Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy

2011 Edition
| Editors: Henrik Lagerlund

Platonism, Renaissance

  • Stephen Gersh
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9729-4_405

Abstract

This article provides a survey of the Renaissance phase in the history of Platonism and covers the period roughly 1440–1600. Renaissance Platonism is distinguished from medieval Platonism on account of its access to Greek texts and Latin translations of works by Plato himself and by his ancient commentators which had been unavailable earlier. The brief initial phase of Renaissance Platonism is represented by the work of humanist translators of Plato for whom the ethical aspects of Plato’s early dialogues were the primary concern. A much longer second phase was initiated by Marsilio Ficino for whom the cosmological and theological elements in the dialogues of Plato’s middle and later periods and the “Platonism” (really Neoplatonism) of late antique thinkers became the main focus. With respect to the latter phase, this article discusses (1) four main tendencies in Renaissance philosophy: a new understanding of human subjectivity, exploration of the relations between rhetoric and magic, a new understanding of the role of mathematics, and the elaborate historiography of philosophy; (2) five major Platonic philosophers in whom the interplay of these tendencies can be traced: Nicholas of Cusa, Marsilio Ficino, Giovanni Pico della Mirandola, Francesco Patrizi da Cherso, and Giordano Bruno.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Bibliography

Primary Sources

  1. Bruno Giordano (1889) De triplici minimo et mensura. Iordani Bruni Nolani Opera Latine Conscripta 1/3, ed. Tocco F, Vitelli H. Le Monnier FirenzeGoogle Scholar
  2. Bruno Giordano (1991) De umbris idearum, ed. Sturlese R, pref. Garin E. Olschki, FirenzeGoogle Scholar
  3. Bruno Giordano (2002a) De la causa, principio et uno. Opere italiane, vol 1, ed. Aquilecchia G, intro. Ordine N, comm. Aquilecchia G, etc. UTET, TorinoGoogle Scholar
  4. Bruno Giordano (2002b) De l’infinito, universo e mondi. Opere italiane, vol 2, ed. Aquilecchia G, intro. Ordine N, comm. Aquilecchia G, etc. UTET, TorinoGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruno Giordano (2002c) La cena de le ceneri. Opere italiane, vol 1, ed. Aquilecchia G, intro. Ordine N, comm. Aquilecchia G, etc. UTET, TorinoGoogle Scholar
  6. Ficino Marsilio (1981) [Commentary on the Phaedrus] Marsilio Ficino and the Phaedran Charioteer, ed. and trans. Allen MJB. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  7. Ficino Marsilio (2001–2006) Platonic theology, 6 vols, ed. Hankins J, Bowen W, trans. Allen MJB, Warden J. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. Ficino Marsilio (2002) Commentaire sur le Banquet de Platon, De l’ Amour, ed. and trans. Laurens P. Les Belles Lettres, ParisGoogle Scholar
  9. Nicholas of Cusa (1932a) Apologia Doctae Ignorantiae, ed. Klibansky R. Nicolai de Cusa Opera omnia iussu et auctoritate Academiae Litterarum Heidelbergensis II. Meiner, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  10. Nicholas of Cusa (1932b) De Docta Ignorantia, ed. Hoffmann E, Klibansky R. Nicolai de Cusa Opera omnia I. Meiner, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  11. Nicholas of Cusa (1972) De coniecturis, ed. Koch J, Bormann K, Senger HG. Nicolai de Cusa Opera omnia III. Meiner, HamburgGoogle Scholar
  12. Nicholas of Cusa (1988) De beryllo, ed. Senger HG, Bormann K. Nicolai de Cusa Opera omnia XI/1, new edn. Meiner, HamburgGoogle Scholar
  13. Patrizi Francesco. Apologia. See Gregory T (1955) L’ Apologia e le Declarationes di F. Patrizi. Medioevo e Rinascimento. Studi in onore di Bruno Nardi. Firenze, pp 385–424Google Scholar
  14. Patrizi Francesco (1581) Discussionum Peripateticarum tomi IV… ad Pernam Lecythum, BaselGoogle Scholar
  15. Patrizi Francesco (1593) Nova de universis philosophia… Mammarelli, FerraraGoogle Scholar
  16. Pico della Mirandola Giovanni (1942) De hominis dignitate, Heptaplus, De ente et uno e scritti vari, ed. Garin E. Aragno, FirenzeGoogle Scholar
  17. Pico della Mirandola Giovanni (1999) 900 Conclusions philosophiques, cabalistiques et théologiques, ed. and trans. Schefer B. Éditions Allia, ParisGoogle Scholar

Secondary Sources

  1. Allen MJB (1998) Synoptic art. Marsilio Ficino on the history of Platonic interpretation. Olschki, FirenzeGoogle Scholar
  2. Copenhaver B, Schmitt CB (1992) Renaissance philosophy. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Cranz FE (2000) Nicholas of Cusa and the renaissance, ed. Izbicki TM, Christanson G. Ashgate, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  4. Craven WG (1981) Giovanni Pico della Mirandola. Symbol of his age: modern interpretations of a renaissance philosopher. Droz, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  5. Hankins J (1994) Plato in the Italian renaissance, 3rd edn, 2 vols. Brill, Leiden/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Kraye J (2002) Classical traditions in renaissance philosophy. Ashgate, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  7. Kristeller PO (1943) The philosophy of Marsilio Ficino, trans. Conant V. Columbia University Press, New York (repr. P. Smith, Gloucester, 1964)Google Scholar
  8. Kristeller PO (1964) Eight philosophers of the Italian renaissance. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Leinkauf T (1990) Il neoplatonismo di Francesco Patrizi da Cherso come presupposto della sua critica ad Aristotele. La Nuova Italia, FirenzeGoogle Scholar
  10. Tigerstedt EN (1974) The decline and fall of the Neoplatonic interpretation of Plato, an outline and some observations. Societas Scientiarum Fennica, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  11. Yates FA (1964) Giordano Bruno and the hermetic tradition. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London (repr. Routledge, New York, 1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen Gersh
    • 1
  1. 1.The Medieval InstituteUniversity of Notre DameNotre DameUSA