Bulgariae arciepiscopus Institutio regia ad Porphyrogenitum Constantinum. PG t. CXXVI, coll. 253A–288B, Paris

    Google Scholar 

Secondary Sources

  • Anastos M (1978) Byzantine political theory: its classical precedents and legal embodiment. In: Vryonis Sp Jr (ed) The Past in medieval and modern Greek culture. Byzantina kai Metabyzantina 1. Undena, Malibu, pp 13–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelov D (2007) Imperial ideology and political thought in Byzantium 1204–1330. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck H-G (1970) Res Publica Romana. Vom Staatsdenken der Byzantiner. Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, philosoph-historische Klasse, Sitzungsberichte, 2. Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck H-G (1981) Nomos, Kanon und Staatsraison in Byzanz. Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, philosoph-historische Klasse, Sitzungsberichte, 384. Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron A (1983) Eusebius of Caesarea and the rethinking of history. In: Gabba E (ed) Tria Corda. Scritti in onore di Arnaldo Momigliano. Biblioteca di Athenaeum 1. New Press, Como, pp 71–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Döllger F (1953) Byzanz und die europäische Staatenwelt. Ausgewählte Vorträge und Aufsätze. Buch-Kunstverlag, Ettal

    Google Scholar 

  • Dvornik F (1966) Early Christian and Byzantine political philosophy. Origins and background, vol 1–2. The Dumbarton Oaks Center for Byzantine Studies, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadolin A (1970) A theory of history and society. With special reference to the Chronographia of Michael Psellos; 11th century Byzantium. Stockholm studies in the history of literature 11. Almquist & Wiksell, Stockholm/Göteborg/Uppsala

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunger H (1982) State and society in Byzantium. Proc R Ir Acad 82C:197–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Karagiannopoulos IE (1970) Ē politikē theōria tōn Byzantinōn. Byzantina 2:39–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicol DM (20076) Byzantine political thought. The Cambridge history of medieval political thought, c. 350–c. 1450. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 51–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Obolensky D (1971) The Byzantine commonwealth. Eastern Europe, 500–1453. Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrogorsky G (1956) The Byzantine Empire and the hierarchical world order. Slavon East European Rev 35:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Runciman S (1977) The Byzantine theocracy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Treitinger O (1938) Die oströmische Kaiser- und Reichsidee nach ihrer Gestalttung im höfischen Zeremoniel. Vom oströmischen Staats- und Reichsgedanken. W. Bierdermann, Jena

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this entry

Cite this entry

Christov, I. (2011). Political Philosophy, Byzantine. In: Lagerlund, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9729-4_411

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9729-4_411

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9728-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9729-4

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics